General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Faked postings? If not, what?

Started by Peewiglet · · Last activity · 20 posts · 465 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 January 2005
Last activity
24 January 2005
Original author
Peewiglet
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
465
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been away for a couple of days, and have just looked at the NG
    for the first time since Wednesday night. I looked via Google, and
    found three postings purporting to come from me that I didn't send.

    They're all in the Open Access Land thread (I've not looked anywhere
    else yet) and they don't actually contain anything sinister. Two of
    them just quote pieces of text and don't add any comment, and if they
    were all like that I might have thought it was some sort of weird
    technical blip. However, the third isn't like that. It's in reply to a
    posting from Roger. All the paragraphs of Roger's posting have been
    separated, and the poster has put either a full stop or a question
    mark between each one.

    I was posting late on Wednesday evening via Google, as Claranet had a
    problem that night with posting to NGs. However, these three postings
    all show my Agent 'munged' address rather than the real one I have to
    use for Google.

    I know I'm sometimes confused in my old age, but I'm not confused
    enough to forget sending these posts. Fortunately it's possible for me
    to be absolutely sure, though, because a copy of anything I send to
    any NG remains in my Agent outbox after sending. None of those
    postings are there.

    If anyone can think of a technical hitch that might have caused
    someone else's computer to send postings in my name, showing my munged
    email address and my signature then please let me know. Otherwise, can
    the person who thinks it's funny to fake postings from other people
    please stop: it's not funny at all.

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I've been away for a couple of days, and have just looked at the NG
    for the first time since Wednesday night. I looked via Google, and
    found three postings purporting to come from me that I didn't send.


    [...]

    Quoted message said:


    If anyone can think of a technical hitch that might have caused
    someone else's computer to send postings in my name, showing my munged
    email address and my signature then please let me know. Otherwise, can
    the person who thinks it's funny to fake postings from other people
    please stop: it's not funny at all.


    that's not on! Apart from anything else you don't need any help to be
    top poster

    Seriously, can't think why that should happen without deliberate intent.

    Have a look at the headers and you should be able to glean far more info
    (or ID them & I'll have a butchers 4 u)

    --
    Darren
    mail to darren not ng

  3. On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:11:01 +0000, Peewiglet <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    They're all in the Open Access Land thread (I've not looked anywhere
    else yet) and they don't actually contain anything sinister. Two of
    them just quote pieces of text and don't add any comment, and if they
    were all like that I might have thought it was some sort of weird
    technical blip. However, the third isn't like that. It's in reply to a
    posting from Roger. All the paragraphs of Roger's posting have been
    separated, and the poster has put either a full stop or a question
    mark between each one.

    Can't see that one in amongst the kerfuffle, to be honest. Several of your
    contributions did appear twice, though - one each from Claranet and Google.

    If you can post the message-id, that would assist the search.

    --
    Coffin for sale. Lifetime guarantee.

    Mail john rather than nospam...

  4. Peewiglet wrote

    Quoted message said:

    I've been away for a couple of days, and have just looked at the NG
    for the first time since Wednesday night. I looked via Google, and
    found three postings purporting to come from me that I didn't send.

    There are several people on here, myself included, who have been the
    victim of the occaisional ID spoof.

    Chris

  5. On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:11:01 +0000, Peewiglet <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Hi Peeps,

    This is odder and odder!

    The 3 postings I mentioned didn't d/load to my PC when I finally
    d/loaded the NG into Agent last night. (I know that Claranet filters
    some stuff, which is why I was surprised to see the porno posting to
    the group a couple of weeks ago.) I saw them earlier in the evening,
    via Google.

    I know I sent some dual postings on Wednesday evening because I found
    that things I was sending with Agent, via Claranet, weren't showing
    up, and so I sent copy/pasted a few of them and sent them via my
    Google account. My postings from Agent/Claranet and Google are very
    easy to tell apart, though, because (i) my ID shows up as Peewiglet in
    things posted via Agent/Claranet, whereas I'm 'nogooglenickname' when
    posting via Google, and (ii) I mentioned at the top of all the Google
    postings that it was me, Peewiglet, posting from Google, precisely
    because I wouldn't want to appear to be someone else/to be hidden
    behind a different name.

    I've just been over to Google to try to work out how to provide the
    message IDs. I think I may have solved the problem re: the 2 postings
    that seemed to consist just of quoted text with no comment, but the
    third one I mentioned - the one where all the paragraphs of a long
    posting from Roger had been separated out and a full stop or question
    mark had been placed between each - is no longer there, or at least no
    longer visible to/findable by me.

    The two where I didn't appear to have written anything may well have
    been caused by a display problem on the Google Beta. As it displays on
    my PC, quoted text is shown in blue (with little >s to the left) and
    new text in black. In some posts, however - for instance, the one
    currently shown as message number 147 in the Access Land thread, or
    Message ID Message-ID: <[email hidden]> -
    all the text is shown in blue, and at a glance it looks as though no
    new text has been added. A closer look reveals the new message shown
    in blue with no little >s to the left, though. Also, Message-ID:
    <[email hidden]> (currently Message 135 in
    the Google thread list on my PC) - as it shows up on my PC - just
    shows the words 'Show quoted text' and then my signature, and what I
    wrote only shows up when I click on 'show quoted text', but looks like
    part of the earlier message. It may be I saw a couple of those last
    night and thought they purported to be new postings with no new text.

    What is certain, though, because I was so suprised that I went back
    and checked it several times, is that there was a posting last night
    labelled Peewiglet - therefore purporting to have been sent via
    Agent/Claranet, not Google - in alleged reply to Roger's long posting,
    containing full stops and question marks as described above. I did
    send a reply to one of Roger's postings where I put question marks
    after the first couple of paragraphs, but I added a lot of text after
    many of the remaining paragraphs. What I saw is not a copy of that
    one.

