Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

First 'Bent a High Racer?

Started by GoHabsGo · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,182 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
10 March 2006
Last activity
5 April 2006
Original author
GoHabsGo
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,182
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?

  2. GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?

    No particular reason why not, as I see it. There's nothing
    intrinsically tricky about them, as long as your feet can reach the
    ground easily.
    Note that you can be a fair bit lower and still be eye-level with most
    drivers, and the comfort advantage is pretty much a non-issue if you
    have decent suspension, which will give you a smoother ride than a
    bigger wheel though at a cost in weight and complexity.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Peter Clinch <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:

    No particular reason why not, as I see it. There's nothing
    intrinsically tricky about them, as long as your feet can reach the
    ground easily.


    That shouldn't be a problem. I'm 5'11".

    Quoted message said:

    Note that you can be a fair bit lower and still be eye-level with most
    drivers, and the comfort advantage is pretty much a non-issue if you
    have decent suspension, which will give you a smoother ride than a
    bigger wheel though at a cost in weight and complexity.


    I really want to keep the weight as low as possible and the speed as high
    as possible, within my budget. Also I have read about pogo effect with
    suspension could lose some efficiency.

  4. GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?

    Well as with any bike here is my advise: Test ride as many bikes as
    possible. Wait 1 to 2 weeks. Ride the same bikes again. Let the bike
    choose you. Now about a highracer. As long as you can "feet down"
    comfortably. And can get proper leg extension. A hi might make a good
    choice. I just bought my first bent a few weeks ago. And after riding
    one for a couple of hundred miles now. I don't see myself riding my df
    to much.

    Ken
    --
    You never have the wind with you - either it is against you or you're
    having a good day. ~Daniel Behrman, The Man Who Loved Bicycles

    Homepage: http://www.bikesandmoreonline.com/

  5. "GoHabsGo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough
    to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?

    High racer, first recumbent? Shouldn't be a problem. Note: Going
    fast is more a function of the rider than the bike. Ask Lance.
    And take me, as case in point, a high "racer" with me on it, isn't... %^)

    I have three recumbents, in purchase order, BikeE (16x20 CLWB),
    Tour Easy (20x700c LWB) and Volae Sport (650c x 650c). I still ride
    all three for various routes and purposes. Starting and stopping on the
    lower bottom bracket BikeE and Tour Easy is easier for me than the
    high bottom bracket Volae. Not really a big issue, though. I have
    about 7500 miles on the Tour Easy and only about 2500 on the
    Volae and a similar amount on the BikeE (don't have reliable
    estimate for it since the cyclometer on it sometimes resets itself).

    For at least moderately smooth roads, I think I'm perhaps 10-15%
    faster on the Volae than on the Tour Easy at the same effort, but it's
    hard to quantify. When the road gets rougher, the speed advantage
    disappears, for me, at least. On packed gravel, I prefer the low
    bottom bracket bikes and on really rough surfaces, I prefer the
    wide tires and suspension of the BikeE.

    For shorter climbs, I think the lighter weight of the Volae helps. For
    long sustained climbs, I usually end up spinning at fairly high rev's
    and slower speeds and bike weight matter less. I don't have
    many miles on the Volae for multimile ascents, but here's probably
    not 15% difference for that sort of climbs. Going up mountain
    roads for miles of climbing at 10,000+ feet, I did OK on the
    tour loaded Tour Easy, eventually, slowish, but steady.

    For long descents, I still prefer the LWB for stability. The Volae
    starts to scare me a bit when I get above 30 mph. Perhaps some of
    it is just the thinner tires of the Volae, or the ability of the Tour Easy
    frame to take up some of the road bumps, or maybe it's my comfort
    level.

    You won't know until you ride a high racer whether you'll feel comfortable
    on it or not. I didn't have a problem on my first high racer test ride and
    found even low-speed handling and balance quite reasonable. There
    is heel strike potential on Volae and Bacchetta and other SWB recumbents.
    That can take some adjustment time for low-speed tight-space turning.

    I think a high racer sounds good for your application. I doubt you'll
    be unhappy, as long as you don't expect to gain dramatic and
    immediate speed increases over your upright, and remember, yes,
    there are some things that an upright bike does better! Comfort
    and fun not being two of them, for many of us, though! I started
    riding recumbents because of an injury. I've always wished I'd
    started riding them sooner!

    If you can find a high racer used, then you can worry less about
    whether you'll be happy with it knowing that you can sell it without
    taking too much loss. I bought my Volae used and I had less than
    10 miles total on high-racers at the time. I got a good deal on the
    price and it's been worth every penny I paid for it. So has the BikeE!
    So has the Tour Easy!

    Go out and test ride a few! Have fun! %^)

    Jon Meinecke

  6. GoHabsGo said:

    I really want to keep the weight as low as possible and the speed as high
    as possible, within my budget. Also I have read about pogo effect with
    suspension could lose some efficiency.

