General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Facts about Jan Drew

Started by Happy Oyster · · Last activity · 48 posts · 1,885 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 August 2003
Last activity
19 August 2003
Original author
Happy Oyster
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,885
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi, all,

    I am collecting material about Jan Drew. I want to make a web-page
    about here criminal abuse of ill people.

    Please send the email to :

    [email hidden]
    subject = [Jan Drew]

    Thank you,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    Schwerer Pfusch Arzneimittelprüfung

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_amp.htm

  2. Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Hi, all,

    I am collecting material about Jan Drew. I want to make a web-page
    about here criminal abuse of ill people.

    Please send the email to :

    [email hidden]
    subject = [Jan Drew]

    Thank you,

    Aribert Deckers

    Everything you need or want is in the google archives.

    r

    --
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
    magic."

    Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

  3. One after the other the hydra heads of the naturopath mafia show up.

    THAT ONE:
    From: "Rod" <[email hidden]>
    Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:42:46 GMT
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.217.224.171

    Get lost Loser.
    Rod.

  4. Get lost Loser.
    Rod.
    "Happy Oyster" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi, all,

    I am collecting material about Jan Drew. I want to make a web-page
    about here criminal abuse of ill people.

    Please send the email to :

    [email hidden]
    subject = [Jan Drew]

    Thank you,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    Schwerer Pfusch Arzneimittelprüfung

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_amp.htm

  5. I do not mind the fruit-and-berry eating crowd ...... even when they
    want only composite ... still okay.

    I draw the line when they want me to STOP all amalgam on anyone (due
    to fumes - ?) and they WANT composite compatibility testing ........

    Strange but they never want to pay for it themselves either!

    Joel

    Rhino Ceros said:

    One after the other the hydra heads of the naturopath mafia show up.

    THAT ONE:
    From: "Rod" <[email hidden]>
    Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:42:46 GMT
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.217.224.171

    Get lost Loser.
    Rod.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    no one has seen the tooth or
    teeth in question so take
    this advice within its proper
    context ~ this is the internet!

  6. "Joel M. Eichen D.D.S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I do not mind the fruit-and-berry eating crowd ...... even when they
    want only composite ... still okay.

    I draw the line when they want me to STOP all amalgam on anyone (due
    to fumes - ?) and they WANT composite compatibility testing ........

    The people who want you to stop using amalgam on all patients may actually
    be concerned for your health as well as their own. But more likely, they
    simply don't want to go to a dentist who uses amagam on anyone, since this
    would unnecessarily expose them and their family to ambient mercury vapor
    levels quite possibly exceeding the EPA's limits every time they visit your
    office.

  7. "Rich" <,@.> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:39:13 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hydrogen is a very dangerous element. However when combined with
    Oxygen it gives us water which is essential to life. In the same way
    mercury is a highly toxic substance but when in the form of a silver
    amalgam it is relatively safe and and excellent compound to restore
    decayed teeth IMO.

    Salt is made of Chlorine and Sodium, both highly toxic. Combined they


    become

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    an essential nurient. Mercury, however, is toxic in whatever form it is
    found, chemical or amalagam. It isn't magically rendered harmless by


    placing

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it inside a tooth or a vaccine.

    Is hydrogen magically made harmless by combining with oxygen?? Are
    Chlorine and Sodium magically rendered harmless by combining them
    together??

    There is nothing magical about the fact that combining mercury with
    silver as an amalgam does make it a much safer compound compared to
    using mercury alone.

    You missed my point. The mercury does not react with the other metals in the
    amalgam in a chemically as Sodium and Chlorine do. It continues to exist in
    the elemental form. Thus it produces toxic mercury vapor over the entire
    life of the filling, with increasing levels caused by chewing and hot
    liquids. That's why I call it a mercury delivery system. But mercury is also
    highly toxic when it combines chemically to form mercury salts. Either way
    you've got a dangerous metal that is not safe in any form.

    Quoted message said:

    That is not to say that the amalgam is 100% safe. But if you look at
    the epidemiologic evidence comparing people with amalgams and those
    without you will not find that amalgams pose a health risk for the
    vast majority of people who have them.

