Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Ed Dolan Protests

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 17 posts · 737 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
9 September 2005
Last activity
17 September 2005
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
737
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do to like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you would
    like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just post
    your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will thrive.

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  2. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Here is my message corrected:

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do NOT like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you
    would like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just
    post your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will
    thrive.

    It never ceases to amaze me how these little glitches get by me. I want my
    posts to be at least as letter perfect as Tom Sherman's. I think my main
    problem is that I am in a rage most of the time when I am posting to ARBR. I
    will have to up my vino intake to mellow me out.

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do to like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you
    would like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just
    post your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will
    thrive.

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  3. Don't make me laugh! Ed Dolan's favorite topic is Ed Dolan. Do you realize
    the hypocracy of starting a thread about yourself whose supposed subject is
    that you don't want a thread about yourself?

    You go out of your way to turn the threads into the topic of Ed Dolan. Take
    for example your rant in the thread on differentials: You weren't asked your
    opinion about quads. The thread had nothing to do with your opinion about
    motor vehicles and the price of gas either. But you decided to insert your
    idiotic opinions someplace where they didn't belong.

    I thought you conservative types were men of your word. If you are a man of
    your word then leave like you said you would. Otherwise stop pretending to
    have any character at all.

    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do to like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you
    would like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just
    post your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will
    thrive.

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  4. On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 15:14:58 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do to like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you would
    like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just post
    your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will thrive.

    Ed didn't you start the 'Milestone day for Ed Dolan' thread? And now
    you don't like your name in the topic?

    Give me a break.

    I can't believe your really bothered when your favorite subject comes
    up so visibly. After all, you are the one trying to change this group
    from being about recumbents (remember those?) to Mr. Ed's playhouse.

    Indiana Mike

  5. "Jeff Grippe" <jeff@door7> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Don't make me laugh! Ed Dolan's favorite topic is Ed Dolan. Do you realize
    the hypocracy of starting a thread about yourself whose supposed subject
    is that you don't want a thread about yourself?

    I do not start threads about myself. Others do that. I am protesting this.

    Quoted message said:

    You go out of your way to turn the threads into the topic of Ed Dolan.
    Take for example your rant in the thread on differentials: You weren't
    asked your opinion about quads. The thread had nothing to do with your
    opinion about motor vehicles and the price of gas either. But you decided
    to insert your idiotic opinions someplace where they didn't belong.

    Anyone who is interested in quads on ARBR is an idiot. I am only trying to
    save him from his own idiocy. My opinion about the price of gas and motor
    vehicles is a freebie which I offer to the group out of the brilliance of my
    mind. I ought to be charging for the service that I am providing to this
    group of morons known as ARBR of which you are a charter member.

    Quoted message said:

    I thought you conservative types were men of your word. If you are a man
    of your word then leave like you said you would. Otherwise stop pretending
    to have any character at all.

    I will leave this group when it stops talking about me. Do you think that
    day will ever arrive?

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  6. Edward Dolan said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject...
    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column....

    Certain post/threads about people have been perfectly valid for
    alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent. For example, there has been discussion
    about John Schlitter leaving RANS, Rich Pinto joining X-Eyed/Bacchetta
    and Gardner Martin's death.
    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

  7. "Mike Rice" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 15:14:58 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do not like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you
    would
    like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just
    post
    your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will thrive.

    Ed didn't you start the 'Milestone day for Ed Dolan' thread? And now
    you don't like your name in the topic?

    Well, that was a very special occasion. Anytime anyone can top Tom Sherman
    is a day to note. Please note now that he has returned to ARBR how he posts
    one liners. I never do that because I always have many things to say to all
    the idiots that infest this newsgroup. I am prolix if nothing else.

    If you will examine my posts overall, you will discover that I am primarily
    a responder. I almost never initiate a subject thread. Tom Sherman is like
    this too and I like him for this. If we wanted to, Tom Sherman and I could
    completely dominate this newsgroup and in effect destroy it. But we both
    have regard for our fellow recumbent cyclists and so we do not allow our
    egos to run amuck. We both want ARBR to prosper. I assume you want that too.

    Quoted message said:

    Give me a break.