    Pogo effect is limited on 'bents with well designed suspension. In
    part because you're pushing at right angles to the direction of
    suspension travel. You can get pedal bob on some, especially if
    you mash high gears rather than spin lower ones, but 'bents with
    good suspension are very steady. Riding along behind an HP Vel
    Streetmchine, for example, you can see the rear wheel contsantly
    moving up and down over small bumps while the rack stays /very/
    still and level.
    Another aspect of this is that the rougher the surface you're on,
    the more suspension affects the speed. On smooth pavement there's
    little for suspension to do so it's dead weight, but on the rough
    without it then every bump you hit requires the bike and rider to
    go up and down, which costs a great deal of energy. Riding with a
    fitter pal on a carbon DF is usually a case of her waiting for me,
    but if it's a bad backroad, especially downhill, she can't catch
    me, and that's down to the increased efficiency from the
    suspension, as the only thing that has to go up and down are the
    wheels, lower fork legs and rear triangle. So it can be the case
    that, like fairings, by adding to the weight in the right way for
    certain situations, you go faster. The main point of suspension is
    often efficiency rather than comfort.

    So whether or not it will slow you down or speed you up or have
    little net effect will depend a lot on where it is you're riding.
    The rougher it is, the more difference.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  7. GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?


    My first bent is a Bacchetta Strada. With some extras I knew I wanted from test riding. Heel strike got me once, right in front of the house going very slow - I started to peddle in a turn. Wham, down was I.

    If you like high racers - go for it. Avoid Recumbent Regret.

    Ride everything you can get your butt on first though!!!

  8. GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before? I like the idea of going fast and also being high enough to
    be eye to eye with most car drivers. Also think the comfort of the larger
    wheels will roll smoother.

    Any comments?

    A couple people I know bought highracers as their first 'bents. (Oddly,
    both were Bachettas: one Strada, one Ti Aero). Neither has mentioned
    any particular regrets. The Ti Aero owner came with 30 years of upright
    riding experience- now she's a 'bent convert.

    Jeff

  9. Hull 697 said:


    My first bent is a Bacchetta Strada. With some extras I knew I wanted
    from test riding. Heel strike got me once, right in front of the house
    going very slow - I started to peddle in a turn. Wham, down was I....

    No solicitation without a permit.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain

  10. Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman said:


    No solicitation without a permit.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain


    I don't even begin to understand your comment. Are you a cheese salesman?

  11. Hull 697 said:

    I don't even begin to understand your comment. Are you a cheese salesman?


    Tom likes to pedal his trike. If he had alot of cheese he might try to peddle it to make some cash to pay back his student loan.

  12. Hull 697 said:
    Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman said:


    No solicitation without a permit.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain


    I don't even begin to understand your comment. Are you a cheese
    salesman?

    The Cheddar Curtain is a magical wall used to protect against the
    invasion of FIBS.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain

  13. GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before?

    Yes.

    -- Robert, Vision Sabre (first recumbent)

  14. Hull 697 said:
    Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman said:


    No solicitation without a permit.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain

    I don't even begin to understand your comment. Are you a cheese
    salesman?

    As someone else already replied, re-read the message Tom replied to.

    Look for "pedal" vs. "peddle".

    --
    I do not accept unsolicited commercial e-mail. Remove NO_UCE for
    legitimate replies.

  15. What makes a High Racer, a High Racer? I've been away from this group for a
    few years. I retired from Burley last year and am now ready for another
    'bent.
    Thanks,
    Don
    "Robert Stevahn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    GoHabsGo said:

    Would a High racer be ok as a first bent for someone that has never ridden
    a bent before?

    Yes.

    -- Robert, Vision Sabre (first recumbent)

  16. Don George said:

    What makes a High Racer, a High Racer? I've been away from this group for a
    few years. I retired from Burley last year and am now ready for another
    'bent.

    The archetype is dual-big-wheels (usually 571/650c, but in a few rare
    cases 622/700c, and in some more rugged incarnations, 559/26"😉, longer
    than usual wheelbase SWB configuration, OSS with outstretched arms, hard
    shell seat reclined way back, high bottom bracket.

    Something like:

    http://www.bacchettabikes.com/web/products/aero.htm

    or

    http://challengebikes.com/html/index.php?taal=en&selectie=seiran#bike

    or

    http://volaerecumbents.com/2005/volae_team.php

    --
    I do not accept unsolicited commercial e-mail. Remove NO_UCE for
    legitimate replies.

  17. "Don George" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    What makes a High Racer, a High Racer?

    Not me, regardless of the bike's designation! %^P

    Quoted message said:

    I've been away from this group for a few years.

    Welcome back. Sifting through the "noise" for topical
    signal can be challenging here and now.

    Quoted message said:

    I retired from Burley last year and am now ready for another

    "High Racer" is an informal designation. Generally, it's a SWB
    recumbent bike with two 559(26"😉, 571(650c), 622(700c), etc
    wheels and seat height of around 25". There are various
    "light and fast" as well as recreational and touring configurations.
    There are "Low" and "Mid" Racer designations. All share
    similar seat geometry and riding positions.

    Which of the HR's are you considering?

    Jon Meinecke

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.