reminds me of a situation in Toronto a few years ago. A Highschool had an outdoor Basketball Court
and ever since the court was built...not a single complaint. Then Luxury condos went up on 2 sides
of the court and NOW the Police started showing up to hassle the kids who used the court for
Basketball (after) school. The Condo owners did a Petition demanding the Highschool bulldoze the
court and erect fences to keep kids...out of sight and out of hearing range...as the kids presense
was claimed to be devaluating their condo resale value. The condo oners ALSO demanded a bike path be
closed to....wait for it...closed to cyclists. Their point was the cyclists made too much noise as
they rode passed their condo towers. All that gear shifting must have been dreadful to those on the
18th floor...gag.
I am not suggesting the condo owners are wrong or had a valid case and I do NOT see a link between
wealth and really stupid demands, I do however object when I see a cycle path or a Basketball
court...or in the case of "crispy" re: having an existing trail, get new rules attached to them by
people who build new in the midst of what was there before.
I would think having a public trail in existance WAS a big selling feature for those luxury homes,
just like having a pond or a tree lined creek, close to good schools etc. Then those people turn
around and demand laws be imposed to make (their) properties worth more by limiting public
access....and because they pay higher taxes, their demands often are awarded by city councils.
Would I let my Falcon rip in the dark just to pissoff these Luxury home dwellers?....probably not.
The peace & quiet I seek when I trail ride is destroyed by my actions and will destroy the peace &
quiet of other cyclists and home dwellers....no benefit here at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
"crispy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Your karma for your intentional acts of malevolence has already caught
up
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:with you. It is quite popular to dislike and taunt people who are
better
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:off than you, until someone who is not as well off as you does the
same(~:
Quoted message said:
Yes of course. But then I own a Ford Excursion.
Interesting. Upon review, nowhere did I state that they were better off than myself. I merely
described the houses as opulent. Does "small lot size" imply that they are poor?
My point was that once the trail became restricted by these structures, the owners of the
structures tried to restrict the use of the trail by others.