EZ Sport?

Quoted message said:

Also, considering what I wrote above about how I ride, and that I am new

to

Quoted message said:

recumbents, are there any other brands/models that people would suggest I
take a look at also, before deciding?

I am also looking to buy a recumbent and have heard of the Cycle Genius
brand. I haven't seen one in person, yet, though. Their website is
www.cyclegenius.com

Pat

I have had my Sport for about two years now, and I still like it. Sure I
dream of moving up to a lighter bike, but the motor is still old, fat &
slow. I'll work on those first. The Sport is easy to ride (in my opinion).
I rode it on the BAMA 2004 ride (just google for bike BAMA to see the pix,
and read about it) which was about 400 miles in a week. We did between 50 &
70 miles per day, and there were some 55 of us.

I have the following accessories: fenders, LED headlight, blinkie LED
taillight, cycle computer (I like cadence) kickstand, panniers, water
bottles, whistle on spring loaded reel lanyard (for use against bad dogs),
knee savers, & clippless pedals.

Things I'm planning to add: fairing, flag, handlebar bag, map holder,
smaller granny front chainring (30 tooth is not low enough for me).--george

PS there is a topica.com list for these bikes, you might want to read a bit
of what's been written at

http://lists.topica.com/lists/ezseries/?cid=6603

--
The Hamiltons
707 Randolph Ave.
Huntsville, AL 35801
"Pat" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Also, considering what I wrote above about how I ride, and that I am new

to

Quoted message said:

recumbents, are there any other brands/models that people would suggest

I

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

take a look at also, before deciding?

I am also looking to buy a recumbent and have heard of the Cycle Genius
brand. I haven't seen one in person, yet, though. Their website is
www.cyclegenius.com

Pat

In article <[email hidden]>, MS <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I am thinking of buying a recumbent, my first one. I recall trying an EZ
Sport last year, and liked it.

Is that still considered a good bike for a beginning recumbist (? ;-) ) to
start with? (I am not interested in racing, just riding for enjoyment and
exercise. Mostly on fairly flat paved terrain.) Are there others I should
look at, before making a decision?

I know there are a few cheaper (such as the same companies EZ-1), but I
think I would prefer the large wheel in the back, not two small wheels like
the EZ-1.

I know there is also a more expensive version of the EZ-Sport. (I forget the
name.) The only difference I can recall, besides nicer color choices, is
that it is a few pounds lighter. I really don't think that would be worth
spending hundreds of dollars more on, to get a few less pounds. (Better to
lose some pounds myself!) (And lighter would probably also mean less sturdy,
no?) Or are there other differences? Does anyone recommend that more
expensive version of EZ-Sport? If so, why?

From anyone who has used an EZ-Sport--please let us know how it is for
you--both positive and negative qualities of it.

What are good accessories to get for it?

Also, considering what I wrote above about how I ride, and that I am new to
recumbents, are there any other brands/models that people would suggest I
take a look at also, before deciding?

Thank you in advance to anyone who provides feedback.

I am also considering buying the Sport. I have compared it to the
Burley Koosah. I am looking forward to my next test ride on these
bikes to confirm my choice. The problem with the Koosah is the lack of
frame to lock the bike to a bike rack.
This poses a problem for me as i lock up frequently. Either bike looks
to be a good ride from what I have tried. The Sport is a bit on the
chunky side, like some of the asses here :-)
Frankly i could use the extra workout myself. Good luck on your
decision.

Slugger - 200 lbs.
goal - 170 lbs.
5'11.5"

I test road the EZ sport a few months ago, and I really like it alot--
it road smooth, the shifting worked well, and I was comfortable. If
you have trouble finding one, I think Bicycle One in Gahanna, Ohio US
has one.

" MS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I am thinking of buying a recumbent, my first one. I recall trying an EZ
Sport last year, and liked it.

Is that still considered a good bike for a beginning recumbist (? ;-) ) to
start with? (I am not interested in racing, just riding for enjoyment and
exercise. Mostly on fairly flat paved terrain.) Are there others I should
look at, before making a decision?

I know there are a few cheaper (such as the same companies EZ-1), but I
think I would prefer the large wheel in the back, not two small wheels like
the EZ-1.

I know there is also a more expensive version of the EZ-Sport. (I forget the
name.) The only difference I can recall, besides nicer color choices, is
that it is a few pounds lighter. I really don't think that would be worth
spending hundreds of dollars more on, to get a few less pounds. (Better to
lose some pounds myself!) (And lighter would probably also mean less sturdy,
no?) Or are there other differences? Does anyone recommend that more
expensive version of EZ-Sport? If so, why?

From anyone who has used an EZ-Sport--please let us know how it is for
you--both positive and negative qualities of it.

What are good accessories to get for it?

