"Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:The USCF guy is present and conducting the race. I'm not sure that means it's officially
sanctioned. It's a weekly series intended mainly for training, with new rider outreach a
secondary goal.The USCF rule about covering shoulders is stupid. But it's not the only stupid "uniform" rule I've
encountered in athletics of all kinds. The alleged justification I was told was that a fall on the
hot asphalt could cause burns. The obligatory retort is why aren't we required to wear
full-coverage leathers?I did talk to the dude in charge before the race, which is where he probably espied my hairy toes.
He mentioned that he pays out tons of money for liability insurance. I assume he either knows his
policy doesn't cover sandals, or he doesn't want to take the liability risk. Doesn't matter, he's
Gawd of the race.
You really have to be kidding. Is this Andrew or Palachick attempting the ultimate troll? The shoes
are a safety issue and since the USCF carries racing insurance for you; it's likely somewhat a legal
issue with their insurance carrier. The sleeveless jersey issue is somewhat for protection but also
(I believe) etiquette. It used to be that you couldn't wear anything but black shorts in a USCF
race. Someone told me that was so you could 'pee' on the bike without it showing...never bought
that. It's a little like wearing a collared shirt on the golf course or white on the tennis courts.
A sleevelss jersey doesn't fit the bill. It's not stupid and as someone else said, if you think you
look good in a sleeveless jersey maybe your mirro is broken. I believe the sanctioning body is
trying to make a good impression on the public and make it more pleasant to watch and attract
younger riders. I guaran-damn-tee you that I wouldn't want to be a part of a bunch of dorky cyclists
riding around in sleevelss jerseys and sandals. You have to be kidding...aren't you?
Danny Callen