    I can't believe your really bothered when your favorite subject comes
    up so visibly. After all, you are the one trying to change this group
    from being about recumbents (remember those?) to Mr. Ed's playhouse.

    No, I do not want that at all. I want to discuss serious subjects seriously.
    It can either be on topic or off topic. That is why I throw out so many
    outrageous statements. I am a Great Fisherman but there are no fish here on
    ARBR at the present moment except for the likes of JimXXX and Jeff Grippe,
    both of whom are not worthy of me. It is a burden that I have to bear for
    being so Great.

    I will say this much. I am primarily involved with housekeeping duties here
    on ARBR. I think that may come from my background as a college librarian.
    Every newsgroup needs someone like me who will keep an eagle eye on things
    and not let the group degenerate into mindless banter and terminal boredom.
    I am death on mindless banter. If you want to chit-chat with someone, then
    go to email and spare the rest of us your idiocies.

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  8. "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Edward Dolan said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject...
    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column....

    Certain post/threads about people have been perfectly valid for
    alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent. For example, there has been discussion
    about John Schlitter leaving RANS, Rich Pinto joining X-Eyed/Bacchetta
    and Gardner Martin's death.
    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

    Agreed!

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  9. Hey guys -

    More TROLL-related errata, wrongheaded rationalizations
    and rabid rambling:

    Quoted message said:

    Just post your message on a subject without any name...

    I rarely call the TROLL by name.
    Ironic'ly my stated aim
    Was to extinguish that strange thrill
    He seems to get when someone will.
    The TROLL, who thinks he's pretty slick,
    Has stooped to old Brer Rabbit's trick.
    But I suspect that there's a catch;
    Did he say, "Not the briar patch!"?

    Quoted message said:

    I do not like words run together... Using separate
    words is always a superior way of writing whether
    technically correct or not.

    Car rot is rust and crumbling plastic,
    And though the TROLL may wax bombastic
    With weasel words more trite than cute,
    It's not a crunchy orange root.

    Quoted message said:

    If we wanted to, Tom Sherman and I could completely
    dominate this newsgroup and in effect destroy it.

    The TROLL (who never will retire)
    Now threatens he could set a fire,
    While stomping through this blackened site
    That he burned down with smug delight.

    At least old Nero played a tune,
    But all we got from this buffoon
    Was repetitious, raunchy rants
    On women, New York Jews and France.

    If this TROLL wants his threat to scare,
    He really ought to be aware:
    It's hard to frighten anyone
    About what you've already done.

    Quoted message said:

    Women have very many virtues, but... I like purple...
    Look for hidden meanings and mysterious allusions.

    That meaning isn't hidden well;
    I think it's clear as any bell.
    Old TROLLs that don't like girls, but do
    Feel drawn to mingled red and blue,
    Roll out their bikes for big parades,
    Collecting funds to combat AIDS[1].

    [1] Please note: AIDS is an acronym,
    But 'PC' isn't. On a whim,
    Another prim pedantic putz
    Mislabeled that term (Such a klutz!)

    Quoted message said:

    ... we do not allow our egos to run amuck...

    By that last word the TROLL might mean
    'Amok' (a variant I've seen),
    Or maybe meaning 'through the muck',
    A quite specific kind of yuck,
    "Soft moist farmyard manure" in fact
    Says one website, to be exact.
    "Mysterious allusions" seem
    To echo his primary theme...

    Quoted message said:

    I spent 4 years in the US Navy... I think it is almost
    impossible for the highly educated like myself to ever
    communicate with the high school crowd who thought that
    college was only for snobs.

    That high school crowd and college snobs,
    And those of us who've worked at jobs
    Are very different, it's true,

    Quoted message said:

    From learned TROLLS, who learned to do


    Without the joys and thrills of sex
    At sea, except on lower decks
    With coxswains, seamen and the like.
    I think I'd rather ride my trike.

    Quoted message said:

    My post was all about Tom Sherman and is
    directed to him, not to you. [Who? Us?]

    If some TROLL wants to talk to Tom,
    His Bosun's Mate or either's mom,
    Why not use email, sparing us
    The rantings of a grizzled cuss
    Who can't remember what he typed
    Last Tuesday, or if he has wiped
    Upon completion of a post
    Which leaves us ARBR readers grossed?

