Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Flite ti padding question

Started by landotter · · Last activity · 31 posts · 868 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 February 2006
Last activity
21 February 2006
Original author
landotter
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
868
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–31 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Ozark Bicycle said:

    IIRC, the original Flite had minimal padding, but a rather soft shell.
    Is that what you mean by squishy?

    landotter said:

    Shell is nice and compliant, but there's a good amount of padding,
    which decreases towards the nose of couse.

    I'm used to very firm saddles, and had heard the same about the Flites,
    but it seems softer than rumour would have it. No biggie, I'm just
    sitting here tapping away as conditions outside are nasty.

    In the next couple of days I should be able to ride the damn thing and
    decide for myself.

    It's just that for a decade everybody's been raving about the Flite,
    and I finally got one, and tho it looks frightening, it feels like an
    80s Vetta touring perch. LOL


    The progression from Turbo to Flite, which are roughly the
    same conservative shape, is the cut away side and thinner
    shell. The saddle base can flex more so less pad is needed.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  2. -snip Flite-

    landotter said:

    I'm bidding on a roadster on Ebay, so if the Flite doesn't work on the
    road bike, it'll be a humorous addition to a 45 pound black beast. :P

    Generally, you'll want a slimmer saddle, such as a Filte,
    where the bars are low relative to the saddle and as the
    rider is more 'aero'.

    Try a much wider saddle where the rider is more upright, as
    on a roadster, with more weight proportionally on the saddle.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. A Muzi said:

    -snip Flite-

    landotter said:

    I'm bidding on a roadster on Ebay, so if the Flite doesn't work on the
    road bike, it'll be a humorous addition to a 45 pound black beast. :P

    Generally, you'll want a slimmer saddle, such as a Filte,
    where the bars are low relative to the saddle and as the
    rider is more 'aero'.

    Try a much wider saddle where the rider is more upright, as
    on a roadster, with more weight proportionally on the saddle.

    Generally true. I used to keep the bars on my rod-brake Raleigh at or
    below seat level and used a vintage race saddle with it. :P Once going,
    that sucker's gyroscopic effect was pretty cool, with the heavy huge
    tires and all.

    The Flite feels like a touring saddle imho, not a bad thing--though I'm
    thinking my vintage and harder Selle Royal saddles will be better for
    distance. The ice on the roads is preventing this experimentation. 😄

  4. landotter said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    Pay $2 for a saddle, get a $2 saddle. No such thing as a free lunch.

    your snark does nothing but make you look like an [censored].

    WTF do you expect out of a $2 or $.50 saddle??

    Try it and see if ya like it. Don't try to get wisdom from a NG that
    can't see, feel, use the thing.

  5. Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman said:
    landotter said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    Pay $2 for a saddle, get a $2 saddle. No such thing as a free lunch.

    your snark does nothing but make you look like an [censored].

    Give Peter a break - after all he is repressing into his subconscious
    the desire to sit on a luxuriously comfortable recumbent bicycle SEAT.
    😉 <-- [Note Smiley]

    I did and yes, funny-funnier than the guy with the $2 saddle.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Tom Sherman

  6. Bill said:
    Quoted message said:


    Pay $2 for a saddle, get a $2 saddle. No such thing as a free lunch.

    Come on Peter, I know your just trying to be clever. The low price of
    something at a thrift store surely doesn't equate to quality or value. Only
    that it may be under priced. I've worn through the cover on the old Flite Ti
    on my witer bike and would love to get my hands on a replacement cheap.
    Bill

    I know, why the 'otter' should just put it on and ride it, try it. I
    tried a Flite, a new one, and it gave me a saddle sore in one ride. If
    the thing works for Otter, groovy, don't care where it came from, but
    hard to tell if his 200 pennies was well spent or not-his butt.

  7. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    landotter said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Pay $2 for a saddle, get a $2 saddle. No such thing as a free lunch.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your snark does nothing but make you look like an [censored].

