In article <[email hidden]>, kevin.harrison2
<[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:Has anyone got experience of using the Magellan Explorist 100 gps ? Anyone
got a view on which is better for entry level handheld gps for UK fell
walking; the Explorist 100 or the basic Garmin Etrex?
My priorities are (1) it locks/aquires successfully (2) battery life, (3)
works at low temp (winter wild camping), (4) weight, (5) hooks up to PC.
The Explorist (100, 200 & 300) do not have computer connections. Neither
does the Garmin Geko 101. I would not buy one without a connection - not
just because of data transfer (both ways) but also for software updates
to fix bugs in the receiver.
I have six receivers including a basic yellow eTrex and a Geko 201. The
Geko is my unit of choice for most trips outside a car (walking, cycling
& running). It is small and light and has much better software than the
eTrex (and better capabilities in some aspects - 10,000 trackpoints as
opposed to ~1500 for instance). The eTrex is also nearing the end of its
life and will not be getting any improvements to its software. The Geko
being 4 or so years younger is still likely to get some development if
Garmin feels it is needed.
The only downside I would see for some people is that it uses AAA
batteries but as I use these in my head-torch and a had torch as well as
sometimes a radio I already have rechargeable AAAs so that is a
non-issue for me.
The price difference between the eTrex and Geko 201 is £7 (well worth
it) here:
http://www.gpsw.co.uk/cats/cl3_23.html
Note that neither the basic eTrex not Geko come with a data cable. You
can buy the genuine Garmin cable for nearly £30 but I would recommend
the £13 clone from:
http://www.lynks.co.uk/cables.html
--
Dominic Sexton