    Quoted message said:

    Think of me as you would think of Shakespeare
    and you will began [sic] to glean my profundity.

    Was that a mistype of "be Gin"?
    "Mysterious allusion"? [GRIN]
    This TROLL's pro-fun-dity's been gleaned;
    No fun was found as it was screened,
    But this conclusion has been drawn:
    Begin, began, begun - begone!

    Regards,
    Wayne

  10. On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 15:14:58 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I believe it is highly inappropriate to have a thread about a person. A
    thread should always be about a subject. I am able and willing to discuss
    any subject under the sun, but I do to like to be put in the position of
    having to defend myself as a person all the time. Ask yourself how you would
    like it.

    When you post a message which has a person as the subject, you are doing
    nothing but reducing ARBR to a gossip column. We do not want that. Just post
    your message on a subject without any name and this newsgroup will thrive.

    The irony boggles.

    jim

  11. Jeff Grippe' jeff@door7 said:

    Don't make me laugh! Ed Dolan's favorite topic is Ed Dolan. Do you realize
    the hypocracy of starting a thread about yourself whose supposed subject is
    that you don't want a thread about yourself?

    You go out of your way to turn the threads into the topic of Ed Dolan.

    And that is a mere manifestation of his insecurity at that.

    jim

  12. On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:11:18 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Jeff Grippe" <jeff@door7> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Don't make me laugh! Ed Dolan's favorite topic is Ed Dolan. Do you realize
    the hypocracy of starting a thread about yourself whose supposed subject
    is that you don't want a thread about yourself?

    I do not start threads about myself. Others do that. I am protesting this.

    This thread makes a liar out of you. So now we can call you a liar and
    not be calling you names, merely stating a fact.

    Quoted message said:

    I will leave this group when it stops talking about me. Do you think that
    day will ever arrive?

    About a soon as you can stop talking about yourself (that should be
    sometims about the twelfth of never as best I can judge). But hey, if
    you hold your breath, it might happen then.

    jim

  13. "LoGo USA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey guys -

    More TROLL-related errata, wrongheaded rationalizations
    and rabid rambling:

    Quoted message said:

    Just post your message on a subject without any name...

    I rarely call the TROLL by name.
    Ironic'ly my stated aim
    Was to extinguish that strange thrill
    He seems to get when someone will.
    The TROLL, who thinks he's pretty slick,
    Has stooped to old Brer Rabbit's trick.
    But I suspect that there's a catch;
    Did he say, "Not the briar patch!"?

    I am not interested in any kind of discussion about me. What I throw out
    always is a subject which others can take or leave.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I do not like words run together... Using separate
    words is always a superior way of writing whether
    technically correct or not.

    Car rot is rust and crumbling plastic,
    And though the TROLL may wax bombastic
    With weasel words more trite than cute,
    It's not a crunchy orange root.

    Quoted message said:

    If we wanted to, Tom Sherman and I could completely
    dominate this newsgroup and in effect destroy it.

    The TROLL (who never will retire)
    Now threatens he could set a fire,
    While stomping through this blackened site
    That he burned down with smug delight.

    At least old Nero played a tune,
    But all we got from this buffoon
    Was repetitious, raunchy rants
    On women, New York Jews and France.

    If this TROLL wants his threat to scare,
    He really ought to be aware:
    It's hard to frighten anyone
    About what you've already done.

    You need to compare my posts over the years with those of a true troll. A
    true troll will NEVER be responsive whereas I am ALWAYS responsive. Big
    difference!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Women have very many virtues, but... I like purple...
    Look for hidden meanings and mysterious allusions.

    That meaning isn't hidden well;
    I think it's clear as any bell.
    Old TROLLs that don't like girls, but do
    Feel drawn to mingled red and blue,
    Roll out their bikes for big parades,
    Collecting funds to combat AIDS[1].

    Women are not worth discussing on this newsgroup since there aren't any
    here.

    Quoted message said:

    [1] Please note: AIDS is an acronym,
    But 'PC' isn't. On a whim,
    Another prim pedantic putz
    Mislabeled that term (Such a klutz!)

