Robert said:I feel like a bit of an idiot using hand siginals, couple of other issues as well.
Just because many cagers don't bother to signal, that's no excuse for cyclists not to. Of course,
the most important thing is to retain control of your vehicle - you don't want to have an arm stuck
out at a time when you really need both hands on the controls - but generally you should be safer if
your movements are predictable. Road positioning and hand signals are the best ways to help others
predict your movements.
Quoted message said:Does anyone use that up down arm movement to signify slowing down, when coming up to a parked car
drivers expect me to swerve out to the middle, however when stopping I need to do that arm
movement and no-one understands it.
For stopping at traffic lights, obviously no signal is needed. For stopping at the side of the road,
I always signal. I always have (well, at least since I did my Cycling Proficiency 20 years ago) and
I probably always will. I can't imagine feeling silly doing it.
Once or twice, I've been tooted by cagers who clearly didn't understand the signal and evidently
thought I was arsing around. They probably thought I was giving some sort of Rimmeresque right turn
signal. Whether motorists understand the signal or not (and I'm well aware that many of them don't),
it seems to make stopping safer.
IME a motorist who doesn't understand the signal will typically hang back, waiting to see what I'm
about to do. If I didn't signal then there are occasions (e.g. most evenings when I pull up outside
my house) when stopping without a signal could well result in a car ploughing into the back of me.
Quoted message said:Eye contact, since riding a motorbike I do that life saver movement of looking behind me a lot,
drivers seem to leave a LOT of space when I do this, almost embarrasing as if i'm a terrible
cyclist in danger of causing an accident.
You are entitled to that space. There's no reason to be embarrassed about encouraging cagers to
allow sufficient space to pass you safely, or to allow you to maneouvre safely.
Quoted message said:Speed, when driving it's harder to overtake a cyclist the faster they go, so often i'll slow down
from 25mph otherwise it becomes dangerous IMHO when they try and are forced back to the left.
(downhill speeds )
How badly do you want them to overtake? In a 30mph limit, it's no hardship to drive at 25mph. Most
of the time you'll only have to get past them again 10 seconds later, when they catch up with the
traffic jam in front. In those circumstances it's better to dominate the lane and prevent them from
overtaking in the first place. OTOH if there really is a clear road ahead then often it's common
courtesy to let them past. But within reason.
If you slow down then your journey is being delayed, in order to reduce a possible delay to someone
else's journey (in fact there is probably no genuine delay to their journey - even if there seems to
be a clear road ahead, the chances are the cager will be on the tail of the car in front within a
minute or two of passing you). So, do you really believe that the cager's journey is likely to be
more important than yours?
Quoted message said:Right hand turn, I position myself just to the left of the center white lines, holding out my
right arm (height 6ft3"😉,
By all means signal to pull out, but I wouldn't advise leaving your arm out once you're stopped.
Road positioning makes it clear to anyone with an iota of roadsense that you're about to turn right.
If you still get motorcyclists going past you (shouldn't have passed their CBT), well, you've been a
motorcyclist yourself, you know not to turn without a lifesaver.
Quoted message said:Again , south london, if I ride in the gutter in winter,
You don't belong in the gutter. Take your place on the road, you're entitled to it and it's the
safest place to be.
Quoted message said:Riding away from the "danger area" coupled with the frequent crossings and central bollards slows
cars behind me when they have to move left.
There aren't many urban areas (and I should be extremely surprised if South London is one of them)
where a fit cyclist can genuinely slow cars. Cars are slowed down by the congestion caused by - wait
for it - cars. If it's clear that once a car is past you you'll be passing it again 10 seconds
later, why worry about whether it can get past in the first place? And if the road's not all that
busy, then the chances are they'll soon find a space where they can pull out around you properly.
Quoted message said:Anyone else been caught by lorries, I know to leave them space on roundabouts and on turnings but
on a straight road ?.
That sounds like a very lucky escape. Without having been there, two thoughts spring to mind. 1 - if
it was after dark (you don't mention the time of day), were you properly lit? That could have made a
difference to the lorry driver seeing you. 2 - You mentioned earlier riding in the gutter. Were you
riding in the gutter on this occasion, or were you correctly dominating the lane (as you were taught
when you learnt to ride a motorbike)? If you were dominating the lane, you would have been more
visible and would have had more escape room.
--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdannyOpen ↗ ) Recumbent cycle page:
speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbentsOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine