Most of the "experts" today are not familiar with the professional
nutritional literature, for example, the book "Modern Nutrition in
Health and Disease," by Shils and Young, or "Diet and Health," by the
National Research Council.
In the 7th edition of this book, on page 102, we learn that the "the
"data certainly do not support the widely published assumption that n-3
fatty acids possess a specific retarding effect on atherogenesis... in
rabbits at least, they seem to stimulate atherosclerosis." The animals
had liver damage as well as "Periportal fibrosis, lipogranulomas filled
with lipofuscin, and bile duct hyperplasia."
The authors go on to say: "Other potentially harmful effects of 20:5
n-3 and 22:6 n-3 [that is, EPA and DHA] rich fish oils are neglected by
the advocates of increased human consumption of fish oils. The
pathologically increased bleeding times, as observed after aspirin
ingestion, also occurs in Eskimos on a high fish oil diet." The authors
then talk about "a promoting role of [EPA/DHA] in the development of
carrdiac necrosis and an increased sensitivity to catecholamine
stress." And then they state that extreme tocopherol ("vitamin E"😉
deficiency occurs with fish oil supplementation. Another telling
quotation: "...the most severe degree of atherosclerosis was observed
in rabbits fed fish oil, with a similar trend in the [flax] oil group.,
rather than after feeding palm oil with its high concentration of
palmitic and stearic acid [saturated fatty acids]."
What they are talking about when they say that fish oil is "healthy" is
that it inhibits the metabolization of AA, but you don't need AA in
your body at all, and saying that fish oil is healthy in this context
is like saying that the patient died but the operation was successful.
Don't be fooled by the snake oil salesmen who are now hawking the fish
oil.