S
Scott Kurland, RMT
Guest
johnfoss wrote:
> About walking:
> Walking is indeed complicated. Talk to anyone trying to program a
> machine to do it. Most machines that walk have much larger feet than
> the human equivalent.
Or more feet, yeah.
> When talking of learning to ride a unicycle, we generally assume a
> person who already walks. The balance part of walking is almost the
> same, if not exactly the same as what you use when unicycling. The
> learning part is converting your feet from walking to turning pedals.
>
> Walkers have the advantage of two feet. This makes it easy to stop
> without idling. We can't.
Can so. Can hop, can (maybe someday) stand still, or, as they say, stillstand.
> Having two feet also makes it possible to
> change directions much faster, and do a few other things we can't
> compete with on unicycles. Example: ever tried playing basketball on a
> unicycle against people on feet?
Gymnastics, footbag, under-the-leg juggling tricks....
> About walking:
> Walking is indeed complicated. Talk to anyone trying to program a
> machine to do it. Most machines that walk have much larger feet than
> the human equivalent.
Or more feet, yeah.
> When talking of learning to ride a unicycle, we generally assume a
> person who already walks. The balance part of walking is almost the
> same, if not exactly the same as what you use when unicycling. The
> learning part is converting your feet from walking to turning pedals.
>
> Walkers have the advantage of two feet. This makes it easy to stop
> without idling. We can't.
Can so. Can hop, can (maybe someday) stand still, or, as they say, stillstand.
> Having two feet also makes it possible to
> change directions much faster, and do a few other things we can't
> compete with on unicycles. Example: ever tried playing basketball on a
> unicycle against people on feet?
Gymnastics, footbag, under-the-leg juggling tricks....