Ed Dolan, GET A JOB

"Bentracer and Bentrider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Is it Mr. or Miss or Mrs. Ed Dolan
i and others think you should get a REAL job and get the F$$$ out of
here.
as we all know,you are a GEORGE BUSH fan after all.
com'on admit to it you jerk.
we also know that you are a two face trader
if you really need something to,we all know what we can have you
do,sorry you might bite it off.

F*** you too Bent-ass!

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Good come back

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good come back

Seems everyone is tired of that useless loser Dolan.
Anyone posting as much nonsense as he does has some kind of problem.

"Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:lTPMf.76902$sa3.57241@pd7tw1no...

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Good come back

Seems everyone is tired of that useless loser Dolan.
Anyone posting as much nonsense as he does has some kind of problem.

Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something intelligent and
civil you will most likely get that back. Say something stupid and rude, and
you will most assuredly get that back.

But what does Fab have to say for himself. We surely do not want him back
here baiting all the Freds about how fast he is and how slow they are. That
very quickly got tiresome in the extreme. Fab was a one note Johnny who was
only able to amuse idiots. Even Mr. Sherman got tired of him.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"Bentracer and Bentrider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Is it Mr. or Miss or Mrs. Ed Dolan
i and others think you should get a REAL job and get the F$$$ out of
here.
as we all know,you are a GEORGE BUSH fan after all.
com'on admit to it you jerk.
we also know that you are a two face trader
if you really need something to,we all know what we can have you
do,sorry you might bite it off.

Folks, Bent-ass is a Monkey Islander. As such he is strictly into
salaciousness. That is their idea of wit and humor. You may judge for
yourself since you have an example of it before you above.

I am often at my wit's end to know how to respond to such scofflaws. I am
always thinking if I go for the jugular, what will Mr. Sherman think of me.
Yes, I care what he thinks of me because I know him to be intelligent and
fair minded. I will often pull my punches because of him.

It is easy to get low down and dirty. It is what we men do best. We can all
do it, but that does that mean we should do it. I have noted that Mr.
Sherman does not do it ever. As I have modeled myself after Mr. Sherman from
day one as to the form of my posts, I believe I will stick with him on this.
However, I am sorely tempted to go ballistic which only I know how to do
best.

And so I will let it go with this:

F*** you too, Bent-ass!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Quoted message said:

Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something intelligent and
civil you will most likely get that back. Say something stupid and rude,
and you will most assuredly get that back.

Ed,

This is simply not true. I have tried many times to have a civil
conversation with you only to have you reply to me with rudeness and
insults. I've even had conversations with you where I implored you to remain
civil but you persisted in being rude.

It seems you don't know how to disagree without being disagreeable.

I wouldn't call you stupid because you are clearly quite intelligent but you
do seem to feel that civility is unnecessary or at least optional.

You and I (and others) could have some quite interesting conversations if
you would actually be willing to be civil and engage the topic being
discussed.

You remind me of Wayne's replacement, explanation to follow.

Back in the days of BBS's there was a BBS with an active philosophy
discussion run by someone named Wayne who was pretty high up in the Hare
Krishna organization. He was always willing to engage any topic and when it
came down to a matter of belief he would simply say, "This is what I
believe". A broad spectrum of opinion was tolerated and encouraged.

When Wayne was promoted (or whatever happens to people in that
organization), his replacement was not so interested in a lively discussion.
Just as discussions were getting going he would post a message that said
"The Veda's say xxxxx" and then he would terminate the discussion and not
allow any more posting. Needless to say that board became very unpopular
very quickly.

You remind me of this person. You do not seem to be secure enough in your
beliefs to engage with those who differ. All you do is repeat your opinion
and remind us that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.

Then later on, you lie about what you have done with postings like the one I
have quoted above.

You are simply getting back what you put out, Ed. Have you noticed that
other than yourself, nobody has bothered to insult me? Being the whacked
out, far left, liberal that I am I sure there are lots of people who
disagree, but I'm not disagreeable.

Please feel free to be yourself but don't try to claim to be someone you are
not. You do not behave civilly. It isn't anywhere near important to you to
treat people with respect and dignity. I'm sure you've even said so
yourself. If you had the slightest interest in being civil I wouldn't be
writing this message.

Happy Trails Ed,

Jeff

Edward Dolan said:

...
But what does Fab have to say for himself. We surely do not want him back
here baiting all the Freds about how fast he is and how slow they are. That
very quickly got tiresome in the extreme. Fab was a one note Johnny who was
only able to amuse idiots. Even Mr. Sherman got tired of him.

Nonsense. I find Fabby the Ultimate Poseur to be entertaining.

