Road Cycling · Public discussion

Flanders Pick

Started by Bret · · Last activity · 35 posts · 1,312 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
5 April 2007
Last activity
12 April 2007
Original author
Bret
Posts
35
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,312
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–35 of 35
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Alexander Lackner said:

    [email hidden] schrieb:

    Quoted message said:


    Put me down for Devolder

    My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.

    Devolder is a good choice (as is Allan Davis, if you were going with Disco boys)
    and Ballan has been riding well this year but my sedimental pick is going to be
    Michael Boogerd.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  2. Howard Kveck said:

    my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.

    (Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)
    It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is
    definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll
    always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight.
    With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.

    --
    E. Dronkert

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Howard Kveck said:

    my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.

    (Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)

    Very good...

    Quoted message said:

    It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is
    definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll
    always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight.
    With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.

    Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him to win
    it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato (likely to be
    heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic choice is Boonen
    or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  4. Howard Kveck said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Howard Kveck said:

    my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.

    Quoted message said:

    (Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)

    Very good...

    Quoted message said:

    It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is
    definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll
    always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight.
    With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.

    Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him to win
    it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato (likely to be
    heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic choice is Boonen
    or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.

    Well, if we're going to limit it to being realistic about
    people who are actually on strong teams and favorites in
    the sprint, that really cuts down the whole fun of picking
    random dark horses (Nuyens, Gilbert, Tyler Farrar).

    O'Grady has been riding well. I'd like to see him get that
    one huge result.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:
    Howard Kveck said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Ewoud Dronkert said:

    Howard Kveck wrote:
    > my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.

    Quoted message said:

    (Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)

    Very good...

    Quoted message said:

    It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is
    definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll
    always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight.
    With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.

    Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him
    to win it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato
    (likely to be heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic
    choice is Boonen or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.

    Well, if we're going to limit it to being realistic about
    people who are actually on strong teams and favorites in
    the sprint, that really cuts down the whole fun of picking
    random dark horses (Nuyens, Gilbert, Tyler Farrar).

    Making the picks only from realistic choices does sort of take away from the fun
    of it. As far as Nuyens goes, I sort of considered him but dismissed him because of
    him being on Cofidis - I don't think they can win a race like this. But he did
    pretty well today in seventh. Funny that Boogard did better than my "realistic pick
    of O'Grady.

    Quoted message said:

    O'Grady has been riding well. I'd like to see him get that
    one huge result.

    Yeah, that'd be good. He's been close enough times in the last year or so.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  6. Alexander Lackner said:

    [email hidden] schrieb:

    Quoted message said:

    Put me down for Devolder

    My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.

    Congratulations on your pick.

    Andre

  7. Andre schrieb:

    Quoted message said:
    Alexander Lackner said:

    [email hidden] schrieb:

    Quoted message said:

    Put me down for Devolder


    My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.

    Congratulations on your pick.

    Andre

    thanks. As picks winner, I get to armchair-coach:
    Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake-
    when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was
    going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from
    following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at
    first). Yet somehow Cancellara seemed to reconsider, preferring to seek
    the cooperation of the group, when it looked like he could have disposed
    of them all. No way Steegmans or any of the top group would have gotten
    back on his wheel the way he was going, and with 40 or so seconds in
    hand on the Muur I think he would have made it.
    Then again, Cancellara could have been really spent himself at that
    point, OR (who knows) made a short-term decision to sacrifice his Ronde
    prospects for a double next sunday.

  8. Alexander Lackner said:

    Andre schrieb:

    Quoted message said:
    Alexander Lackner said:

    [email hidden] schrieb:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Put me down for Devolder
    My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.

    Quoted message said:

    Congratulations on your pick.

    Quoted message said:

    Andre

    thanks. As picks winner, I get to armchair-coach:
    Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake-
    when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was
    going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from
    following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at
    first).

    <snip>

    Dumbass -

    Quoted message said:

    From my armchair position it seems that he went too early given his


    lack of capable allies.

    Congrats on your correct prediction. I'll bet that you didn't put any
    money down on it. Sucker!

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  9. Kurgan Gringioni schrieb:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake-
    when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was
    going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from
    following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at
    first).

    <snip>

    Dumbass -

    Quoted message said:

    From my armchair position it seems that he went too early given his


    lack of capable allies.


    _____________________

    my point was, he didn't look like he really needed allies, especially
    a.) guys who have been away all day and b.) a fellow he knows is not
    going to truly work with him, because he has family back in the chasing
    bunch.

    Quoted message said:


    Congrats on your correct prediction. I'll bet that you didn't put any
    money down on it. Sucker!


    ______________________
    I do it for the glory and the girls. Now if you'll excuse me

    greets
    Alexander
    Vienna

  10. Bret said:

    My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.

    Bret

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

  11. Scott said:
    Bret said:

    My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.

    Quoted message said:

    Bret

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

    Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It
    will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar
    to what Boonen was doing at that age.

    Last Sunday during the cycling.tv coverage of RvV, there was a T-
    Mobile rider identified as Burghardt that had crashed on a railroad
    crossing and appeared to be badly hurt. Was that a misidentification
    or did he really get back on and ride to 13th after that?

    Bret

  12. Bret said:
    Scott said:

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Quoted message said:

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

    Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It
    will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar
    to what Boonen was doing at that age.

    Last Sunday during the cycling.tv coverage of RvV, there was a T-
    Mobile rider identified as Burghardt that had crashed on a railroad
    crossing and appeared to be badly hurt. Was that a misidentification
    or did he really get back on and ride to 13th after that?

    cyclingnews says that was Lorenzo Bernucci, not Burghardt
    (news item titled "Flanders injury update."😉

    Boonen may not be back to 100% after crashing in Flanders,
    nor 100% for Sunday.

    In Gent-Wevelgem, it seems like there's always carnage
    on the descent of the Kemmelberg. This year's report
    twice blames loose waterbottles. Maybe in addition to the
    32 spoke wheels, the teams should fit MTB bottle cages
    for Gent-Wevelgem rather than those wimpy flexy carbon
    things.

    Ben

  13. "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Scott said:
    Bret said:

    My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.

    Quoted message said:

    Bret

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

    Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It
    will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar
    to what Boonen was doing at that age.

    I think that Boonen wasn't going to jepardize his P-R by riding too hard
    today. He went to his agreed upon limit and when everyone else went further
    he simply rolled off. Smart move to my mind.

    But if I were a betting man I'd think really hard about Roger Hammond on
    Sunday.

  14. Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Scott said:

    On Apr 4, 10:05 pm, "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Bret

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It
    will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar
    to what Boonen was doing at that age.

    I think that Boonen wasn't going to jepardize his P-R by riding too hard
    today. He went to his agreed upon limit and when everyone else went further
    he simply rolled off. Smart move to my mind.

    But if I were a betting man I'd think really hard about Roger Hammond on
    Sunday.

    You may be on to something with your thoughts on Hammond. He often
    shows flashes of brilliance, especially in the tougher, cobbled
    races. He's due for a big win, too.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bret said:
    Scott said:
    Bret said:

    My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.

    Quoted message said:

    Bret

    Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.

    Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite
    interesting.

    Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It
    will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar
    to what Boonen was doing at that age.

    This was a great win for Burghardt (his first race win) and Hammond's second
    place is close to his previous best, a third at P-R (yes, I think third at P-R has
    more value than second at G-W). Hammond has been pretty successful at G-W already
    though, with finishes of sixth, eighth and tenth. Maybe he'll get the win next year.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.