UK and Europe · Public discussion

Exactly how bad is the Strida...

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 16 posts · 986 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
13 July 2006
Last activity
16 July 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
986
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My commuting bike - a run of a few miles twice a day - is an Electra
    Cruiser, but I'm attracted to various cheap-ish folding models for, for
    instance, getting about the town centre after a bus or train ride in -
    with the main accent on good foldability to avoid arguments with public
    transport employees. Unfortunately I'm substantially heavier than the
    specified weight limits of Clive Sinclair's A-Bike and the "JD RAZOR
    COMPACT ADULT BIKE" folder. Dismissing for now the idea of
    distributing my weight over two A-Bikes or Razors Scotch-taped
    together, I turn to the Strida. Strida 3 is said to be an easier and
    more confident ride than the previous models. So if you don't want to
    go further than a mile, tops, then how about it?

    My main concern is the riding position: do you inevitably rest your
    weight on the handlebars? Unfortunately I can't do that; that's why I
    got the Cruiser - I suddenly and inescapably developed a very painful
    condition of the hands and forearms, a sort of computer RSI. But you
    sit back on the Cruiser and the handlebars sweep around in a broad U,
    so your weight isn't on your arms and your hands.

    Conversely, if I only treat it as a scooter with a seat, that's
    something.

    I see that the manufacturer offers a test drive at the expense of
    return shipping paid by the customer if not satisfied, and I'd give it
    a go but I'd ask first. For that matter, if someone in striking
    distance of Glasgow owns a Strida that could be tried - or one that
    they want to get shot of - then I'd like to know. I'm fairly close to
    its top allowed weight as well.

    They come up on eBay as well, of course.

    I had something else on my mind... no, it's gone. I'd better just
    press the "Remember" button ;-)

  2. [email hidden] wrote on 13/07/2006 03:13 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    My commuting bike - a run of a few miles twice a day - is an Electra
    Cruiser, but I'm attracted to various cheap-ish folding models for, for
    instance, getting about the town centre after a bus or train ride in -
    with the main accent on good foldability to avoid arguments with public
    transport employees. Unfortunately I'm substantially heavier than the
    specified weight limits of Clive Sinclair's A-Bike and the "JD RAZOR
    COMPACT ADULT BIKE" folder. Dismissing for now the idea of
    distributing my weight over two A-Bikes or Razors Scotch-taped
    together, I turn to the Strida. Strida 3 is said to be an easier and
    more confident ride than the previous models. So if you don't want to
    go further than a mile, tops, then how about it?

    I have heard of problems with the seat breaking on the Strida. You
    could look at the Handybike as well http://www.handybike.com/

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  3. Quoted message said:

    Strida 3 is said to be an easier and
    more confident ride than the previous models. So if you don't want to
    go further than a mile, tops, then how about it?

    A pal had a pre-3 and the advice from that (which would cover 2nd
    hand/eBay etc.) is "don't go there!". Though I read in VV that the 3 is
    considerably improved.

    Quoted message said:

    My main concern is the riding position: do you inevitably rest your
    weight on the handlebars? Unfortunately I can't do that; that's why I
    got the Cruiser - I suddenly and inescapably developed a very painful
    condition of the hands and forearms, a sort of computer RSI. But you
    sit back on the Cruiser and the handlebars sweep around in a broad U,
    so your weight isn't on your arms and your hands.

    Can't say for the Strida, though note that of other folders the Brompton
    has a relaxed upright seating position (not the new S type, mind).

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/


  4. Quoted message said:

    distance of Glasgow owns a Strida that could be tried - or one that
    they want to get shot of - then I'd like to know. I'm fairly close to
    its top allowed weight as well.

    I borrowed a strida for a few months once.It was not suitable for me at
    6ft 2to 3 and 95kg.position no good and ride horrid.But for an average
    person it seemed like a quick fold/unfold and adequate ride for a mile
    or so.
    My 12year old boy thoroughly enjoyed it, but he did not have to go far.
    When parts wear out it could be a problem.
    TerryJ

  5. Quoted message said:

    <snip>

    Strida 3 is said to be an easier and more confident ride than the previous models.
    So if you don't want to go further than a mile, tops, then how about it?

    My main concern is the riding position: do you inevitably rest your
    weight on the handlebars?

    <another snip>

    rja,

    I owned a Strida 1 for a few years. During that time I rode it
    precisely once: home from buying it. I kept it for novelty value and
    enjoyed watching my friends fail to cycle the length of my hallway on
    it. It was affectionately named 'faceplant'.

    Taking advantage of Strida's trade in to upgrade to a Strida 3, I gave
    it to a friend, who uses the Strida 3 daily.

    Although the geometry etc looks almost identical, the ride is very
    significantly improved; and I didn't find my weight is pushed forward
    at all during my briefish test-ride.

    So; the Strida 3 is streets better than the Strida 1; but I can't see
    many (any) situations in which a strida would beat a Brommie...

    my opinion only etc etc...

    M.

