UK and Europe · Public discussion

Espirit de corps

Started by Chris Harrison · · Last activity · 280 posts · 9,738 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 December 2003
Last activity
12 December 2003
Original author
Chris Harrison
Posts
280
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
9,738
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 280
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other?

    A cheery wave to all law-abiding types going the other way, a victory salute to all we pass (with a
    blast on the Air Zound if they are roadies and we are riding a commuter bike at the time!), and "Oi!
    Mate! Get some lights!" to the stealth brigade.

    --
    Guy
    ===
    WARNING: May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

  2. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other? I speak as someone who
    doesn't go through red lights, never rides on pavements, avoids going the wrong down one-way
    streets, generally stops on or near the front white line at junctions, always uses lights (often
    when it's not dark) and has much reflective tape, clothing and equipment.

    IMHO there is an unjustifiable "us and them" attitude in this group and it's (probably) similar in
    uk.tosspot, in which in this group (drivers == bad) and (cyclists == good) and if there is any
    description of an altercation it's generally accepted that (cyclist == in the right) and (driver ==
    in the wrong) because after all cyclists are vulnerable road users and so have a right to be
    specially protected by motorists.

    Often it is justified, but equally often it isn't. Cyclists are indeed vulnerable road users and
    motorisits have a duty of care towards them as they do towards all other road users, but no more so
    than they do towards any other road user. Motorists don't deliberately target cyclists, irrespective
    of the stories that are often told here - those same stupid motorists who star in anecdotes in here
    will be acting just as aggressively towards all other road users. As far as I can see, there is as
    much aggressive thought and behaviour towards motorists by cyclists (and indeed towards other
    cyclists) as the other way round. The difference is that a motorist in a ton of car is scarier in
    all ways to a cyclist than a cyclist on a flimsy bike is towards a motorist. Neither forms of
    aggression are in any way acceptable, though.

    If I'm honest, I probably see more examples of stupid cyclist behaviour as a percentage of cyclists
    seen than I do driver stupidity. Cycling stupidity is generally the most stupid, because the person
    who is most likely to be injured by it is the cyclist - how stupid is that, to deliberately enhance
    your own chances of being injured? It's stupider than stupidity shown by a car driver, who is far
    more likely to injure others rather than himself - note that I am not equating "less stupid" with
    "morally more acceptable" though, because of course it's far more acceptable in a moral sense to
    increase your own risk though your own stupidity than to increase someone else's risk through your
    own stupidity.

    So, no, I don't think that being a cyclist engenders in itself any particular esprit de corps with
    other cyclists. I have many things in common with many other cyclists, but then there are
    intersections of commonality as a cyclist with many motorists, and as a motorist with many cyclists,
    etc ad infinitum. I probably have a lot in common with many football supporters, too, although I've
    only ever watched half a dozen games on the TV in my life! As an Australian living in England, I
    even have something in common with the English Rugby team, but it's slipped my mind what? Oh yeah,
    that's right, I live here :-)

    Trev

  3. Quoted message said:

    It's unfair, but many motorists do tar all cyclists with the same brush and I do feel that
    people see the wrong-doers and ignore those who don't break the rules - but treat everyone as if
    they had.


    I get the impression that pointing these

    Quoted message said:

    things out to other cyclists is letting the side down - is that fair?

    I fit your description of your own cycling, and I just do not usually acknowledge the pavement or
    stealth brigade. While I would like to give them the benefit of my assessment of their poor
    judgement I am afraid that to do so volubly is seen as weirdly aggressive. And there are so many of
    them, you'd shout yourself hoarse. TerryJ

  4. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other?

    A cheery wave to all law-abiding types going the other way, a victory salute to all we pass (with a
    blast on the Air Zound if they are roadies and we are riding a commuter bike at the time!), and "Oi!
    Mate! Get some lights!" to the stealth brigade.

    --
    Guy
    ===
    WARNING: May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

  5. Quoted message said:

    It's unfair, but many motorists do tar all cyclists with the same brush and I do feel that
    people see the wrong-doers and ignore those who don't break the rules - but treat everyone as if
    they had.


    I get the impression that pointing these

    Quoted message said:

    things out to other cyclists is letting the side down - is that fair?

    I fit your description of your own cycling, and I just do not usually acknowledge the pavement or
    stealth brigade. While I would like to give them the benefit of my assessment of their poor
    judgement I am afraid that to do so volubly is seen as weirdly aggressive. And there are so many of
    them, you'd shout yourself hoarse. TerryJ

  6. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other? I speak as someone who
    doesn't go through red lights, never rides on pavements, avoids going the wrong down one-way
    streets, generally stops on or near the front white line at junctions, always uses lights (often
    when it's not dark) and has much reflective tape, clothing and equipment.

