General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Easiest Munro

Started by Margaret Pattis · · Last activity · 70 posts · 2,544 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 January 2004
Last activity
21 January 2004
Original author
Margaret Pattis
Posts
70
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,544
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–70 of 70
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In message <[email hidden]>, Fran <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    You clearly haven't picked up on my feelings about cairns - yet.


    *All* cairns, or just the more recent aberrations?

    They are all aberrations to me. I doubt whether more than a handful date back to real antiquity.

    --
    Martin Richardson
    216/284 Munros (34/34 'Furths'😉
    217/89 Donalds 397/1552 Marilyns 439/439 Nuttalls

  2. Graham Seed wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I think somebody from urc super glued it on top a long long time ago, just to [censored] all the walkers
    off. I thought *tops* were lower than the ......er, top? Not that I care, I've done about 20
    Munros and 6 of those were Bruach na Frithe! Hardly Munroist plus tops material.


    Tops are *now* lower han main sunnits after a century or so of revisions of Sir Shuggie's original
    tables. However in the 1891 set there were several glaring examples of 'preferred' summits which
    were not the obvious highest points. The In Pinn did not get a mention in the original tables but
    must have been known to have been higher then the Trig Point. It was marked on the 1890 map by
    Charles Pilkington (see 'The Munroist's Companion', by Robin N Campbell, p219).

    The anomolies which spring to mind are (details again from TMC), there are some others:

    1891 - Beinn Dheiceach (M), 3074 ft; Meall Glas (T), 3139 ft. Now - Beinn Cheathaich (T), 937 m;
    Meall Glas (M), 959 m.

    1891 - Meall Chuirn (M), 3007 ft; Sgiath Chuil (T), 3050 ft. Now - Meall a'Churain (T), 918 m;
    Sgiath Chuil (M), 921 m.

    and best of all, 1891 - Meall a'Chaoruinn (M), 3004 ft; Fuar Bheinn (T), 3064 ft; Glas Meall Mor
    (M), 3037 ft. Now - Meall a'Chaoruinn (x), 916 m; A'Bhuidheanach Bheag (M), 936 m; Glas Mheall Mor
    (T), 928 m.

    At first sight the changes of names/spelling confuse the issue but the positional data
    matches them up.

    OT - all these Munros are "Easy Munros".

    Graham

  3. Stewart Robert Hinsley said:

    If it was just a cairn,[the In Pinn] the Munro would be Sgurr Dearg, so you wouldn't have to worry
    about the In Pinn (just the rest of the Black Cuilin, An Teallach, Liathach, etc).

    You don't have to worry about Liathach as there is a bypass path. Similarly, you can get the two
    Munros at either end of the Aonach Eagach without traversing it.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  4. Cracking example of the groups thread drift....

    Asks for the easiest munro and we get on to a chat about the Inn Pinn!

    Richard Webb

  5. "Phil Cook" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:07:26 +0000, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:

    You don't have to worry about Liathach as there is a bypass path.


    Similarly, you

    Quoted message said:

    can get the two Munros at either end of the Aonach Eagach without


    traversing it.

    Quoted message said:

    --

    That would be a shame.

    Theo

  6. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I have never had the slightest worry about the In Pinn, it isn't on my it-inpin-nerary.


    Oh gawd, Gawdon. *Groan*.
    --
    Fran If you need my email address please ask.

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    You clearly haven't picked up on my feelings about cairns - yet.


    *All* cairns, or just the more recent aberrations?
    --
    Fran If you need my email address please ask.

  8. "Martin Richardson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Is that why you didn't join us for the Skye urw expedition.

    I'm hoping to do it again in May.

    In Dogs name, why man? You FOOL.

    Ian.

    ps. Can I come?

    --
    Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - mailgate.orgmailgate.org

  9. "Richard Webb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Cracking example of the groups thread drift....

    Asks for the easiest munro and we get on to a chat about the Inn


    Pinn!

    Quoted message said:


    Ha ha! See what great value for money we are?! BTW, Margaret, if you're still reading this the Red
    Cuillin are easy(ish) to get up. No Munros, but good viewpoints.

    Graham

  10. [email hidden] (Richard Webb) wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Cracking example of the groups thread drift....

    Asks for the easiest munro and we get on to a chat about the Inn Pinn!

    Richard Webb

    Thus proving that opposites attract?

    --
    Adrian

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.