Also, considering what I wrote above about how I ride, and that I am new to
recumbents, are there any other brands/models that people would suggest I
take a look at also, before deciding?

Thank you in advance to anyone who provides feedback.

I just bought a Sport Limited yesterday...the aluminum version of the
Sport. I am glad I spent the extra money, because you not only get a
few less pounds but better components, also. I was particularly
pleased with the crisp, quick shifting. I obviously have not ridden
it a lot yet, but I am falling in love with this bike more and more
each time I ride it. I did a lot of research and had settled on the
RANS Stratus, the Tour Easy, and the EZ Sport. The price difference
was too great to ignore so I bought the Sport. I too wanted a larger
rear wheel, and still would ultimately like to have the Tour Easy, but
I think for a newbie, the compromise was a good one.
When I bought it I also bought a small behind the seat bag, and today
went out and bought a pair of clipless pedals as that is what I am
used to on my road bike and I found on the recumbent that I spent a
lot of time trying to find the most comfortable position for my
feet...so, clipless takes care of that for me.
I am looking for a computer that has long enough wiring to put on a
recumbent...anybody have any suggestions?

Quoted message said:

I am looking for a computer that has long enough wiring to put on a
recumbent...anybody have any suggestions?

I bought a Sigma Sport BC800 and then got the extra long wiring kit. It
works like a charm. In fact, I put it on the rear wheel of my EVOX 140 and
there is some slack in the wire so I know it could go on a longer recumbent.

Pat in TX

khopkins said:

I just bought a Sport Limited yesterday...the aluminum version of the
Sport. I am glad I spent the extra money, because you not only get a
few less pounds but better components, also. I was particularly
pleased with the crisp, quick shifting. I obviously have not ridden
it a lot yet, but I am falling in love with this bike more and more
each time I ride it. I did a lot of research and had settled on the
RANS Stratus, the Tour Easy, and the EZ Sport. The price difference
was too great to ignore so I bought the Sport. I too wanted a larger
rear wheel, and still would ultimately like to have the Tour Easy, but
I think for a newbie, the compromise was a good one....

If I liked low bottom brackets better, I would get a RANS Stratus. Not
only is it the best looking LWB recumbent, but it is also fast with an
excellent ride for an unsuspended bike. There are good reasons why it
remains in production, even though the design is over 25 years old.

--
Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

Tom Sherman <[email hidden]> wrote in news:2nape9FuebqoU1@uni-
berlin.de:

Quoted message said:

If I liked low bottom brackets better, I would get a RANS Stratus. Not
only is it the best looking LWB recumbent, but it is also fast with an
excellent ride for an unsuspended bike. There are good reasons why it
remains in production, even though the design is over 25 years old.

We have an EZ Sport and a Stratus. The Sport is a little easier to
navigate around town, but the Stratus (and TE) is in a whole different
league. I'm not saying the EZ isn't a worthwhile bike; it's very good at
what it does. However, the others are much better, IMO.

Howard said:

Tom Sherman <[email hidden]> wrote in news:2nape9FuebqoU1@uni-
berlin.de:

Quoted message said:

If I liked low bottom brackets better, I would get a RANS Stratus. Not
only is it the best looking LWB recumbent, but it is also fast with an
excellent ride for an unsuspended bike. There are good reasons why it
remains in production, even though the design is over 25 years old.

We have an EZ Sport and a Stratus. The Sport is a little easier to
navigate around town, but the Stratus (and TE) is in a whole different
league. I'm not saying the EZ isn't a worthwhile bike; it's very good at
what it does. However, the others are much better, IMO.

The RANS Stratus, Easy Racers TE/GRR (and RANS Velocity Squared) are not
great bicycles for low speed, tight maneuvers or non-vehicular cycling.
However, they are great bicycles for long, and/or fast rides on the open
road.

--
Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

Quoted message said:

We have an EZ Sport and a Stratus. The Sport is a little easier to
navigate around town, but the Stratus (and TE) is in a whole different
league. I'm not saying the EZ isn't a worthwhile bike; it's very good at
what it does. However, the others are much better, IMO.

Have a look at this:

http://www.cyclegenius.com/comparer3.htm

what do you think about these two?

Pat in TX

Quoted message said:

The RANS Stratus, Easy Racers TE/GRR (and RANS Velocity Squared) are not
great bicycles for low speed, tight maneuvers or non-vehicular cycling.
However, they are great bicycles for long, and/or fast rides on the open
road.

IMHO: I find that the upright riding position and low bottom bracket
of most LWB makes urban riding and low speed manuevering a breeze. I
find it easier than most SWB, highracers, and trikes. Lately I've been
testing a Sun EZ Rider AX that I off-road single track at walking
speed and take on steeper (downhill) trails than my MTB. It also
trackstands well at stop lights and signs and turns on a dime.

