UK and Europe · Public discussion

Flashing LEDs - again

Started by Pdannyd · · Last activity · 28 posts · 2,277 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 January 2003
Last activity
1 February 2003
Original author
Pdannyd
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,277
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Tony Raven said:
    Quoted message said:

    reallite.comreallite.com

    Quoted message said:

    Pah, feeble. You really need niterider.combike taillight02.html. They get
    real respect!

    Only 16 LEDs? Pathetic! The RealLITE has 18! And it's visible a mile away in daylight. Allegedly.
    It's certainly intercoursingly bright!

    --
    Guy
    ===
    I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
    about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
    wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

    highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtml highwaycode.gov.uk09.shtml

  2. Chris Bardell said:

    <CYNIC>Do they think I'm a motorbike at first glance, and hence a "legit road user", and therefore
    dip their lights?</CYNIC>

    I can believe this after (on a completely dark stretch of road) approaching a cager who dipped his
    lights at first sight of my twin headlights approaching, but stuck them back on full beam when
    closer - close enough to tell I wasn't a motorcycle, perhaps?
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?

  3. a semi-troll said:

    "Ian Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, it had previously written

    Quoted message said:

    Who do you believe regarding your visibility - your own prejudices or the actual experiences
    of motorists?

    Personally, I believe my own actual experience, as a motorisat and a cyclist.

    Incidently, does it not occur to you that sometimes a cyclist might (shock!) see another
    cyclist, and even were they not also a motorist would be well aware of what various lights
    setups look like on teh road.

    Did I say that cyclists don't drive? Don't read more than I have written.

    Your post contrasts the experience of cyclists with the experience of motorists. This is rational
    only if you consider the groups to be exclusive.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't have foglights or prejudices.

    Moron.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  4. you know? said:
    Tony Raven said:
    Quoted message said:

    reallite.comreallite.com

    Quoted message said:

    Pah, feeble. You really need niterider.combike taillight02.html. They get
    real respect!

    Only 16 LEDs? Pathetic! The RealLITE has 18! And it's visible a mile away in daylight. Allegedly.
    It's certainly intercoursingly bright!

    Pinch of salt there, I'd say.

    IIRC you need 1000 candela for a 1 (nautical) mile daylight visibility, assuming (mumbme mumble) of
    background illumination.

    Tim
    --
    fast and gripping, non pompous, glossy and credible.

  5. Tim Hall said:


    Pinch of salt there, I'd say.

    IIRC you need 1000 candela for a 1 (nautical) mile daylight visibility, assuming (mumbme mumble)
    of background illumination.

    They just omitted to say you needed a good pair of binoculars to see it ;-)

    Tony

    raven-family.comraven-family.com

    "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" George
    Bernard Shaw.

  6. "chris French" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think it coincidence that he was using a front flashing light as his sole light. (and
    seemed to be one of the newer ones of decent brightness, not one of these feeble jobbies.) I can
    only assume that against the background of many headlights, reflections from the body work of cars
    etc. in the rain and on the car window his flashing light just did not stand out at all. It was
    only when he came near enough to be seen as a cyclist that I seemed to spot him.

    Which is exactly why I believe powerful front lights are needed. The front light has to compete
    against a backdrop of headlights, street lights etc and has a hard enough time doing so, add some
    rain and it gets worse. Rear lights don't suffer so much especially if high vis clothing or good
    reflectors are used because headlights do a decent job of picking up cyclists, assuming they're
    not in stealth mode. IMHO as a cager and cyclist high vis reflective gear is a great asset, as
    noted by Dave.

    Although I rarely cycle in the dark now when I used to do so regularly I used a large diameter
    rechargeable 6w halogen front backed up with a 2.4 Cateye job and 2 multi led rears, both steady but
    I would now set one on flashing as I think it's a good idea. I also used plenty of reflective stuff.
    I rarely had a problem, certainly no more so than in daylight.

    My 10p, Pete

  7. Peter B said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't think it coincidence that he was using a front flashing light as his sole light. [....] I
    can only assume that against the background of many headlights, reflections from the body work of
    cars etc. in the rain and on the car window his flashing light just did not stand out at all.

    Quoted message said:

    Which is exactly why I believe powerful front lights are needed. The front light has to compete
    against a backdrop of headlights, street lights etc and has a hard enough time doing so, add some
    rain and it gets worse.

    Where there are street lights no cycle light less than a Stadium 3 can really compete - but it
    doesn't have to, because with street lights the cyclist is lit up. Assuming one is not wearing
    Stealth Cycling gear, the large lump of cyclist with the fluorescent jacket is likely to be more
    visible than the small spot of light.

    I use dynamo lights. These are not humungously bright, but they work and they are legal - and the
    battrries never run down.

    Quoted message said:

    IMHO as a cager and cyclist high vis reflective gear is a great asset, as noted by Dave.

    Absolutely. And reflective materials on the bike, making sure that you have at least one BS grade
    reflector where the lights are going to hit (on the back of the back mudguard is actually a very
    good spot).

    And now I'm going to get my new SON built into the wheel of my 'bent
    :-)

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  8. PDannyD said:

    Who do you believe regarding your visibility - your own prejudices or the actual experiences of
    motorists?

    I had to go for several years without being able to cycle on a regular basis, particularly in
    the winter, because of my work situation. During that time, bicycle LEDs hit the scene. I will
    never forget how impressed I was the first time I saw a cyclist with flashing red lights: stuck
    out a mile.
    --
    Graham Steel: [email hidden] Web: steelworks.org.uksteelworks.org.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.