Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

ERgo ten to nine conversion

Started by Msctrose · · Last activity · 11 posts · 520 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
Msctrose
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
520
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have converted an eight speed record ergo shifter to nine,
    using a disc for the 2001 levers. It works flawlessly as a
    nine speed lever, all I have changed is the indexing disc.

    I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was thinking about
    putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I read on the
    Branford bike site that I would also need to change the
    racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my other
    conversion. Is this really necessary? The rachet disc just
    rachets, not indexes, so I would think that any rachet
    movement would be the same.

    Thanks for any input. Mark

  2. msctrose-<< I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was
    thinking about putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I
    read on the Branford bike site that I would also need to
    change the racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my
    other >><BR><BR>

    No it's not necessary...why branford says this along with
    some of the other stuff tells me they don't try it before
    they spout the 'company line'.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  3. (MSCTROSE) said:

    I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was thinking about
    putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I read on the
    Branford bike site that I would also need to change the
    racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my other
    conversion. Is this really necessary? The rachet disc just
    rachets, not indexes, so I would think that any rachet
    movement would be the same.

    If you have a 10sp ratchet, you don't need the ratchet disk.
    If you have a 9sp ratchet disk and go to 10sp, without the
    10 sp ratchet, the throw of the lever between shifts gets
    out of sync but works fine. I haven't replaced a ratchet yet
    and didn't know anything about it until 10 days or so ago.

    If you didn't know, you'd be hard pressed to find the
    difference.

  4. Quoted message said:

    Paul Kopit [email hidden] Writes:

    Quoted message said:

    If you have a 10sp ratchet, you don't need the ratchet
    disk. If you have a 9sp ratchet disk and go to 10sp,
    without the 10 sp ratchet, the throw of the lever between
    shifts gets out of sync but works fine. I haven't replaced
    a ratchet yet and didn't know anything about it until 10
    days or so ago.

    I'm sure this has been covered berfore but... is it possible
    to convert '98 Record ergo to 10 speed? I think mine are '98
    or perhaps '97 or even '96. I converted them from 8 speed to
    9 speed years ago. Can I go to 10?

  5. VCopelan said:

    is it possible to convert '98 Record ergo to 10 speed? I
    think mine are '98 or perhaps '97 or even '96. I converted
    them from 8 speed to 9 speed years ago. Can I go to 10?

    If they were 8-speed to start with, they're '96 or earlier.
    '97 levers were 9-speed with the old hood shape. '98 Record
    had the new shape hood with aluminium levers. 1999 saw
    carbon levers.

    You can convert the lever to 10-speed, but not by simply
    replacing the ratchet. You need to replace most of the
    innards. Unless you have a very strong preference for the
    old hood shape, it's probably not worth the cost.

    James Thomson

  6. MSCTROSE said:

    I have converted an eight speed record ergo shifter to
    nine, using a disc for the 2001 levers. It works
    flawlessly as a nine speed lever, all I have changed is
    the indexing disc.

    Do you mean the EC-RE133?

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was thinking about
    putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I read on the
    Branford bike site that I would also need to change the
    racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my other
    conversion. Is this really necessary? The rachet disc just
    rachets, not indexes, so I would think that any rachet
    movement would be the same.

    Why do the 2001 9 and 10-speed Chorus right hand Ergos have
    different ratcheting discs? If they don't do anything
    different, why does Campagnolo bother?

    ~PB

  7. MSCTROSE said:

    I have converted an eight speed record ergo shifter to
    nine, using a disc for the 2001 levers. It works
    flawlessly as a nine speed lever, all I have changed is
    the indexing disc.

    I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was thinking about
    putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I read on the
    Branford bike site that I would also need to change the
    racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my other
    conversion. Is this really necessary? The rachet disc just
    rachets, not indexes, so I would think that any rachet
    movement would be the same.

    Ratchet movement might be the same but what about amount of
    lever movement required to get that? Wouldn't the proper
    disc reduce the amount you'd have to push the lever to get a
    click, or is it the other way round?

    I really don't believe Campag have two versions for no
    reason as they like to share parts whenever possible.

    ~PB

  8. Quoted message said:
    MSCTROSE said:

    I have converted an eight speed record ergo shifter to
    nine, using a disc for the 2001 levers. It works
    flawlessly as a nine speed lever, all I have changed is
    the indexing disc.

    I have a Chorus ten speed lever, and was thinking about
    putting the nine speed disc in that lever. I read on the
    Branford bike site that I would also need to change the
    racheting disc, which I did not have to do for my other
    conversion.

    8-speed and 2001 9-speed cable ratio is different, whereas
    it's the same for 2001 9-speed and 10-speed.

    ~PB

  9. Pete I am not sure if the part i have is the ec part number
    you mention.

    I do have a question, tho, if the cable actuation for 01
    nine and ten speed is the same, could you just use a ten
    speed lever with a nine speed cassette, and just adjust out
    the bottom or top index position? Mark

  10. vcopeland-<< I'm sure this has been covered berfore but...
    is it possible to convert '98 Record ergo to 10 speed?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    If old shape or 1998 (first year of new shape), it is
    possible to convert to 10sd but you need almost the entire
    innards, front to back. In 1999, they went to Ergobrain
    innards, that changed the way the whole thing is held
    together, then to 10s in 2000.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  11. MSCTROSE said:

    Pete I am not sure if the part i have is the ec part
    number you mention.

    Part numbers can be found on the Spare Parts section of
    Campagnolo.com.

    Quoted message said:

    I do have a question, tho, if the cable actuation for 01
    nine and ten speed is the same, could you just use a ten
    speed lever with a nine speed cassette, and just adjust
    out the bottom or top index position?

    No because 10sp lever pulls less cable per index click
    than 01 9sp lever. It's just that the 10sp derailleur
    travels by the same amount per mm of cable pulled as the
    01 9sp derailleur (in fact the new 9 and 10sp derailleurs
    are virtually the same things). That's not the case with
    01 9sp and 8sp.

    I thought that might be relevant somehow to explaining why a
    different modfification is required for 8-to-9 than 10-to-
    new9. I must admit that I can't quite get my head round all
    the math.... just throwing some ideas and facts into the mix
    in case it helps you and others to figure it out.

    ~PB

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.