My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.
Devolder is a good choice (as is Allan Davis, if you were going with Disco boys) and Ballan has been riding well this year but my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.
my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.
(Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?) It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight. With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.
my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.
(Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)
Very good...
Quoted message said:
It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight. With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.
Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him to win it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato (likely to be heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic choice is Boonen or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.
my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.
Quoted message said:
(Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)
Very good...
Quoted message said:
It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight. With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.
Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him to win it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato (likely to be heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic choice is Boonen or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.
Well, if we're going to limit it to being realistic about people who are actually on strong teams and favorites in the sprint, that really cuts down the whole fun of picking random dark horses (Nuyens, Gilbert, Tyler Farrar).
O'Grady has been riding well. I'd like to see him get that one huge result.
Howard Kveck wrote: > my sedimental pick is going to be Michael Boogerd.
Quoted message said:
(Because he's such a down-to-earth guy..?)
Very good...
Quoted message said:
It would be something. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening. He is definitely very strong, but not Boonen 05 or Gewiss 94 strong. He'll always have someone else up there with him on the finishing straight. With Armstrong gone, he is now certain to lose any sprint.
Oh, I know that he isn't likely to actually win the race, but I want him to win it. I wonder if Liquigas is going to throw everything behind Pozzato (likely to be heavily marked) or if Paolini is strong enough. My more realistic choice is Boonen or Stuart O'Grady. I'll say StewyO.
Well, if we're going to limit it to being realistic about people who are actually on strong teams and favorites in the sprint, that really cuts down the whole fun of picking random dark horses (Nuyens, Gilbert, Tyler Farrar).
Making the picks only from realistic choices does sort of take away from the fun of it. As far as Nuyens goes, I sort of considered him but dismissed him because of him being on Cofidis - I don't think they can win a race like this. But he did pretty well today in seventh. Funny that Boogard did better than my "realistic pick of O'Grady.
Quoted message said:
O'Grady has been riding well. I'd like to see him get that one huge result.
Yeah, that'd be good. He's been close enough times in the last year or so.
My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.
Congratulations on your pick.
Andre
thanks. As picks winner, I get to armchair-coach: Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake- when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at first). Yet somehow Cancellara seemed to reconsider, preferring to seek the cooperation of the group, when it looked like he could have disposed of them all. No way Steegmans or any of the top group would have gotten back on his wheel the way he was going, and with 40 or so seconds in hand on the Muur I think he would have made it. Then again, Cancellara could have been really spent himself at that point, OR (who knows) made a short-term decision to sacrifice his Ronde prospects for a double next sunday.
> Put me down for Devolder My semi-educated guess is Alessandro "Gewiss" Ballan.
Quoted message said:
Congratulations on your pick.
Quoted message said:
Andre
thanks. As picks winner, I get to armchair-coach: Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake- when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at first).
<snip>
Dumbass -
Quoted message said:
From my armchair position it seems that he went too early given his
lack of capable allies.
Congrats on your correct prediction. I'll bet that you didn't put any money down on it. Sucker!
Cancellara rode incredibly, yet made one tiny albeit costly mistake- when he hooked up with the escapees around 30k from the finish, he was going to ride past them (his shadow Steegmans looked a little spent from following him up to that point and dropped to the back of that group at first).
<snip>
Dumbass -
Quoted message said:
From my armchair position it seems that he went too early given his
lack of capable allies.
_____________________
my point was, he didn't look like he really needed allies, especially a.) guys who have been away all day and b.) a fellow he knows is not going to truly work with him, because he has family back in the chasing bunch.
Quoted message said:
Congrats on your correct prediction. I'll bet that you didn't put any money down on it. Sucker!
______________________ I do it for the glory and the girls. Now if you'll excuse me
Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite interesting.
Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar to what Boonen was doing at that age.
Last Sunday during the cycling.tv coverage of RvV, there was a T- Mobile rider identified as Burghardt that had crashed on a railroad crossing and appeared to be badly hurt. Was that a misidentification or did he really get back on and ride to 13th after that?
Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite interesting.
Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar to what Boonen was doing at that age.
Last Sunday during the cycling.tv coverage of RvV, there was a T- Mobile rider identified as Burghardt that had crashed on a railroad crossing and appeared to be badly hurt. Was that a misidentification or did he really get back on and ride to 13th after that?
cyclingnews says that was Lorenzo Bernucci, not Burghardt (news item titled "Flanders injury update."😉
Boonen may not be back to 100% after crashing in Flanders, nor 100% for Sunday.
In Gent-Wevelgem, it seems like there's always carnage on the descent of the Kemmelberg. This year's report twice blames loose waterbottles. Maybe in addition to the 32 spoke wheels, the teams should fit MTB bottle cages for Gent-Wevelgem rather than those wimpy flexy carbon things.
"Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Scott said:
Bret said:
My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.
Quoted message said:
Bret
Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.
Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite interesting.
Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar to what Boonen was doing at that age.
I think that Boonen wasn't going to jepardize his P-R by riding too hard today. He went to his agreed upon limit and when everyone else went further he simply rolled off. Smart move to my mind.
But if I were a betting man I'd think really hard about Roger Hammond on Sunday.
On Apr 4, 10:05 pm, "Bret" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> My wingnut pick for Flanders is Marcus Burghardt.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Bret
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Looks like you jumped the gun by a few days.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite interesting.
Quoted message said:
Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar to what Boonen was doing at that age.
I think that Boonen wasn't going to jepardize his P-R by riding too hard today. He went to his agreed upon limit and when everyone else went further he simply rolled off. Smart move to my mind.
But if I were a betting man I'd think really hard about Roger Hammond on Sunday.
You may be on to something with your thoughts on Hammond. He often shows flashes of brilliance, especially in the tougher, cobbled races. He's due for a big win, too.
Also, it sure looks like Boonen is beatable! Sunday should be quite interesting.
Yeah, I was pleased to see him break through with a big win today. It will be interesting to see if he can do something at Roubaix similar to what Boonen was doing at that age.
This was a great win for Burghardt (his first race win) and Hammond's second place is close to his previous best, a third at P-R (yes, I think third at P-R has more value than second at G-W). Hammond has been pretty successful at G-W already though, with finishes of sixth, eighth and tenth. Maybe he'll get the win next year.