    Quoted message said:

    I consider my riding fast and assertive - while not a roadie, I do ride a decent road bike and am
    faster than 95% of the other cyclists I seem to come across on my daily commutes.

    [SNIPPED]

    Hi Chris

    When on my ATB lookalike I rarely get a wave or "cheerio" from other bike riders. However, when
    I'm riding my cheap road bike I often get a wave or a smile from others, but only those also on
    road bikes.

    I feel I am justified in commenting on other riders' behaviour but only when they endanger me.

    Slightly OT: This morning I visted my GP to have some blood removed. As I was entering the surgery I
    stopped and waited a moment to hold open the door for a late-middle-aged woman. She seemed quite
    surprised that I did so. I have no idea whether she was shocked because of my age (39 is hardly
    young) or because a cyclist should show a human side.

    James

    --
    "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" is not a satisfactory excuse.

  7. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other? I speak as someone who
    doesn't go through red lights, never rides on pavements, avoids going the wrong down one-way
    streets, generally stops on or near the front white line at junctions, always uses lights (often
    when it's not dark) and has much reflective tape, clothing and equipment.

    Quoted message said:

    I consider my riding fast and assertive - while not a roadie, I do ride a decent road bike and am
    faster than 95% of the other cyclists I seem to come across on my daily commutes.

    [SNIPPED]

    Hi Chris

    When on my ATB lookalike I rarely get a wave or "cheerio" from other bike riders. However, when
    I'm riding my cheap road bike I often get a wave or a smile from others, but only those also on
    road bikes.

    I feel I am justified in commenting on other riders' behaviour but only when they endanger me.

    Slightly OT: This morning I visted my GP to have some blood removed. As I was entering the surgery I
    stopped and waited a moment to hold open the door for a late-middle-aged woman. She seemed quite
    surprised that I did so. I have no idea whether she was shocked because of my age (39 is hardly
    young) or because a cyclist should show a human side.

    James

    --
    "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" is not a satisfactory excuse.

  8. chris harrison said:

    Just how much espirit de corps should cyclists exhibit toward each other? I speak as someone who
    doesn't go through red lights, never rides on pavements, avoids going the wrong down one-way
    streets, generally stops on or near the front white line at junctions, always uses lights (often
    when it's not dark) and has much reflective tape, clothing and equipment.

    Quoted message said:

    I consider my riding fast and assertive - while not a roadie, I do ride a decent road bike and am
    faster than 95% of the other cyclists I seem to come across on my daily commutes.

    [SNIPPED]

    Hi Chris

    When on my ATB lookalike I rarely get a wave or "cheerio" from other bike riders. However, when
    I'm riding my cheap road bike I often get a wave or a smile from others, but only those also on
    road bikes.

    I feel I am justified in commenting on other riders' behaviour but only when they endanger me.

    Slightly OT: This morning I visted my GP to have some blood removed. As I was entering the surgery I
    stopped and waited a moment to hold open the door for a late-middle-aged woman. She seemed quite
    surprised that I did so. I have no idea whether she was shocked because of my age (39 is hardly
    young) or because a cyclist should show a human side.

    James

    --
    "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" is not a satisfactory excuse.

  9. Daniel Auger said:
    chris harrison said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    I thought "assertive" cycling was more about adopting a sensible road position and cooperating
    with other road users on equal terms. ;-)

    Absolutely. But sometimes these things can be misunderstood 😉

  10. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    Ye gods, we are related ;-) But I wouldn't describe assertive cycling as being aggressive. Riding
    assertively is riding safely.

    But sometimes, the methods used to assert yourself can be misconstrued ... after all, most (maybe
    all 🙂 cars are bigger and heavier, so there's a little bit of evening up to do, first!

  11. Daniel Auger said:
    chris harrison said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    I thought "assertive" cycling was more about adopting a sensible road position and cooperating
    with other road users on equal terms. ;-)

    Absolutely. But sometimes these things can be misunderstood 😉

  12. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    Ye gods, we are related ;-) But I wouldn't describe assertive cycling as being aggressive. Riding
    assertively is riding safely.

    But sometimes, the methods used to assert yourself can be misconstrued ... after all, most (maybe
    all 🙂 cars are bigger and heavier, so there's a little bit of evening up to do, first!