    I'm almost certain that the posting I've just described was numbered
    163 in the list of postings to that thread on Google last night, and
    it was definitely dated 19th January, but I don't know whether the
    numbering shows up the same on everyone's computer. I know it's
    possible to withdraw postings - I did it myself a week or so when I
    accidentally posted some private info relating to someone else to the
    group - so I know the numbers can change.

    Anyway, I'm aware that this may all sound weird, but it's a fact: last
    night the posting was there, now I can't see it - and I've looked
    several times - and there's no copy of it in my outbox, which confirms
    to me that I didn't send it. I've come across faked postings in other
    NGs over the years, although haven't experienced one myself before
    now. Hopefully that's the last of it.

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  6. Peewiglet said:

    Hopefully that's the last of it.

    Me two.

    Best wishes.
    --
    ..
    ^^)PeeWiglet----
    / \ / \

    Sorry! Couldn't resist it!

    ;-)

    Cheers

    Blippie
    --
    Ten minutes of this rain will do more good in half an hour than a fortnight
    of ordinary rain in a month.

  7. .... D'y'know, that was really rather fun. Small things for small minds, I
    know.

    Cheers

    Blippie
    --
    Ten minutes of this rain will do more good in half an hour than a fortnight
    of ordinary rain in a month.

  8. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:30:11 GMT, "Chris Gilbert"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    | Peewiglet wrote
    |
    | > I've been away for a couple of days, and have just looked at the NG
    | > for the first time since Wednesday night. I looked via Google, and
    | > found three postings purporting to come from me that I didn't send.
    |
    | There are several people on here, myself included, who have been the
    | victim of the occaisional ID spoof.

    If they forge *both* the name and the email address, most ISPs will pull
    the account. As Peewiglet is such an unusual pseudonym they may pull the
    account with a different email address. Whatever complain the ISP shown
    in the abuse@???? line in the forged post. If that does not work learn how
    to decode the Path: line.

    --
    Dave F

  9. Peewiglet said:

    Anyway, I'm aware that this may all sound weird, but it's a fact: last
    night the posting was there, now I can't see it - and I've looked
    several times - and there's no copy of it in my outbox, which confirms
    to me that I didn't send it. I've come across faked postings in other
    NGs over the years, although haven't experienced one myself before
    now. Hopefully that's the last of it.


    Is your email acting weird as well?. Sent two on 4th. and 16th., no reply.

    Regards

    -- GeoffC

  10. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:54:48 -0000, "Blippie"

    alt.aviation.roswell.wannabe.wannabe.wannabe said:

    ... D'y'know, that was really rather fun. Small things for small minds, I
    know.

    I'm so confused now that I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring
    to my ramblings about what I saw/didn't see, or what?

    <fx: wraps large cold towel round piggly head...>

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  11. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:51:30 -0000, "Peewiglet \(snort,

    giggle\)' alt.aviation.roswell.wannabe.wannabe.wannabe said:
    Peewiglet said:

    Hopefully that's the last of it.

    Me two.

    Best wishes.
    --
    ..
    ^^)PeeWiglet----
    / \ / \

    Sorry! Couldn't resist it!

    ;-)

    Cheers

    Blippie

    Hehheh... 's ok. It shows how easy it is to do this stuff, though!

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  12. I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    from Peewiglet contained the following:

    Quoted message said:

    Hehheh... 's ok. It shows how easy it is to do this stuff, though!

    What stuff?

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)DogWiglet~~
    / \ / \ bl AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    --
    Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
    It's only Usenet, no one dies.
    My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
    Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

  13. I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    from dogwiglet contained the following:

    D'oh. Damn automated sig...

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
    It's only Usenet, no one dies.
    My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
    Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

  14. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:06:01 +0000, Geoff Berrow <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    from dogwiglet contained the following:

    Dogwiglet?? Lol!! <fx: thwack....!>

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  15. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:56:14 +0000, GeoffC <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Peewiglet said:

    Anyway, I'm aware that this may all sound weird, but it's a fact: last
    night the posting was there, now I can't see it - and I've looked
    several times - and there's no copy of it in my outbox, which confirms
    to me that I didn't send it. I've come across faked postings in other
    NGs over the years, although haven't experienced one myself before
    now. Hopefully that's the last of it.


    Is your email acting weird as well?. Sent two on 4th. and 16th., no reply.

    Apolog's, no... that's just disorganisation.

    <fx: blush...>

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  16. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:48:19 +0000, Peewiglet <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:54:48 -0000, "Blippie"

    alt.aviation.roswell.wannabe.wannabe.wannabe said:

    ... D'y'know, that was really rather fun. Small things for small minds, I
    know.

    I'm so confused now that I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring
    to my ramblings about what I saw/didn't see, or what?

    <fx: wraps large cold towel round piggly head...>

    Uh-oh... ignore that. For some reason Claranet got your postings out
    of order: I get it now!

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  17. In article <[email hidden]>, Peewiglet
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    'm beginning to feel like
    a complete nutter! 🙂

    What time do you want me to send him round? ;-)

    --

    Dominic Sexton

  18. Dominic Sexton said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Peewiglet
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    'm beginning to feel like
    a complete nutter! 🙂

    What time do you want me to send him round? ;-)

    :-) I'm glad you have one too....

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  19. Quoted message said:

    I get it now!

    Yep, in my house the long winter evenings just fly by!

    Cheers

    Blippie
    --
    Ten minutes of this rain will do more good in half an hour than a fortnight
    of ordinary rain in a month.

  20. .... and I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky kids!

    Cheers

    Blippie
    --
    Ten minutes of this rain will do more good in half an hour than a fortnight
    of ordinary rain in a month.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.