--
Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain

"Jeff Grippe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Edward Dolan said:

Quoted message said:

Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something intelligent and
civil you will most likely get that back. Say something stupid and rude,
and you will most assuredly get that back.

Ed,

At least you are now properly bottom posting but you still need always to
attribute who is saying what. I have supplied the missing "Edward Dolan
wrote: " I do this because I have some respect for the reader.

Quoted message said:

This is simply not true. I have tried many times to have a civil
conversation with you only to have you reply to me with rudeness and
insults. I've even had conversations with you where I implored you to
remain civil but you persisted in being rude.

If you or anyone else says anything too stupid for words, then of course I
will provide the words in excelsis. Yes, be civil and intelligent, but when
you cease to be intelligent, then you will reap the whirlwind. I simply will
not suffer idiots anymore. I am too old to play games with kids who have
only half-ass notions of things.

Quoted message said:

It seems you don't know how to disagree without being disagreeable.

There are parameters which are in place. When you exceed those parameters,
then you will get what you have coming to you. Mr. Sherman learned this the
hard way and I am here to teach all other miscreants the same hard lesson as
needs be.

Quoted message said:

I wouldn't call you stupid because you are clearly quite intelligent but
you do seem to feel that civility is unnecessary or at least optional.

Civility is a horror when certain bounds are exceeded. There is simply no
question of my intelligence. It is really quite laughable that you would
even bring the subject up.

Quoted message said:

You and I (and others) could have some quite interesting conversations if
you would actually be willing to be civil and engage the topic being
discussed.

Very many opinions are simply unacceptable. I will of course dictate which
are and which aren't.

Quoted message said:

You remind me of Wayne's replacement, explanation to follow.

Back in the days of BBS's there was a BBS with an active philosophy
discussion run by someone named Wayne who was pretty high up in the Hare
Krishna organization. He was always willing to engage any topic and when
it came down to a matter of belief he would simply say, "This is what I
believe". A broad spectrum of opinion was tolerated and encouraged.

When Wayne was promoted (or whatever happens to people in that
organization), his replacement was not so interested in a lively
discussion. Just as discussions were getting going he would post a message
that said "The Veda's say xxxxx" and then he would terminate the
discussion and not allow any more posting. Needless to say that board
became very unpopular very quickly.

You remind me of this person. You do not seem to be secure enough in your
beliefs to engage with those who differ. All you do is repeat your opinion
and remind us that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.

Yes, that is my karma and I am doomed to be eternally at its beck and call.
I know what I know and anyone who disagrees with me is ipso facto an idiot.
This is all crystal clear to me.

Where the hell did you ever get the idea that everything under the sun needs
to be heard? Mr. Sherman has expressed from time to time some ideas which
are beyond the pale. I will not engage anyone in conversation when they go
off the rails like he does. Instead, I will weigh in with anger and
invective. At least it will let the idiot in question know that not everyone
agrees with him.

Quoted message said:

Then later on, you lie about what you have done with postings like the one
I have quoted above.

Nope, I never lie about anything. I am the ultimate truth teller in the
entire universe. Of course, what is true in one context may or may not be
true in another context. Context is everything you know.

Quoted message said:

You are simply getting back what you put out, Ed. Have you noticed that
other than yourself, nobody has bothered to insult me? Being the whacked
out, far left, liberal that I am I sure there are lots of people who
disagree, but I'm not disagreeable.

Jeff, no one will bother with you except me because you are impossibly dull
and unimaginative. You are a plodder. Too many like you here on ARBR and the
group would die from boredom.

Quoted message said:

Please feel free to be yourself but don't try to claim to be someone you
are not. You do not behave civilly. It isn't anywhere near important to
you to treat people with respect and dignity. I'm sure you've even said so
yourself. If you had the slightest interest in being civil I wouldn't be
writing this message.

Most folks deserve to have their asses kicked if truth be told. I am doing
the Lord's work by at least kicking a few of those asses right here on ARBR.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Edward Dolan said:

...
But what does Fab have to say for himself. We surely do not want him back
here baiting all the Freds about how fast he is and how slow they are.
That
very quickly got tiresome in the extreme. Fab was a one note Johnny who
was
only able to amuse idiots. Even Mr. Sherman got tired of him.

Nonsense. I find Fabby the Ultimate Poseur to be entertaining.

No one as intelligent as Mr. Sherman could possibly find Fab entertaining.
After all, Fab is an idiot. I suspect Mr. Sherman has other agendas here
which he does not want the group to know about.

By the way, Fab is an infant in the game of poseur compared to me.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Are you saying that if you are a "fan" of George Bush then you are not
welcome here at ARBR. For the record, I am NOT a fan (for different
reasons than Michael Moore and Gerry Clooney) but if I were, would that
keep me from being welcome to participate in this newsgroup?