    I will always defer to Tom Sherman when it come to peccadilloes. However,
    you are right there along side him. I am in the business of thinking big
    thoughts. The both of you are in the business of thinking little thoughts.
    Big difference!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ... we do not allow our egos to run amuck...

    By that last word the TROLL might mean
    'Amok' (a variant I've seen),
    Or maybe meaning 'through the muck',
    A quite specific kind of yuck,
    "Soft moist farmyard manure" in fact
    Says one website, to be exact.
    "Mysterious allusions" seem
    To echo his primary theme...

    Quoted message said:

    I spent 4 years in the US Navy... I think it is almost
    impossible for the highly educated like myself to ever
    communicate with the high school crowd who thought that
    college was only for snobs.

    That high school crowd and college snobs,
    And those of us who've worked at jobs
    Are very different, it's true,

    Quoted message said:

    From learned TROLLS, who learned to do


    Without the joys and thrills of sex
    At sea, except on lower decks
    With coxswains, seamen and the like.
    I think I'd rather ride my trike.

    Those who work hard also play hard. Their idea of play is to get drunk, get
    in a fight and get screwed - not necessarily in that order. You are welcome
    to that crew of morons.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My post was all about Tom Sherman and is
    directed to him, not to you. [Who? Us?]

    If some TROLL wants to talk to Tom,
    His Bosun's Mate or either's mom,
    Why not use email, sparing us
    The rantings of a grizzled cuss
    Who can't remember what he typed
    Last Tuesday, or if he has wiped
    Upon completion of a post
    Which leaves us ARBR readers grossed?

    Although directed to Tom Sherman, there was enough fodder there to interest
    any others who have the necessary brains to pick up on it. I steer clear of
    banter on Usenet except on the rarest of occasions.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Think of me as you would think of Shakespeare
    and you will began [sic] to glean my profundity.

    Was that a mistype of "be Gin"?
    "Mysterious allusion"? [GRIN]
    This TROLL's pro-fun-dity's been gleaned;
    No fun was found as it was screened,
    But this conclusion has been drawn:
    Begin, began, begun - begone!

    Excellent last stanza!

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, Edward Dolan

    Quoted message said:

    "LoGo USA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey guys -

    More TROLL-related errata, wrongheaded rationalizations
    and rabid rambling:

    Quoted message said:

    Just post your message on a subject without any name...

    I rarely call the TROLL by name.
    Ironic'ly my stated aim
    Was to extinguish that strange thrill
    He seems to get when someone will.
    The TROLL, who thinks he's pretty slick,
    Has stooped to old Brer Rabbit's trick.
    But I suspect that there's a catch;
    Did he say, "Not the briar patch!"?

    I am not interested in any kind of discussion about me. What I throw out
    always is a subject which others can take or leave.

    Thats Laughable.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I do not like words run together... Using separate
    words is always a superior way of writing whether
    technically correct or not.

    Car rot is rust and crumbling plastic,
    And though the TROLL may wax bombastic
    With weasel words more trite than cute,
    It's not a crunchy orange root.

    Quoted message said:

    If we wanted to, Tom Sherman and I could completely
    dominate this newsgroup and in effect destroy it.

    The TROLL (who never will retire)
    Now threatens he could set a fire,
    While stomping through this blackened site
    That he burned down with smug delight.

    At least old Nero played a tune,
    But all we got from this buffoon
    Was repetitious, raunchy rants
    On women, New York Jews and France.

    If this TROLL wants his threat to scare,
    He really ought to be aware:
    It's hard to frighten anyone
    About what you've already done.

    You need to compare my posts over the years with those of a true troll. A
    true troll will NEVER be responsive whereas I am ALWAYS responsive. Big
    difference!

    You are a true troll and you do respond to almost any post as long as
    it will keep you here longer.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Women have very many virtues, but... I like purple...
    Look for hidden meanings and mysterious allusions.

    That meaning isn't hidden well;
    I think it's clear as any bell.
    Old TROLLs that don't like girls, but do
    Feel drawn to mingled red and blue,
    Roll out their bikes for big parades,
    Collecting funds to combat AIDS[1].

    Women are not worth discussing on this newsgroup since there aren't any
    here.

