For the claim that the arbitration testimony was released to LeMonde by
Pound.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Evidence Lance?
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 27 June 2006
- Last activity
- 27 June 2006
- Original author
- B. Lafferty
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 277
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
For the claim that the arbitration testimony was released to LeMonde by
Pound.Where did he claim that, Brian? Source/link, please.
--
Snippy -
"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:q9%ng.85141$A8.24982@clgrps12...Quoted message said:
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
For the claim that the arbitration testimony was released to LeMonde by
Pound.Where did he claim that, Brian? Source/link, please.
--
Snippy
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun24newsI respected the panel's unconditional prohibition against providing any
documents or testimony to others, and made no mention of this complete
victory. Others did not, as selected items have apparently been recently
released to the press. We have instituted proceedings to determine who did
so; ironically, but predictably, our investigation to date has revealed that
the only person to whom documents have been provided by any trial
participant is Richard Pound of WADA. It is indeed coincidental that the
documents provided to the press surfaced shortly after the independent
investigator from the UCI released his report which exonerated me and was
sharply critical of Mr. Pound's conduct.
http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10091.0.html -
B. Lafferty said:
"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:q9%ng.85141$A8.24982@clgrps12...Quoted message said:
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
For the claim that the arbitration testimony was released to LeMondeby
Pound.Where did he claim that, Brian? Source/link, please.
--
Snippy
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun24newsI respected the panel's unconditional prohibition against providing any
documents or testimony to others, and made no mention of this complete
victory. Others did not, as selected items have apparently been recently
released to the press. We have instituted proceedings to determine who
did
so; ironically, but predictably, our investigation to date has revealed
that
the only person to whom documents have been provided by any trial
participant is Richard Pound of WADA. It is indeed coincidental that the
documents provided to the press surfaced shortly after the independent
investigator from the UCI released his report which exonerated me and was
sharply critical of Mr. Pound's conduct.
http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10091.0.htmlThere's no link to LeMond. In other words, Armstrong never said that the
information was linked to LeMond.--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -
"Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...B. Lafferty said:
"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:q9%ng.85141$A8.24982@clgrps12...Quoted message said:
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
For the claim that the arbitration testimony was released to LeMonde by
Pound.Where did he claim that, Brian? Source/link, please.
--
Snippy
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun24newsI respected the panel's unconditional prohibition against providing any
documents or testimony to others, and made no mention of this complete
victory. Others did not, as selected items have apparently been recently
released to the press. We have instituted proceedings to determine who
did
so; ironically, but predictably, our investigation to date has revealed
that
the only person to whom documents have been provided by any trial
participant is Richard Pound of WADA. It is indeed coincidental that the
documents provided to the press surfaced shortly after the independent
investigator from the UCI released his report which exonerated me and was
sharply critical of Mr. Pound's conduct.
http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10091.0.htmlQuoted message said:
There's no link to LeMond. In other words, Armstrong never said that the
information was linked to LeMond.Are we confusing Lemond (Greg) with LeMonde (French newspaper)?
-
B. Lafferty said:
Are we confusing Lemond (Greg) with LeMonde (French newspaper)?
I knew it. Its all a conspiracy, LeMond owns LeMonde and that's why
they're pursuing LANCE. -
Lance:
Hey, yo Haven! I just scored a whole bunch of Armani evening gowns.
Take your pick. Third storefront down on your left. Go ahead. C'mon.
Third door down. Go ahead. Yeah, right in there.Haven:
Nah, that's OK Lance, I really gotta get back to the house and pick up
the kids. -
B. Lafferty said:
"Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
There's no link to LeMond. In other words, Armstrong never said that the
information was linked to LeMond.Are we confusing Lemond (Greg) with LeMonde (French newspaper)?
"Le Monde" the newspaper is two words.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.