Peter B said:Take no notice of those who think there is something wrong with carrying a
bike on a car ;-)
Well, for going from Northumberland to the south coast on holiday, there
isn't much else one can do. Plus, a lot of the places I'd like to cycle
are in the region of 25-30-40 miles away. Some people may be able to
cycle 25 miles to a place, cycle round it for a few hours then cycle
home but not me. Not yet - and probably not ever.
Quoted message said:I use Thule roof bars currently because they're the only company who made
good bars to fit my car, on my previous car I had H*lfords (don't ask about
the asterisk :-) own brand which seemed of the same quality for less money,
they are also Swedish made so I wonder if they're made by Thule for
H*lfords.
I looked at the Thule bars in the same store, they had the bars and the
Thule roof bar cycle carriers but not the foot attachments for attaching
the bars to the roof. I think I'll get a set of Renault roof bars.
Quoted message said:To carry the bike I use a Thule carrier that allows both wheels to remain
fitted to the bike and has a swinging arm with a clamp that grips the
down-tube.
The downside of this is that it's not suitable for monocoque bike frames and
without a piece of cloth inside the clamp the bikes paintwork can get
marked.
I'd prefer this kind of attachment, not having much place else to store
the wheels.
Quoted message said:A variation of this is another type by Thule (amongst others no doubt)
whereby the front wheel is removed and the forks fitted to a quick release
on the bike carrier, a friend has this type and they fine.
Seperate carriers are available for the front wheel(s) if space inside the
car is at a premium.
But I see that can be solved :-) Still no point making it more complex imo.
Quoted message said:I can see no downside to these except that one suspension fork manufacturer,
Pace, states their warranty is void if you use that method of bike transit.
Hardly a major concern.
I don't think that's a problem.
Quoted message said:The downside to roof carrying is extra fuel consumption, think circa 20%,
and remembering before entering anywhere with a height restriction.
The upside is nothing stopping access to the boot, no risk of reversing the
bikes into something, no risk of some bozo hitting them in a rear-ender and
no need for additional lighting (although some rear mounted carriers hold
bikes above the light clusters).
The hight thing would be a worry but far less so than seeing the bikes
wave around on this thing on the back. The carrier I have currently
carries the bikes high above the lights and plate.
Thanks for the tips!
G