Dyason's have just sent me Polaris shorts after I ordered 6 Panel Ozzo Shorts (without asking me first). Be warned if replacing your Ozzos, Polaris are larger - come up much higher on the waist at least. The "large" size really is for fff..., er, the fuller-figured cyclist!
Great! I will have to buy some! Not much cycle clothing made for us fatties. Jo
Quoted message said:
Quite!!
Quoted message said:
Ron Hill is the worst - for that make an XL is a size 16.
Quoted message said:
Cheers, helen s
That is not the only brand for which that is true; I am XL in almost all the the cycling tights & shorts I have bought. Those who have met me aren't likely to describe me as XL...
Ron Hill is the worst - for that make an XL is a size 16.
The worst are Italian made trousers, IMO. If they fit around the waist then the legs almost certain to be a few feet too long. This theory of mine applied before I started my re-porkifying excercises a few months ago.
In article <[email hidden]>, wafflycathcsdirtycatlitter <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Great! I will have to buy some! Not much cycle clothing made for us fatties. Jo
Quite!!
Ron Hill is the worst - for that make an XL is a size 16.
Cheers, helen s
Why oh why is all cycling kit made for undernourished midgets. I get this urge to buy out the shop every time I find something to fit. Even the CTC, who were making XL shorts a couple of years ago which I could get into have stopped them (leastways the last time I looked). Add to that my big 'ands and big 'ed.... <sigh>.
(return address munged in a forlorn attempt to get my spam mail below 50% of total) -- Peter Grange