    If that is the case then why do you persist on making stupid, ignorant
    comments about women?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [1] Please note: AIDS is an acronym,
    But 'PC' isn't. On a whim,
    Another prim pedantic putz
    Mislabeled that term (Such a klutz!)

    I will always defer to Tom Sherman when it come to peccadilloes. However,
    you are right there along side him. I am in the business of thinking big
    thoughts. The both of you are in the business of thinking little thoughts.
    Big difference!

    I've always thought of you as provincial.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ... we do not allow our egos to run amuck...

    By that last word the TROLL might mean
    'Amok' (a variant I've seen),
    Or maybe meaning 'through the muck',
    A quite specific kind of yuck,
    "Soft moist farmyard manure" in fact
    Says one website, to be exact.
    "Mysterious allusions" seem
    To echo his primary theme...

    Quoted message said:

    I spent 4 years in the US Navy... I think it is almost
    impossible for the highly educated like myself to ever
    communicate with the high school crowd who thought that
    college was only for snobs.

    That high school crowd and college snobs,
    And those of us who've worked at jobs
    Are very different, it's true,

    Quoted message said:

    From learned TROLLS, who learned to do


    Without the joys and thrills of sex
    At sea, except on lower decks
    With coxswains, seamen and the like.
    I think I'd rather ride my trike.

    Those who work hard also play hard. Their idea of play is to get drunk, get
    in a fight and get screwed - not necessarily in that order. You are welcome
    to that crew of morons.

    Well you got the first two down pat.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My post was all about Tom Sherman and is
    directed to him, not to you. [Who? Us?]

    If some TROLL wants to talk to Tom,
    His Bosun's Mate or either's mom,
    Why not use email, sparing us
    The rantings of a grizzled cuss
    Who can't remember what he typed
    Last Tuesday, or if he has wiped
    Upon completion of a post
    Which leaves us ARBR readers grossed?

    Although directed to Tom Sherman, there was enough fodder there to interest
    any others who have the necessary brains to pick up on it. I steer clear of
    banter on Usenet except on the rarest of occasions.

    This is Ed Dolan trying to make a funny.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Think of me as you would think of Shakespeare
    and you will began [sic] to glean my profundity.

    Was that a mistype of "be Gin"?
    "Mysterious allusion"? [GRIN]
    This TROLL's pro-fun-dity's been gleaned;
    No fun was found as it was screened,
    But this conclusion has been drawn:
    Begin, began, begun - begone!

    Excellent last stanza!

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

    Still here I see.

  15. "Slugger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Edward Dolan
    <[email hidden]> wrote:


    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Women are not worth discussing on this newsgroup since there aren't any
    here.

    If that is the case then why do you persist on making stupid, ignorant
    comments about women?

    I could go on a great length about women and their many deficiencies, but I
    only mention them in passing when the occasion presents itself.

    The only men who are fit to comment on women are Catholic priests and Great
    Saints like myself. Anyone who is personally involved with women on an
    intimate basis is automatically disqualified from ever saying anything
    intelligent about them. They have been corrupted and compromised beyond
    repair. That is what comes of too close association with women.

    Maybe Slugger could tell us what he thinks of women so we could all have a
    good laugh.

    --
    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  16. On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:53:30 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I could go on a great length about women and their many deficiencies, but I
    only mention them in passing when the occasion presents itself.

    Which is everytime you are feeling insecure.

    Quoted message said:

    The only men who are fit to comment on women are Catholic priests and Great
    Saints like myself. Anyone who is personally involved with women on an
    intimate basis is automatically disqualified from ever saying anything
    intelligent about them.

    Is that code for no woman would ever want to have anything to do with
    you? Seems like it. Can't blame them either.

    jim

  17. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The only men who are fit to comment on women are Catholic priests and
    Great
    Saints like myself. Anyone who is personally involved with women on an
    intimate basis is automatically disqualified from ever saying anything
    intelligent about them.

    Is that code for no woman would ever want to have anything to do with
    you? Seems like it. Can't blame them either.

    Johnny ReBike sez - eddie boy needs to shower and do laundry, or he scares
    aways women faster than NoCom goes downhill.

    --
    Johnny ReBike
    ReBike - Slowest Bike in the Known Universe

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.