Road Cycling · Public discussion

Fatty Master Progeny In Danger

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 9 posts · 472 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 August 2006
Last activity
31 August 2006
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
472
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

  2. B. Lafferty said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    The "British Fertility Society" (hmmmm...) says,
    "Underweight women and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should
    be forced to address their weight before starting treatment, the society
    said."

    No comment on what should be done with dumbasses.

    Steve

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, Steven Bornfeld

    (') said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    The "British Fertility Society" (hmmmm...) says,
    "Underweight women and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should
    be forced to address their weight before starting treatment, the
    society said."

    No comment on what should be done with dumbasses.

    Surely someone who's fat is a dumbass by definition?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Morning had broken, and there was nothing left for us to do
    but pick up the pieces.

  4. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Steven Bornfeld

    (') said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    The "British Fertility Society" (hmmmm...) says,
    "Underweight women and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should
    be forced to address their weight before starting treatment, the
    society said."

    No comment on what should be done with dumbasses.

    Surely someone who's fat is a dumbass by definition?

    Sorry, not going there.

    Steve

    --
    Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
    http://www.dentaltwins.com
    Brooklyn, NY
    718-258-5001

  5. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm


    A good example of the Socialistic Nanny State controlling everything. A
    bunch of do-goody technocrats decide how you should live your life.

    Didn't Pink Floyd say something about that in "Pigs"?

  6. Steve said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    A good example of the Socialistic Nanny State controlling everything. A
    bunch of do-goody technocrats decide how you should live your life.

    Shouldn't you be complaining about the socialistic
    nanny state mandating that the NHS use the taxpayers'
    (ratepayers'😉 money to fund IVF treatment, before
    complaining about the nanny state setting limits on who
    can receive paid-for IVF based on medical guidelines?

    Quoted message said:

    Didn't Pink Floyd say something about that in "Pigs"?

    Well, if Pink Floyd said something about it, than I certainly
    follow and agree with Pink Floyd's position!

    But I don't remember them mentioning IVF in "Pigs."
    Maybe that was in the rereleased CD version.

    Ben

  7. Quoted message said:
    Steve said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    A good example of the Socialistic Nanny State controlling everything. A
    bunch of do-goody technocrats decide how you should live your life.

    Shouldn't you be complaining about the socialistic
    nanny state mandating that the NHS use the taxpayers'
    (ratepayers'😉 money to fund IVF treatment, before
    complaining about the nanny state setting limits on who
    can receive paid-for IVF based on medical guidelines?

    Quoted message said:

    Didn't Pink Floyd say something about that in "Pigs"?

    Well, if Pink Floyd said something about it, than I certainly
    follow and agree with Pink Floyd's position!

    But I don't remember them mentioning IVF in "Pigs."
    Maybe that was in the rereleased CD version.

    Ben


    The bbc article wasn't about IVF,it was about fertility treatments. You
    know, those families which suddenly pop out 10 kids at once.

  8. in message <[email hidden]>, Steve

    ('h90943@hotmaildotcom') said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm

    A good example of the Socialistic Nanny State controlling
    everything. A bunch of do-goody technocrats decide how you should
    live your life.

    Shouldn't you be complaining about the socialistic
    nanny state mandating that the NHS use the taxpayers'
    (ratepayers'😉 money to fund IVF treatment, before
    complaining about the nanny state setting limits on who
    can receive paid-for IVF based on medical guidelines?

    That is what I am writing about. They pay, therefore they control.
    Kinda goes together.

    You can always go private, if you want to. And can afford it.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If God does not write LISP, God writes some code so similar to
    ;; LISP as to make no difference.

  9. http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/martinrowson/0,,1861791,00.html

    "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Steve

    ('h90943@hotmaildotcom') said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Steve wrote:
    > "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >
    > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5296200.stm
    >
    > A good example of the Socialistic Nanny State controlling
    > everything. A bunch of do-goody technocrats decide how you should
    > live your life.

    Shouldn't you be complaining about the socialistic
    nanny state mandating that the NHS use the taxpayers'
    (ratepayers'😉 money to fund IVF treatment, before
    complaining about the nanny state setting limits on who
    can receive paid-for IVF based on medical guidelines?

    That is what I am writing about. They pay, therefore they control.
    Kinda goes together.

    You can always go private, if you want to. And can afford it.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If God does not write LISP, God writes some code so similar to
    ;; LISP as to make no difference.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.