Jim Reilly
Reading, PA

stratrider said:

Are you saying that if you are a "fan" of George Bush then you are not
welcome here at ARBR. For the record, I am NOT a fan (for different
reasons than Michael Moore and Gerry Clooney) but if I were, would that
keep me from being welcome to participate in this newsgroup?

Jim Reilly
Reading, PA

Jim please, give Earl (lowbike) a fighting chance and ask your question in multiple choice.
You should be able to participate here regardless of your political viewpoints, but I've heard it's not good to top post. Proper editing can't hurt either. Whatever you do, try not to use the word "pennis".

In groups.google.com, I click on the "Reply" link to add a posting.
Clearly, the result of this action produces a "top post". By "top
post" I am guessing you mean that the original posting is not copied
before the response. As for my failure to apply "proper editing", it's
good to know the edit police are there to catch my shortcomings in this
area. Finally, I am glad that we agree that ARBR contributors need not
pass a politcal litmus test before they post their opinions.

Jim

stratrider said:

In groups.google.com, I click on the "Reply" link to add a posting.
Clearly, the result of this action produces a "top post". By "top
post" I am guessing you mean that the original posting is not copied
before the response. As for my failure to apply "proper editing", it's
good to know the edit police are there to catch my shortcomings in this
area. Finally, I am glad that we agree that ARBR contributors need not
pass a politcal litmus test before they post their opinions.

Jim

Jim,

(If you don't really care, feel free to disregard!)

In Google Groups, if you click the <show options> link, then choose the
<Reply> link which then appears, the text of the post to which you are
replying will be automatically included in the composition window.

Hope this helps,

Dan

"Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Jeff Grippe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Edward Dolan said:

Quoted message said:

Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something intelligent and
civil you will most likely get that back. Say something stupid and rude,
and you will most assuredly get that back.

Ed,

At least you are now properly bottom posting but you still need always to
attribute who is saying what. I have supplied the missing "Edward Dolan
wrote: " I do this because I have some respect for the reader.

Well I'm glad you feel respected. This was done to honor you request to be
responded to in this manor and to avoid the topic of how to post.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

This is simply not true. I have tried many times to have a civil
conversation with you only to have you reply to me with rudeness and
insults. I've even had conversations with you where I implored you to
remain civil but you persisted in being rude.

If you or anyone else says anything too stupid for words, then of course I
will provide the words in excelsis. Yes, be civil and intelligent, but
when you cease to be intelligent, then you will reap the whirlwind. I
simply will not suffer idiots anymore. I am too old to play games with
kids who have only half-ass notions of things.

You seem to have your point of view confused with "The Truth". I am not
going to try to tell you what "The Truth" is. The only thing I can say with
any certainty is that it isn't my point of view and it isn't yours. I'm not
your age but I'm a lot closer to it then I am to being a young man.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It seems you don't know how to disagree without being disagreeable.

There are parameters which are in place. When you exceed those parameters,
then you will get what you have coming to you. Mr. Sherman learned this
the hard way and I am here to teach all other miscreants the same hard
lesson as needs be.

What parameters? You mean to tell me that there were some parameters that I
exceeded that caused you to insult me in this very posting?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you are impossibly dull and unimaginative. You are a plodder.

I think I was direct and respectful while disagreeing with your opinion.
What parameter did I exceed or is the above not considered an insult where
you come from?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You and I (and others) could have some quite interesting conversations if
you would actually be willing to be civil and engage the topic being
discussed.

Very many opinions are simply unacceptable. I will of course dictate which
are and which aren't.

Quoted message said:

You remind me of Wayne's replacement, explanation to follow.

Back in the days of BBS's there was a BBS with an active philosophy
discussion run by someone named Wayne who was pretty high up in the Hare
Krishna organization. He was always willing to engage any topic and when
it came down to a matter of belief he would simply say, "This is what I
believe". A broad spectrum of opinion was tolerated and encouraged.

When Wayne was promoted (or whatever happens to people in that
organization), his replacement was not so interested in a lively
discussion. Just as discussions were getting going he would post a
message that said "The Veda's say xxxxx" and then he would terminate the
discussion and not allow any more posting. Needless to say that board
became very unpopular very quickly.

You remind me of this person. You do not seem to be secure enough in your
beliefs to engage with those who differ. All you do is repeat your
opinion and remind us that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.

Yes, that is my karma and I am doomed to be eternally at its beck and
call. I know what I know and anyone who disagrees with me is ipso facto an
idiot. This is all crystal clear to me.

