Eddy on rollers

Howard Kveck said:

RicodJour said:

I'll raise your Stella with a Taddy Porter.

Hmm, I've never had one of those. There goes my LIVEDRUNK cred!

But I have had a Leopard Lager in a glass bottle though. That seems to be gone.

Hie thee to a purveyor of all things hop!
http://www.merchantduvin.com/pages/5_breweries/samsmith_taddy.html

R

RicodJour said:

Howard Kveck said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

RicodJour said:

On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <[email hidden]> wrote:
> RicodJour <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> easier to
> stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! 😉

Quoted message said:

I have no problems whatsoever saying that, on that count, you are pretty much
correct. Sad but true...

Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:

You post something serious.
I post a cheeky reply.
You post a smart alecky comeback.
I take a pot shot at you.
You call my heritage into question.
I insult your sister.
You insult my mother.
I bust you one in the mouth.
You bust me one in the mouth.
Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.

It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. 😉

Actually it's more like:

You post something stupid.
Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
posting.
You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
included
He posts as if he rides a bike
You post as if you ride a bike
You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.

Quoted message said:

RicodJour said:

Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:

Quoted message said:

You post something serious.
I post a cheeky reply.
You post a smart alecky comeback.
I take a pot shot at you.
You call my heritage into question.
I insult your sister.
You insult my mother.
I bust you one in the mouth.
You bust me one in the mouth.
Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.

Quoted message said:

It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. 😉

Actually it's more like:

You post something stupid.
Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
posting.
You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
included
He posts as if he rides a bike
You post as if you ride a bike
You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.

Utter [censored]. I don't always post first.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.

R

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

Actually it's more like:

You post something stupid.
Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
posting.
You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
included
He posts as if he rides a bike
You post as if you ride a bike
You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.

You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here, don't you,
Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can tell you
how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here without you
snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that shouldn't
be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes you.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

in message <[email hidden]>,

RicodJour (') said:

I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564

Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
cycling.

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

'You cannot put "The Internet" into the Recycle Bin.'

Howard Kveck said:

You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here, don't you,
Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can tell you
how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here without you
snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that shouldn't
be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes you.

You left out...
Neener, neener, neener.

I'm not sure which I prefer less - obsessive negativity directed
solely towards one retired rider, or free-floating negativity that
spews forth coating everything with miasmic effluence. Viewed through
the con-tagonist's eyes, I'd have to go with the former. At least
that way there is some chance of being happy.

R

Simon Brooke said:

in message <[email hidden]>,

RicodJour (') said:

I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564

Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
cycling.

Except for the alternate universe in which he doesn't fully recover from cancer
- over there the cover of the bike magazines say "Learn to pound the big gears
like 5 time tour winner Jan."

Ron

RonSonic said:

Simon Brooke said:

in message <[email hidden]>,
RicodJour ([email hidden]'😉 wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564

Quoted message said:

Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
cycling.

Except for the alternate universe in which he doesn't fully recover from cancer
- over there the cover of the bike magazines say "Learn to pound the big gears
like 5 time tour winner Jan."

Ron

I know that universe. It's the same one where everyone is wondering
who will join Poulidor and Zoetmelk as a 7 time Tour winner.

In article <[email hidden]>,

RicodJour said:

Howard Kveck said:

You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here,
don't you,
Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can
tell you
how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here
without you
snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that
shouldn't
be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes
you.

You left out...
Neener, neener, neener.

I was trying to keep it civil, you know.

Quoted message said:

I'm not sure which I prefer less - obsessive negativity directed
solely towards one retired rider, or free-floating negativity that
spews forth coating everything with miasmic effluence. Viewed through
the con-tagonist's eyes, I'd have to go with the former. At least
that way there is some chance of being happy.

Oh yeah, the obsession with one ex-rider deal is strange but probaby not harmful
to anyone but the obsessor (though it can be a little annoying to many other people).
The all hate, all the time way of life is unhealthy all the way around.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?