  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <snip>

    Strida 3 is said to be an easier and more confident ride than the previous models.
    So if you don't want to go further than a mile, tops, then how about it?

    My main concern is the riding position: do you inevitably rest your
    weight on the handlebars?

    <another snip>

    rja,

    I owned a Strida 1 for a few years. During that time I rode it
    precisely once: home from buying it. I kept it for novelty value and
    enjoyed watching my friends fail to cycle the length of my hallway on
    it. It was affectionately named 'faceplant'.

    Taking advantage of Strida's trade in to upgrade to a Strida 3, I gave
    it to a friend, who uses the Strida 3 daily.

    Although the geometry etc looks almost identical, the ride is very
    significantly improved; and I didn't find my weight is pushed forward
    at all during my briefish test-ride.

    So; the Strida 3 is streets better than the Strida 1; but I can't see
    many (any) situations in which a strida would beat a Brommie...

    my opinion only etc etc...

    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price? I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    I also have the impression, perhaps wrong, that Strida is actually
    easier to carry than Brompton, and especially when standing on a bus.
    And I'm not sure about the fold. Those who love it, do love it, I know.

  7. Quoted message said:

    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price?

    Errrr, no!

    Strida starts at £220, Bromton C3E is £400. I'd personally spend
    another £100 and go for an M3L, but we're still at well under 4 times
    the price.

    Quoted message said:

    I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    My next door neighbour bought a Brom (at £468, then the L3). He's not
    an avid cyclist by any stretch of the imagination. He estimated that it
    had paid for itsslf in purely financial terms within a year.

    Quoted message said:

    I also have the impression, perhaps wrong, that Strida is actually
    easier to carry than Brompton, and especially when standing on a bus.

    I would think so, the Brom isn't that good a /carry/. But the main
    point is you never really need to carry it very far. The Strida is also
    ahead here is your storage space is basically linear rather than cubic.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    <snip>

    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price? I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...


    Two points:

    1)
    Payback for my commuting investment considerations include (in order of
    importance).
    Time; cycling saves me almost an hour a day over public transport. (no
    parking, so driving is not an option).
    Exercise; 25 minutes a day isn't a lot; but its 25 minutes more than
    I'd otherwise get.
    Pleasure; I'd rather cycle than sniff someone else's armpits.
    Cash saved over bus fares; zero. I calculate the savings and spend that
    amount on cycling bits.

    and (2)

    either you'd use the bike daily irrespective of which you buy; in which
    case the extra comfort of the Brompton *may* be worth it.

    or
    Having the Brompton over the Strida would mean that you'd use the
    Brompton when you may not actually use the Strida. (making its value
    near zero)

    or
    You won't use either; in which case (I'm guessing) you would get back
    most of the Brompton excess spend in the second hand market.

  9. Peter Clinch said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price?

    Errrr, no!

    Strida starts at £220, Bromton C3E is £400. I'd personally spend
    another £100 and go for an M3L, but we're still at well under 4 times
    the price.

    Mmm, okay. I just remembered that when I last looked at prices for
    folding bikes beyond the simple break-in-half models, my eyes popped;
    and then Google found me a particular Brompton model going for around
    £900 - that must be the really nice one.

    Of course, without a gear shift, Strida is not suitable for going any
    very great distance. Brompton is, more so. But perhaps I didn't put
    it clearly that I do intend to keep my seven-speed Electra Cruiser -
    it's just that I can't take it on the bus!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    My next door neighbour bought a Brom (at £468, then the L3). He's not
    an avid cyclist by any stretch of the imagination. He estimated that it
    had paid for itself in purely financial terms within a year.

    Again perhaps depends on whether it's a first or a second bike... My
    work commute is theoretically forty miles in a week, 2000 in a year,
    but that's covered already! This is for nice easy jaunts into town!
    ;-)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I also have the impression, perhaps wrong, that Strida is actually
    easier to carry than Brompton, and especially when standing on a bus.

    I would think so, the Brom isn't that good a /carry/. But the main
    point is you never really need to carry it very far. The Strida is also
    ahead here if your storage space is basically linear rather than cubic.

    Thank you. It sounds like that actually could work for me, then. And
    the poor thing needs /someone/ to appreciate it ;-)

    As long as it isn't agony, or deadly peril, when you actually ride the
    thing - both of which have been alleged!

  10. [email hidden] wrote on 13/07/2006 12:37 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price? I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    In that case buy the Concept Marine folding bike. £69 for the single
    speed (i.e like the Strida) or £117 for the three speed (like the
    Brompton). Despite its cheap price it gets good reviews and is
    practical too.

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  11. Quoted message said:

    Mmm, okay. I just remembered that when I last looked at prices for
    folding bikes beyond the simple break-in-half models, my eyes popped;
    and then Google found me a particular Brompton model going for around
    £900 - that must be the really nice one.

    You can get up to £1275 for the (titanium) kitchen sink option: there's
    a price list here... http://kinetics.org.uk/html/models.shtml

    Quoted message said:

    As long as it isn't agony, or deadly peril, when you actually ride the
    thing - both of which have been alleged!

