Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

FLOAT - What Is It Exactly???

Started by Robert Nurse · · Last activity · 30 posts · 688 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
4 July 2004
Last activity
7 July 2004
Original author
Robert Nurse
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
688
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–30 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. DRS said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Carl Fogel

    You stopped being amusing a long time ago. For irony to succeed it must be
    based on fact and since you've got it entirely wrong right from the start
    you've just been making a glib fool of yourself.

    Dear DRS,

    Thank heavens a sensible, relevant fellow like you is here
    to clear things up to benefit us all!

    Such convincing detail! So many facts! Such wit, such
    charm, such willingness to defend the rightness of your
    battle against unfamiliar words and neglected attributions
    as embodied by the forces of darkness led by Sheldon Brown
    and his loathsome henchmen--and all with that quiet dignity,
    unperturbed by sarcasm or irony or whatever ya wanna call
    'em!

    (I hear that they're the tools of the devil himself!)

    Your glib but still devoted admirer,

    Carl Fogel

  2. DRS said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    "Sheldon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    >>"Yaw" is bicycle specific terminology?
    >
    >Nope, it's a general term, that's why it's not in my BICYCLE
    >Glossary.
    >
    >
    >>My point is that that definition is not as clear as it should be.
    >
    >Perhaps you're right. I've revised the definition in hopes of
    >making it easier for readers with a limited English vocabulary to
    >understand.

    Unless you've memorized the roughly half a million words in the
    complete Oxford Dictionary your English vocabulary is also limited.

    And please leave the relevant attributions in. I am not Robert
    Nurse.

    Dear DRS,

    Boy, I'm glad that someone finally had the courage to speak
    up and complain about not getting his money's worth from
    that greedy Sheldon Brown's web site! The nerve of that guy,
    using terms like that!

    Writing unclearly benefits nobody, whether it is free or not.

    Give me a [censored] break: http://www.dictionary.com. But I'm glad
    you've encouraged the incredibly inconsiderate Mr Brown to update the
    definition. I stopped reading his site awhile back because it was such
    a pox on the cycling community.

    Greg
    --
    Destroy your safe and happy lives
    Before it is too late
    The battles we fought were long and hard
    Just not to be consumed by rock'n'roll

  3. <[email hidden]> wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    Your increasingly awed admirer,

    You know, if you say "increasingly awed" quickly enough, you say "yaw" in
    there somewhere. Nicely done, Carl.

    JF

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRS said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Dear DRS,

    By God, you're right!

    And come to think of it, that's what really gravels me about
    Sheldon--it's his attitude!

    He's good-natured, he's helpful, he's generally right, and
    he probably can't even spell "prissy."

    Who the hell does he think he is, using terms like "yaw
    plane" to describe technical matters?

    Stuff like that makes my blood boil almost enough to commit
    a general breach of Usenet etiquette!

    Your truly chastened admirer,

    Carl Fogel

    [censored] off, Carl.

    *Plonk*

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland OR

  5. Jim Flom said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    Your increasingly awed admirer,

    You know, if you say "increasingly awed" quickly enough, you say "yaw" in
    there somewhere. Nicely done, Carl.

    JF

    Dear Jim,

    Ah, some people are too kind. Y'all flatter me, but it was
    completely awe-nintentional, so the credit is
    entirel-y'awrs.

    If I were famous or a genius, I could claim credit--after
    yawl, lots of James Joyce's supposedly subtle puns and
    word-play turned out to be nothing more than over a thousand
    errors made by bored French compositors trying to type-set
    what they privately called Anglo-Irish drivel.

    And then there's poor dying Falstaff and the mysterious "a
    Table of greene fields" line that drove Theobald to guess
    that the First Folio was actually supposed to read "'a
    babbled of greene fields."

    But I'm just odd.

    Yawrs truly,

    Carl Fogel

  6. "Ted Bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [censored] off, Carl.

    *Plonk*

    Another loser gone.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  7. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    DRS wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Writing unclearly benefits nobody, whether it is free or not.

    Give me a [censored] break: http://www.dictionary.com. But I'm glad
    you've encouraged the incredibly inconsiderate Mr Brown to update the
    definition. I stopped reading his site awhile back because it was
    such a pox on the cycling community.

    Ah, another fool. Apparently they can breed. Most unfortunate.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  8. DRS said:

    "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    DRS wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Writing unclearly benefits nobody, whether it is free or not.

    Give me a [censored] break: http://www.dictionary.com. But I'm glad
    you've encouraged the incredibly inconsiderate Mr Brown to update the
    definition. I stopped reading his site awhile back because it was
    such a pox on the cycling community.

    Ah, another fool. Apparently they can breed. Most unfortunate.

    You're funny. Will you be my friend?

    Greg
    --
    Destroy your safe and happy lives
    Before it is too late
    The battles we fought were long and hard
    Just not to be consumed by rock'n'roll

  9. Quoted message said:

    ...
    Boy, I'll say it matters! I hadn't reallized that Sheldon
    wasn't benefitting me until you took the time and trouble to
    point it out! How can guys like him live with themselves?

    And then Sheldon went too far and committed a general breach
    of Usenet etiquette! People like him defile the internet!...

    I demand that Sheldon Brown refund all the money I have paid to view his
    website. 😉

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

  10. DRS said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Carl Fogel

    You stopped being amusing a long time ago. For irony to succeed it must be
    based on fact and since you've got it entirely wrong right from the start
    you've just been making a glib fool of yourself.

    The whole thread is actually quite amusing, what with the
    stubbornness involved...
    --
    Rick Onanian

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.