    Quoted message said:

    WTF do you expect out of a $2 or $.50 saddle??

    Try it and see if ya like it. Don't try to get wisdom from a NG that
    can't see, feel, use the thing.

    The terravermin is VERY sensitive, Peter. Don't address him (we'll assume)
    so harshly.

    HTH, BS

  8. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    landotter said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    Pay $2 for a saddle, get a $2 saddle. No such thing as a free lunch.

    your snark does nothing but make you look like an [censored].

    WTF do you expect out of a $2 or $.50 saddle??

    Did I say I expected anything?

    Quoted message said:


    Try it and see if ya like it. Don't try to get wisdom from a NG that
    can't see, feel, use the thing.

    I simply asked a question and have been rewarded by many interesting
    answers that satisfied by curiosity. The Flite *has* been made with
    various degrees of flex in the shell and with different amounts of
    padding.

    I just wanted to know if the softness was normal, freakish, or a sign
    of foam breakdown. Big whoop. It's been glare icy here so I thought I
    could shoot the [censored] on UN without some folks putting their arrogance
    on display. No such luck.

    I'm not looking for a magical solution, as I don't have a problem, just
    got a nice saddle for a good price that happens to look good. It shaves
    a whole 2 ounces off the bike and may or may not be comfy, if not I'll
    replace it with one of several that I've got that work fine. The
    promise of less thigh friction is compelling.

    As far as I know, a $2 Flite purchased from a bric-a-brac bin should
    perform as well as the $120 model purchased at the boutique bicycle
    shop--if it works it works...right? I might be dangerously wrong
    though. OH NOES!

  9. email hidden said:

    There is a date code on Flite saddles. Look on the
    underside, at the plastic block under the nose that
    the rails are fixed to. You should see something like
    a "97" (or other year) with little month letters in a clock
    around it, stamped onto the block. AFAIK most Selle
    Italia saddles have a date code like this somewhere
    on the underside.

    I haven't ever really noticed any difference in Flite saddles,
    but don't have a very recent one. It's the kind of thing you
    have to ride to find out if it's going to work.

    I've been riding on these things for almost fifteen years and I've
    never noticed 1) the date codes, and 2) any difference in softness. I
    just did a quick survey of my five Flite equipped bikes and there is
    indeed a distinct difference in the softness of the padding. Here are
    the results:

    91 soft (Fuji Touring Series)
    92 soft (Nishiki Linear)
    96 firm (MTB)
    98 firm (Vitus 992)
    02 firm (Trek 1400)

    Obviously Selle Italia did change the construction of the Flite. Can
    anyone fill in the blanks?

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

  10. John Everett said:

    I've been riding on these things for almost fifteen years and I've
    never noticed 1) the date codes, and 2) any difference in softness. I
    just did a quick survey of my five Flite equipped bikes and there is
    indeed a distinct difference in the softness of the padding. Here are
    the results:

    91 soft (Fuji Touring Series)
    92 soft (Nishiki Linear)
    96 firm (MTB)
    98 firm (Vitus 992)
    02 firm (Trek 1400)

    Obviously Selle Italia did change the construction of the Flite. Can
    anyone fill in the blanks?

    They changed from soft-ish to firm-ish some time between '92 and '96.

    HTH, BS (slow morning)

  11. On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:11:39 GMT, "Sorni" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    John Everett said:

    I've been riding on these things for almost fifteen years and I've
    never noticed 1) the date codes, and 2) any difference in softness. I
    just did a quick survey of my five Flite equipped bikes and there is
    indeed a distinct difference in the softness of the padding. Here are
    the results:

    91 soft (Fuji Touring Series)
    92 soft (Nishiki Linear)
    96 firm (MTB)
    98 firm (Vitus 992)
    02 firm (Trek 1400)

    Obviously Selle Italia did change the construction of the Flite. Can
    anyone fill in the blanks?

    They changed from soft-ish to firm-ish some time between '92 and '96.

    Clearly a man with a keen sense of the obvious. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.