    Quite forcefully by my pal who (briefly) owned one in between Broms, but
    that was a Pre-Mk3 and I've not come across any opinions about the 3
    that don't think them considerably superior to those that came before.
    Not the same as saying the 3 is actually good, of course, but what it
    does say is it isn't fair to judge the current model from the older ones.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Tony Raven said:

    [email hidden] wrote on 13/07/2006 12:37 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price? I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    In that case buy the Concept Marine folding bike. £69 for the single
    speed (i.e like the Strida) or £117 for the three speed (like the
    Brompton). Despite its cheap price it gets good reviews and is
    practical too.

    The what now? Google seems not to have heard of it. Too many other
    matches, or none. So where do I find out about it?

    Meanwhile, www.HandyBike.com wants to run JavaScript and I don't, on
    /this/ PC, but I wonder if that is the same machine that I was calling
    "JD Razor"?

  13. quote=''Tony Raven said:

    [email hidden] wrote on 13/07/2006 12:37 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    Well, Brompton is, what, four times the price? I have in mind light
    and occasional use, and I could buy a car for Brompton money. Or to
    put it another way, hypothetical auto costs are 50p a mile (or were).
    So how many journeys before I break even...

    In that case buy the Concept Marine folding bike. £69 for the single
    speed (i.e like the Strida) or £117 for the three speed (like the
    Brompton). Despite its cheap price it gets good reviews and is
    practical too.

    The what now? Google seems not to have heard of it. Too many other
    matches, or none. So where do I find out about it?

    Meanwhile, www.HandyBike.com wants to run JavaScript and I don't, on
    /this/ PC, but I wonder if that is the same machine that I was calling
    "JD Razor"?[/QUOTE]

    That'd be because it's the Compass Marine :-) See recent thread 'Compass Folding Bike' http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.rec.cycling/browse_thread/thread/974d99aca780f014/9c5a530ec326eafe?q=marine&rnum=2#9c5a530ec326eafe

    which includes a link to http://www.compass24.com/cgi-bin/abnetshop.pl?basket=lnquebrpwvfjvni

    Bryan

  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In that case buy the Concept Marine folding bike. £69 for the single
    speed (i.e like the Strida) or £117 for the three speed (like the
    Brompton). Despite its cheap price it gets good reviews and is
    practical too.

    The what now? Google seems not to have heard of it. Too many other
    matches, or none. So where do I find out about it?

    Compass Marine, it's a re-badged Dahon I believe.

    Tom
    --
    Return address is dead. Real address is at
    http://toomanybikes.com/address.jpg

  15. In article said:


    In that case buy the Concept Marine folding bike. £69 for the single
    speed (i.e like the Strida) or £117 for the three speed (like the
    Brompton). Despite its cheap price it gets good reviews and is
    practical too.

    Do you mean Compass Marine?
    http://www.compass24.com/cgi-bin/abnetshop.pl?wahl=Bicycles_Bicycles
    lists the single speed, and a lighter weight three-speed at £243.
    I haven't checked the paper catalogue, but if the web pages are more
    up-to-date, the \xa3117 three speed might not be available, although
    http://www.atob.org.uk/price_tag.html lists it.


  16. Quoted message said:

    So; the Strida 3 is streets better than the Strida 1; but I can't see
    many (any) situations in which a strida would beat a Brommie...

    my opinion only etc etc...

    M.

    I have owned a Strida 3 now for about 15 months and love it. I have never
    tried other Strida models but I find the ride is very nice and make the ~5
    mile trip from Clapham Junction to Hammersmith in about 23mins and that is
    mainly offroad along the cycle paths etc. So it does clip along at a nice
    speed despite the lack of gears.

    The design puts you at the top of the triangular frame and intially i
    wished they had put the handlebars further forward as effectively you have
    a very short wheel base but once you have ridden it for a while you soon
    get the hang of it and it is very manoeuvrable even at slow speeds.

    When folded, you wheel the Strida around rather than carrying it which is
    nice (I did try a traditional folder for a few days and quickly got fed up
    with it banging against my legs and lugging it around the station). Also
    when there is standing room only you can lock the brakes and stand it
    upright so it takes almost no room at all (and there is no oily chain
    etc).

    I weigh ~80Kg and am 5'11 but I admit to some nervousness recently when a
    friend who is more like 95Kg and 6'2 tried it...but they do guarantee the
    frame for life.

    A Brompton is certainly a more robust item but as long as you understand
    the Strida is purely a commuter bike then I think it does very well
    indeed. Certainly I would be lost without it now.

    HTH
    Noel

    I did post something a few months ago on here too so sorry if I am
    repeating myself:

    http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.rec.cycling/tree/browse_frm/thread/dc42dd12ac0972a5/e43fb41a048b09d3?rnum=31&q=strida+noel&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fuk.rec.cycling%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fdc42dd12ac0972a5%2F92678a9b316577da%3Flnk%3Dst%26q%3Dstrida+noel%26rnum%3D1%26#doc_5fb1f2142951fc5a

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.