  13. (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers) said:

    But I wouldn't describe assertive cycling as being aggressive. Riding assertively is riding safely.

    I ride assertively. You ride aggressively. He (she or it) rides like a complete w*nker.

    Isn't that the normal conjugation of the verb? <s>

    Pete Barrett

  14. Daniel Auger said:
    chris harrison said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    I thought "assertive" cycling was more about adopting a sensible road position and cooperating
    with other road users on equal terms. ;-)

    Absolutely. But sometimes these things can be misunderstood 😉

  15. (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers) said:

    But I wouldn't describe assertive cycling as being aggressive. Riding assertively is riding safely.

    I ride assertively. You ride aggressively. He (she or it) rides like a complete w*nker.

    Isn't that the normal conjugation of the verb? <s>

    Pete Barrett

  16. "Pete Biggs" wrote (in respone to chris harrison)

    Quoted message said:

    I think you can be satisfied with setting a "good" example yourself. I don't think you'll convert
    many "bad" cyclists by telling them off - whom in many cases aren't causing any trouble but are
    merely breaking rules, that while applying to cyclists in law, were actually designed for
    motorists. Exceptions might be having a go at those who really have caused trouble or educating
    children who genuienly don't seem to have a clue about their own safety.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So while most cyclists don't break the rules, we're all assumed to be habitual red-light-runners
    who cycle around with no light and a flagrant disregard for all traffic laws. I get the
    impression that pointing these things out to other cyclists is letting the side down
    - is that fair?

    I don't think it does any good - including to one's own blood pressure.

    Agree. I use to moan at other cyclists, but found I was just turning into Mr Grumpy. I now see
    myself as an example setter. A sort of reassurance for them - I hope my actions are saying "Look,
    it's OK to stop and wait at lights - see, I am doing it and in doing so I am displaying to motorists
    that _I_ am _also_ traffic.

    --
    Cheerful pedalling John Mallard

  17. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I say assertive, many might have it as aggressive, I'm happy to point out, very vocally and
    demonstrably, when a motorist does me wrong
    - and even sometimes when it's not so clear cut. 😉

    Ye gods, we are related ;-) But I wouldn't describe assertive cycling as being aggressive. Riding
    assertively is riding safely.

    But sometimes, the methods used to assert yourself can be misconstrued ... after all, most (maybe
    all 🙂 cars are bigger and heavier, so there's a little bit of evening up to do, first!

  18. "Pete Biggs" wrote (in respone to chris harrison)

    Quoted message said:

    I think you can be satisfied with setting a "good" example yourself. I don't think you'll convert
    many "bad" cyclists by telling them off - whom in many cases aren't causing any trouble but are
    merely breaking rules, that while applying to cyclists in law, were actually designed for
    motorists. Exceptions might be having a go at those who really have caused trouble or educating
    children who genuienly don't seem to have a clue about their own safety.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So while most cyclists don't break the rules, we're all assumed to be habitual red-light-runners
    who cycle around with no light and a flagrant disregard for all traffic laws. I get the
    impression that pointing these things out to other cyclists is letting the side down
    - is that fair?

    I don't think it does any good - including to one's own blood pressure.

    Agree. I use to moan at other cyclists, but found I was just turning into Mr Grumpy. I now see
    myself as an example setter. A sort of reassurance for them - I hope my actions are saying "Look,
    it's OK to stop and wait at lights - see, I am doing it and in doing so I am displaying to motorists
    that _I_ am _also_ traffic.

    --
    Cheerful pedalling John Mallard

  19. "Mark Thompson" <[email hidden] (change warm for hot)> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I set an example when I jump red lights by dismounting and walking past


    'em,

    Quoted message said:

    then remounting the other side. Makes a nice balance between speed and


    the

    Quoted message said:

    law, and /really/ annoys the car drivers - I've got ahead of 'em without cheating!

    You don't ride through Virginia Water sometimes, do you? There's a guy who rides there who does
    exactly what you describe. I keep passing him and then he walks his bike across the lights when
    they're on red. It really annoys me - and I'm on a bike!
    ___
    Michael MacClancy

  20. "Trevor Barton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    snipped very wise post.

    As an Australian living in England,

    Quoted message said:

    I even have something in common with the English Rugby team, but it's slipped my mind what? Oh
    yeah, that's right, I live here :-)

    You might have something else in common with them ...... you'd all rather be living somewhere warmer
    right now ;-)
    ___
    Michael MacClancy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.