Where the hell did you ever get the idea that everything under the sun
needs to be heard? Mr. Sherman has expressed from time to time some ideas
which are beyond the pale. I will not engage anyone in conversation when
they go off the rails like he does. Instead, I will weigh in with anger
and invective. At least it will let the idiot in question know that not
everyone agrees with him.

I don't think anyone assumes that everyone agrees with him or her. You anger
is counterproductive to any real dialog. If you aren't interested in real
dialog then don't bother responding at all. Anger without content is not
needed. Those of us that read what you post have a pretty good idea who you
are and how you feel. Now do you want to talk or not? If not then please be
silent.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Then later on, you lie about what you have done with postings like the
one I have quoted above.

Nope, I never lie about anything. I am the ultimate truth teller in the
entire universe. Of course, what is true in one context may or may not be
true in another context. Context is everything you know.

You can't possibly know the truth, Ed. You can only ever know Ed Dolan's
point of view. Context is indeed everything.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You are simply getting back what you put out, Ed. Have you noticed that
other than yourself, nobody has bothered to insult me? Being the whacked
out, far left, liberal that I am I sure there are lots of people who
disagree, but I'm not disagreeable.

Jeff, no one will bother with you except me because you are impossibly
dull and unimaginative. You are a plodder. Too many like you here on ARBR
and the group would die from boredom.

I guess I violated parameters here. I transgressed the unwritten law
perhaps?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Please feel free to be yourself but don't try to claim to be someone you
are not. You do not behave civilly. It isn't anywhere near important to
you to treat people with respect and dignity. I'm sure you've even said
so yourself. If you had the slightest interest in being civil I wouldn't
be writing this message.

Most folks deserve to have their asses kicked if truth be told. I am doing
the Lord's work by at least kicking a few of those asses right here on
ARBR.

Exactly which Lord's work are you doing? What bible tells you to behave this
way?

Jeff

Dan B. said:

Jim,

(If you don't really care, feel free to disregard!)

In Google Groups, if you click the <show options> link, then choose the
<Reply> link which then appears, the text of the post to which you are
replying will be automatically included in the composition window.

Hope this helps,

Dan

Dan, someone once said you can't teach an old dog new tricks. They
were wrong! Thanks for the tip.

Jim

Jeff Grippe said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something
> intelligent and civil you will most likely get that back. Say
> something stupid and rude, and you will most assuredly get that
> back.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

At least you are now properly bottom posting but you still need
always to attribute who is saying what. I have supplied the
missing "Edward Dolan wrote: " I do this because I have some
respect for the reader.

I disagree. The only important attribution is the most recent author.
His comments are the ones to whom the response is written and who said
what prior to that is irrelevant... just as this response is formatted.

Jobst Brandt

jobst brandt said:

Jeff Grippe said:

Quoted message said:

>> Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something
>> intelligent and civil you will most likely get that back. Say
>> something stupid and rude, and you will most assuredly get that
>> back.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

At least you are now properly bottom posting but you still need
always to attribute who is saying what. I have supplied the
missing "Edward Dolan wrote: " I do this because I have some
respect for the reader.

I disagree. The only important attribution is the most recent author.
His comments are the ones to whom the response is written and who said
what prior to that is irrelevant... just as this response is formatted.

Neither of the paragraphs you quoted were written by Jeff Grippe, to whom you
are responding, as you may see by the number of '>' characters.

--
Benjamin Lewis

stratrider said:

As for my failure to apply "proper editing", it's
good to know the edit police are there to catch my shortcomings in this
area.

Jim

My job here is not to be the edit police. If I were the authority in this matter I would issue a warrant for poor editing in the first degree to the poet of ARBR and have him taken into custody. Doesn't fair play require that the complete text that is being replied to be included?
Better not count on me being able to catch all your shortcomings here as I plan on spending more time on my bikes as the weather improves.

"Jeff Grippe write:

Quoted message said:

Neither of the paragraphs you quoted were written by Jeff Grippe, to
whom you are responding, as you may see by the number of '>'
characters.

You're right. I responded to the wrong message, not as I had
intended. However, I meant what I wrote. The confusion arose because
Ed responded to his own comments causing a bit of recursion. It
should have read as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Edward Dolan said:

Quoted message said:

Everything is always [censored] for tat with me. Say something
intelligent and civil you will most likely get that back. Say
something stupid and rude, and you will most assuredly get that
back.

Quoted message said:

At least you are now properly bottom posting but you still need
always to attribute who is saying what. I have supplied the
missing "Edward Dolan wrote: " I do this because I have some
respect for the reader.

I disagree. The only important attribution is the most recent author.
His comments are the ones to whom the response is written and who said
what prior to that is irrelevant... just as this response is formatted.

Jobst Brandt