    What evidence? Show me the studies. I don't believe they've ever been done.

  8. Why not get CEREC porcelain inlays? Why subject yourself to poison? I
    do not understand why you would do it if it harms you.

    Joel

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:43:45 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:

    I wouldn't expect someone who's being chronically exposed to mercury vapor
    on the job, to understand some people's natural disinclination to be fitted
    with time-released mercury vapor delivery systems (amalgam fillings.) that
    routinely exceed the EPA limit of tolerable mercury exposure in mouths with
    multiple fillings.

    "Joel M. Eichen D.D.S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I do not mind the fruit-and-berry eating crowd ...... even when they
    want only composite ... still okay.

    I draw the line when they want me to STOP all amalgam on anyone (due
    to fumes - ?) and they WANT composite compatibility testing ........

    Strange but they never want to pay for it themselves either!

    Joel

    Rhino Ceros said:

    One after the other the hydra heads of the naturopath mafia show up.

    THAT ONE:
    From: "Rod" <[email hidden]>
    Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:42:46 GMT
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.217.224.171

    Get lost Loser.
    Rod.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    no one has seen the tooth or
    teeth in question so take
    this advice within its proper
    context ~ this is the internet!


    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  9. They do not accept anyone into dental school without an amalgam
    compatibility test. You must show a natural immunity to amalgam vapors
    and immunity to amalgam pellets before you get into the profession.

    Joel

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:39:13 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:


    "Rich" <,@.> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:43:45 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:

    I wouldn't expect someone who's being chronically exposed to mercury


    vapor

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    on the job, to understand some people's natural disinclination to be


    fitted

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with time-released mercury vapor delivery systems (amalgam fillings.)


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    routinely exceed the EPA limit of tolerable mercury exposure in mouths


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    multiple fillings.

    If dental amalgam exposure to mercury is so harmful how does one
    explain the fact that dentists overall do not show any increase
    morbidity??

    It would be interesting to see an epidemiological study on the alzheimer's
    rates of elderly dentists as compared to the general population. To be fair,
    the study would have to screen out any individuals who have amalgam
    fillings, dentists included. Here's one study showing a link between mercury
    and the nerve degeneration typical of alzheimer's:

    http://www.ucalgary.ca/~gauntlet/eg/news/stories/20010329/news05.html

    Quoted message said:

    Epidemiologic evidence strongly indicates that dental amalgams are
    quite safe for the great majority of individuals. This is likely
    because such tiny amounts of mercury are released in the course of
    chewing, etc.

    Hydrogen is a very dangerous element. However when combined with
    Oxygen it gives us water which is essential to life. In the same way
    mercury is a highly toxic substance but when in the form of a silver
    amalgam it is relatively safe and and excellent compound to restore
    decayed teeth IMO.

    Salt is made of Chlorine and Sodium, both highly toxic. Combined they become
    an essential nurient. Mercury, however, is toxic in whatever form it is
    found, chemical or amalagam. It isn't magically rendered harmless by placing
    it inside a tooth or a vaccine.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  10. @. said:

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:39:13 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hydrogen is a very dangerous element. However when combined with
    Oxygen it gives us water which is essential to life.

    Now you have gone too far ...... dihydro-oxygen is one of the most
    deadly substances on earth and everyone needs dihydro-oxygen
    compatibility testing ....... see Altcorp for where to send your money
    .........

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  11. For the uninitiated, sodium chloride is a chemical compoound, while
    amalgam is a mixture and always remains a mixture. And yes, a mixture
    can separate over time.

    Amalgam a compound? Nope. Can sodium chloride "separate?" Nope. See
    Second Law of Thermodynamics.

    Joel

    [This is why dentists must study physics and chemistry]

    @. said:

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:39:13 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hydrogen is a very dangerous element. However when combined with
    Oxygen it gives us water which is essential to life. In the same way
    mercury is a highly toxic substance but when in the form of a silver
    amalgam it is relatively safe and and excellent compound to restore
    decayed teeth IMO.

    Salt is made of Chlorine and Sodium, both highly toxic. Combined they become
    an essential nurient. Mercury, however, is toxic in whatever form it is
    found, chemical or amalagam. It isn't magically rendered harmless by placing
    it inside a tooth or a vaccine.

    Is hydrogen magically made harmless by combining with oxygen?? Are
    Chlorine and Sodium magically rendered harmless by combining them
    together??

    There is nothing magical about the fact that combining mercury with
    silver as an amalgam does make it a much safer compound compared to
    using mercury alone.

    That is not to say that the amalgam is 100% safe. But if you look at
    the epidemiologic evidence comparing people with amalgams and those
    without you will not find that amalgams pose a health risk for the
    vast majority of people who have them.

    And we have at least one anecdote that amalgams were safe right in
    this newsgroup. Read the history of Jan Drew and you will find that
    although she believes that she was poisoned by mercury she in
    actuality was poisoned by reading a Hulda Clark book. And because Jan
    is both highly suggestible and somatically hypervigilant as well as
    delusional she is convinced that she almost died of mercury poisoning.
    But how does a person one day think they are dying of mercury
    poisoning and the very next day after having some amalgams out feel
    better than she had in two years!!

    Aloha,

    Rich

    Quoted message said:

    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  12. Catchy!

    @. said:

    Read the history of Jan Drew and you will find that
    although she believes that she was poisoned by mercury she in
    actuality was poisoned by reading a Hulda Clark book

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  13. Essentially correct, however the delivery system "delivers" micrograms
    ........... is that harmful? Time will tell!

    Joel

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:59:12 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:

    You missed my point. The mercury does not react with the other metals in the
    amalgam in a chemically as Sodium and Chlorine do. It continues to exist in
    the elemental form. Thus it produces toxic mercury vapor over the entire
    life of the filling, with increasing levels caused by chewing and hot
    liquids. That's why I call it a mercury delivery system. But mercury is also
    highly toxic when it combines chemically to form mercury salts. Either way
    you've got a dangerous metal that is not safe in any form.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  14. Ahahhhhh! The dental police!

    <<without the benefit of science too>>

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:22:43 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com>

    Quoted message said:

    The people who want you to stop using amalgam on all patients may actually
    be concerned for your health as well as their own.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  15. Actually the PEL is 0.100 mg/m3 of ambient air and all but the
    sloppiest dental offices are well below that.

    Why?

    Technology. No bottles of mercury, it comes presealed in capsules from
    the factory, safe disposal, etc.

    HOW TO EXCEED: Do something stupid like heating scrap amalgam to
    recover silver or something else really dumb.

    Joel

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:22:43 -0600, "onward" <onward_mailblocks_com> wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    ambient mercury vapor
    levels quite possibly exceeding the EPA's limits every time they visit your
    office.

    --
    Joel M. Eichen, .
    Philadelphia PA

    STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
    <You fill it in>

  16. Rod said:

    Ahh ! So now it is the "Mafia,"

    Yes, it is a mafia. Selling [censored] to people, let them die, ripp off their
    last pennies, then leave them for the flies...

  17. Get lost you stupid poor excuse for an animal. Are you writing about the
    drug companies ? (if so I agree)
    If you respond to me then at least have the courage to disclose your true
    self and your true email address rather than hiding behind nom deplumes and
    false emails. But then again it probably suits your gutsy character.
    Rod
    "Rhino Ceros" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Rod said:

    Ahh ! So now it is the "Mafia,"

    Yes, it is a mafia. Selling [censored] to people, let them die, ripp off their
    last pennies, then leave them for the flies...

  18. onward,

    Peeking back in this newsgroup after a year of absence, I see the same
    Hg dentists are employing the same tactics in their vain hope to avoid
    lawsuits.

    In case you are new to dealing with these people, let me make a comment:
    These are utterly corrupt group of professional liers when it comes to
    Hg. They know there's at least a trillion dollar lawsuit coming, far
    bigger than the tobacco suit that is going on, and the prospect scares
    them to death. Like any unethical criminals, they are doing their best
    to preserve their purse at the expense of ruining lives of a lot of people.

    And all this I heard it from a dentist I met at the chelation clinic.

    Facts are abundant, but arguing with the Hg dentists will not go
    anywhere because they are programmed to deny.
    http://www.toxicteeth.net/mercuryFillings.cfm

    qborba

    onward said:

    "Rich" <,@.> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    There is nothing magical about the fact that combining mercury with
    silver as an amalgam does make it a much safer compound compared to
    using mercury alone.

    You missed my point. The mercury does not react with the other metals in the
    amalgam in a chemically as Sodium and Chlorine do. It continues to exist in
    the elemental form. Thus it produces toxic mercury vapor over the entire
    life of the filling, with increasing levels caused by chewing and hot
    liquids. That's why I call it a mercury delivery system. But mercury is also
    highly toxic when it combines chemically to form mercury salts. Either way
    you've got a dangerous metal that is not safe in any form.

    Quoted message said:

    That is not to say that the amalgam is 100% safe. But if you look at
    the epidemiologic evidence comparing people with amalgams and those
    without you will not find that amalgams pose a health risk for the
    vast majority of people who have them.

    What evidence? Show me the studies. I don't believe they've ever been done.

  19. More urban myth and delusions.

    I haven't used amalgam for 18 years, but I know it is not a health risk.
    It's just ugly and patients prefer teeth to look like teeth.

    Mercury does form metallic bonds in the amalgam. They are not as strong
    as ionic or covalent bonds in other molecules, but it isn't the same as
    elemental mercury.

    A 'chelation clinic'?? I'll bet they 'chelate' your wallet quite nicely.

    LOL,
    Fawks

    BTW, baiting me to try to argue will be fruitless.

    Quincas Borba said:

    These are utterly corrupt group of professional liers when it comes to
    Hg. They know there's at least a trillion dollar lawsuit coming, far
    bigger than the tobacco suit that is going on, and the prospect scares
    them to death. Like any unethical criminals, they are doing their best
    to preserve their purse at the expense of ruining lives of a lot of people.

    And all this I heard it from a dentist I met at the chelation clinic.

    Facts are abundant, but arguing with the Hg dentists will not go
    anywhere because they are programmed to deny.

  20. More self-serving denials to protect the wallet.

    I am recovering from 20 years of suffering, thanks to chelation. From
    the severe mental fog that completely debilitated me (by the time I
    reached the end of a paragraph, I couldn't remember the beginning), I
    have recovered about 80% of previous mental capacity with two years of
    chelation.

    Mercury leaks from amalgam and destroys neurons. Pure and simple.
    Macromedia movie presentation 4.6MB:
    http://www.iaomt.org/merc_release.swf
    Written presentation:
    http://www.iaomt.org/smokingteeth.pdf

    Laugh while you can, your time is coming.

    qborba

    Steven Fawks said:

    More urban myth and delusions.

    I haven't used amalgam for 18 years, but I know it is not a health risk.
    It's just ugly and patients prefer teeth to look like teeth.

    Mercury does form metallic bonds in the amalgam. They are not as strong
    as ionic or covalent bonds in other molecules, but it isn't the same as
    elemental mercury.

    A 'chelation clinic'?? I'll bet they 'chelate' your wallet quite nicely.

    LOL,
    Fawks

    BTW, baiting me to try to argue will be fruitless.

    Quincas Borba said:

    These are utterly corrupt group of professional liers when it comes to
    Hg. They know there's at least a trillion dollar lawsuit coming, far
    bigger than the tobacco suit that is going on, and the prospect scares
    them to death. Like any unethical criminals, they are doing their best
    to preserve their purse at the expense of ruining lives of a lot of people.

    And all this I heard it from a dentist I met at the chelation clinic.

    Facts are abundant, but arguing with the Hg dentists will not go
    anywhere because they are programmed to deny.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.