You'd think LWB length means lack of manueverability, but not always.
Keep in mind the bottom bracket height and heel/front wheel
interference or tweaner (knees between the bars) can inhibit low speed
steering and manuevering.

Bob Bryant
http://www.recumbentcyclistnews.com

Bob Bryant said:

Quoted message said:

The RANS Stratus, Easy Racers TE/GRR (and RANS Velocity Squared) are not
great bicycles for low speed, tight maneuvers or non-vehicular cycling.
However, they are great bicycles for long, and/or fast rides on the open
road.

IMHO: I find that the upright riding position and low bottom bracket
of most LWB makes urban riding and low speed manuevering a breeze. I
find it easier than most SWB, highracers, and trikes. Lately I've been
testing a Sun EZ Rider AX that I off-road single track at walking
speed and take on steeper (downhill) trails than my MTB. It also
trackstands well at stop lights and signs and turns on a dime.

You'd think LWB length means lack of manueverability, but not always.
Keep in mind the bottom bracket height and heel/front wheel
interference or tweaner (knees between the bars) can inhibit low speed
steering and manuevering.

I prefer SWB bikes at low speed, as lesser steering corrections are
required for balance. If a higher BB and smaller front wheel are used
[1], foot wheel contact is not much of an issue. A low seat height is
also preferable, since falling over becomes a trivial matter. T-bars do
not have the clearance issues that tweaner bars do, and are much
superior esthetically.

If one is strictly riding on the street [2], then the greater length of
the LWB bicycle is not an issue. In tight quarters, it is often easiest
just to stand up and rotate the bicycle in place.

[1] No need to mention which bike fits this description. 😉
[2] Certainly my preference.

--
Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

"Bob Bryant" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The RANS Stratus, Easy Racers TE/GRR (and RANS Velocity Squared) are not
great bicycles for low speed, tight maneuvers or non-vehicular cycling.
However, they are great bicycles for long, and/or fast rides on the open
road.

IMHO: I find that the upright riding position and low bottom bracket
of most LWB makes urban riding and low speed manuevering a breeze. I
find it easier than most SWB, highracers, and trikes. Lately I've been
testing a Sun EZ Rider AX that I off-road single track at walking
speed and take on steeper (downhill) trails than my MTB. It also
trackstands well at stop lights and signs and turns on a dime.

You'd think LWB length means lack of manueverability, but not always.
Keep in mind the bottom bracket height and heel/front wheel
interference or tweaner (knees between the bars) can inhibit low speed
steering and manuevering.

Bob Bryant
http://www.recumbentcyclistnews.com

Mr. Sherman's post which follows on this one of Mr. Bryant's does not make
any sense at all and I am tired of refuting nonsense. Needless to say Mr.
Bryant has got it right. A LWB with a low BB will handle just about any
situation with aplomb. I can go anywhere on my Tour Easy clone without
giving it a second thought. That is one hell of a lot more than I can say
for any SWB or a LWB with a high BB. My ultimate easy handling recumbent for
city streets is an old Ed Roeter's Maverick with a very low BB. Hell, it
handles almost as well as an upright. The downside to these bikes as Mr.
Bryant has pointed out on numerous occasions is that you have a more upright
seating position on them and consequently you can get recumbent butt without
half trying.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

"Bob Bryant" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The RANS Stratus, Easy Racers TE/GRR (and RANS Velocity Squared)
are not great bicycles for low speed, tight maneuvers or
non-vehicular cycling. However, they are great bicycles for long,
and/or fast rides on the open road.

IMHO: I find that the upright riding position and low bottom bracket
of most LWB makes urban riding and low speed manuevering a breeze. I
find it easier than most SWB, highracers, and trikes. Lately I've
been testing a Sun EZ Rider AX that I off-road single track at
walking speed and take on steeper (downhill) trails than my MTB. It
also trackstands well at stop lights and signs and turns on a dime.

You'd think LWB length means lack of manueverability, but not always.
Keep in mind the bottom bracket height and heel/front wheel
interference or tweaner (knees between the bars) can inhibit low
speed steering and manuevering.

Bob Bryant
http://www.recumbentcyclistnews.com

The downside to these bikes as Mr. Bryant has pointed out on
numerous occasions is that you have a more upright seating position on
them and consequently you can get recumbent butt without half trying.

I own an EZ Sport. I've put 2500 miles on it so far. I love it. Turning
around on a side street is not really easy. A cul-de-sac is a snap. It
is very comfortable and it attracts a lot of attention. It is still tall
enough to be seen by cars from a safety standpoint. I would buy one
again in a second. I had an EZ1 and put on about 750 miles on it. The EZ
Sport is a major improvement.