The Real Bev said:Leo Lichtman said:
"Alex88" wrote: (clip) the cyclop is convex, is a good or a bad thing?
(clip)
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Convex is a GOOD thing. It's not so much that it makes things appear
smaller, which it does, but it increases your angle of view. With a flat
mirror you would have to lean to various positions to scan the scene behind
you, which would be difficult, and would never assure you that you have
really taken in everything. In fact, I cannot recall ever seeing a flat
bar-end mirror--I'll bet they are not even available.
I've got one. Rhode Gear, I think, and it has a rubber thing shoved
into the bar which I have replaced with a grommet. Unfortunately it
doesn't bend far enough inward, and it rotates in the bar way too easily
so whenever I want to use it I have to hold it with my hand. There
really ought to be a better design.
I also have the Rhode Gear, and also had the 'bend' and 'rotate'
problems. I finally fixed the rotate problem by adding some teflon
pipe thread tape to the ball head threads and then securely tightening
with pliers. I then bent the rear blades against the handlebar and
secured it first with some non-elastic strapping tape, and then
covered that with black electricians tape. Now, a week later, both
problems are gone.
Quoted message said:
I hate convex mirrors -- I can HEAR that there's a car behind me, I just
want to know exactly how far away it is, and looking over my shoulder
shifts my balance in a way that might put me under the wheels of a
cement truck one day. No, if I haven't been able to avoid this after
15,000 miles I probably won't be able to do it next week either.
Quoted message said:A flat helmet mirror is OK, because, being close to your eye, it provides a
larger angle of view. Also, you can scan by just turning or tilting your
head.
About the same time, a week ago, as I went to work on the Rhode Gear
mirror, I retrieved a Take-a-look eyeglass mirror that had been lying
around unused for a few years. Secured it to my sunglasses and went
out for a lengthy ride.
Now with both handlebar and sunglass mirrors I was able to make a
direct comparison. The convex handlebar mirror deceives one into
believing that there is more time before the car is alongside, and the
eyeglass mirror gives an accurate rendition of the approaching
vehicle. The eyeglass mirror is bright and gives a feeling of
'immediacy with the ability to see behind without head movement;,
whereas the Rhode gear is tinted, smaller imaged, and takes a much
bigger sweep of the head/eyes to secure information.
I am going to continue to test both mirrors, but my feeling right now
is that I may remove the handlebar mirror. I do find the eyeglass
mirror dangling on the side of my head to be somewhat annoying.
Perhaps it is just a matter of acclimation.