Darren G said:Nice work. I was wondering what to do tonight!
Erm, you missed it, it was last night! Now you'll have to wait another
year... :-)
Quoted message said:Though I think I detected the odd bit of camera shake :-)
You reckon?
I've tried it both ways in the past. A tripod gives excellent results
of course (of the more traditional variety), but it limits your response
time dramatically. Hand holding allows swinging around quickly to grab
shots you'd otherwise miss, and of course produces more arty effects,
especially if you purposely move the camera around during the exposure.
In some shots I moved the camera to different parts of the sky to
capture multiple rocket blasts in the same shot.
Quoted message said:how did you stop them burning out on the bulb exposure? ISO 100
stopped right down?
Yep, ISO 100. Most of the early shots were taken at f11, occasionally
f16. The main display needed f22-f36, since they were much brighter and
I was pretty close, right outside the ground. The short range shots in
my garden needed to be stopped right down too.
Fortunately, although the exposures were often long, the fireworks
usually weren't, and tended not to be stationary. The ones that
produced a shower from the ground were the biggest problem. If you look
at the second shot of that type, you may notice that the shower seems to
be coming from multiple ground sources. Of course, there was only one
source, but I moved the camera slowly left and right to stop the base
burning out.
Paul
--
http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk
http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk