joelguy said:
I'm reading about how much you all love your recumbent cycles and I'm getting hyped up to go test ride everything on the market.
thanks for the inspiration, I'm not sure about the recumbent verses semi-recumbent disagreements, how much does riding terrain affect the decision in this area? In Michigan where I live we have a lot of hills, how would that affect my decision?
First, good decision on "ride them all"! One of the great things about the recumbent market is there is so much individual treatment of the basic idea. We had a ball with bent shopping, driving over 1,000 miles over several weekends.
Rode a number of brands in LWB, SWB and CLWB. Bacchetta for us, obviously others think differently.
On the climbing issue, there exists a video of a guy on a Lightening passing a bunch of DF's on a fairly nasty looking hill. Having a little over 300 miles on my Strada now I can state with some degree of accuracy that the engine, not the bike, is the major issue.
Sure, if you get some 50 lb touring LWB with full suspension you are going to be paying a penalty on the hills for all that comfort. There are alternatives if you want quick and hill climbing ability. I can raise my seat back and approximate the angles of the Lightning and really do some climbing, until my 53 year old abused cardio system stops my legs. All that is changing for the better so I am not intimidated by hills like I was at first. It's conditioning, which was a major reason for getting back into bicycles in the first place.
Put an older guy who does not have any desire to compete with a bunch of 25 year olds on hill climbing and you are likely to see some impressive spinning which requires good cardio, although he may not be burning up the inclines speedwise, watch out for the distance he will eat up in a day.
Put a Cat 1 rider on almost anything and those Cat 1 legs are going to be leaving most anyone in their wake.
Bents are great. Hope to hear your story on your new bent sometime.