UK and Europe · Public discussion

Drumochter Cycle Route

Started by Pete-the -Bike · · Last activity · 12 posts · 585 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 July 2007
Last activity
12 August 2007
Original author
Pete-the -Bike
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
585
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Drumochter Cycle Route

    Earlier this year I caught the train from Pitlochry and cycled home
    via Drumochter. I was appalled at the poor condition of the cycle
    route and it was clear to me that since the route was built about
    seven years ago no maintenance of any sort had taken place. As some of
    you may know I was a Volunteer ranger for the route but resigned in
    2002 out a frustration and the lack of co-operation of the authorities
    involved. I had thought after my ride earlier this year that a might
    try again to get something done about the route in order to save it
    from complete dereliction.

    Then Badeguish Outdoor Centre proposed holding a mass participation
    cycling event that was to use the Drumochter Route and somehow I got
    involved. My idea was that that holding this even could be a catalyst/
    lever to get things done. The route has recently been ridden again and
    a report produced detailing the problems and possible solutions. This
    report can be seen on our website by going to http://www.highlandhostel.co.uk
    and clicking the sidebar marked 'Drumochter Cycle Route. The report
    can also be downloaded from there as a PDF document.

    I will be attending a meeting in early August with Alan Jones from
    Badeguish together with authorities involved and the hope is that at
    last something can be done to maintain and repair the route.

  2. Thanks for the report (and longer one on the web site). Unfortunately
    it means I'm even less inclined to ride that than I was before :-(

    Folk do need continual kicking that there is more to "cycle routes" than
    putting something (anything!) in place and then announcing it, and
    assuming it will be okay and stay that way.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Pete-the -Bike said:

    Drumochter Cycle Route

    Quoted message said:


    I will be attending a meeting in early August with Alan Jones from
    Badeguish together with authorities involved and the hope is that at
    last something can be done to maintain and repair the route.

    This is another example of how lip service gets paid to ecouraging
    cycling but when it comes to spending mony forget it. Your description
    matches exactly my memory of this cycle path from my E2E some 5 years
    ago.

    As you point out if this path deteriorates to the point where it is
    unusable it is likely to result in a cyclist or cyclists being kiled
    by having to use the adjacent A9. As a 70mph dual carriageway with
    traffic speeds often at 80 or 90 mph I would not cycle on that part of
    the A9. This means no safe route north fo a cyclist between Glen Shee
    and the Great Glen if this path becomes unusable.

    Interestingly all the mini catle grids were block when I rode the
    route as well although I did unblock the ones which were merel blocked
    by having a gate tied closed

    Is there an chance the new Scottish Government might take a different
    attitude to this sort of issue? After all surely a vital link like
    this which is also a safety issue due to the nature of the road
    alternative must get some kind of priority.

    I'll be interested to hear how your meeting goes.

    Iain

  4. On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:41:15 -0700 someone who may be iarocu
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Is there an chance the new Scottish Government might take a different
    attitude to this sort of issue?

    I doubt it. The SNP are really only interested in motorists, despite
    claims to the contrary.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  5. in message <[email hidden]>, David Hansen

    (') said:

    On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:41:15 -0700 someone who may be iarocu
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Is there an chance the new Scottish Government might take a different
    attitude to this sort of issue?

    I doubt it. The SNP are really only interested in motorists, despite
    claims to the contrary.

    What makes you say that?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    A message from our sponsor: This site is now in free fall

  6. On 26 Jul, 04:12, David Hansen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I doubt it. The SNP are really only interested in motorists, despite
    claims to the contrary.

    Can you point to any evidence of that. Despite much of the disgraceful
    biased stories in the media before 3rd May the sky has not yet fallen
    in now that we have an SNP government in Scotland. I'm prepared to
    give them the benifit of the doubt meantime and judge them by their
    deeds.

    I'm not hugely imressed by anything the last Labour governments in
    Edinburgh have done for cycling these last few years.

    Iain

  7. Pete-the -Bike said:

    Drumochter Cycle Route

    Earlier this year I caught the train from Pitlochry and cycled home
    via Drumochter. I was appalled at the poor condition of the cycle
    route and it was clear to me that since the route was built about
    seven years ago no maintenance of any sort had taken place. As some of
    you may know I was a Volunteer ranger for the route but resigned in
    2002 out a frustration and the lack of co-operation of the authorities
    involved. I had thought after my ride earlier this year that a might
    try again to get something done about the route in order to save it
    from complete dereliction.

    Then Badeguish Outdoor Centre proposed holding a mass participation
    cycling event that was to use the Drumochter Route and somehow I got
    involved. My idea was that that holding this even could be a catalyst/
    lever to get things done. The route has recently been ridden again and
    a report produced detailing the problems and possible solutions. This
    report can be seen on our website by going tohttp://www.highlandhostel.co.uk
    and clicking the sidebar marked 'Drumochter Cycle Route. The report
    can also be downloaded from there as a PDF document.

    I will be attending a meeting in early August with Alan Jones from
    Badeguish together with authorities involved and the hope is that at
    last something can be done to maintain and repair the route.

    Sorry but I don't agree that the A9 is a dangerous road to cycle.
    Traffic volumes are light and there is not much dual carriageway.

    I have never seen a bike on the adjacent cycle path when driving up
    and down the A9. If I were to cycle the route I would in any case be
    happy to use the road.

  8. "raisethe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry but I don't agree that the A9 is a dangerous road to cycle.
    Traffic volumes are light and there is not much dual carriageway.

    I have never seen a bike on the adjacent cycle path when driving up
    and down the A9. If I were to cycle the route I would in any case be
    happy to use the road.

    I ride every day on a trunk road, but I wouldn't choose to ride on the A9.
    IME it's either busy or has very fast traffic on it (or both...) - it's a
    well engineered road, which means driving quickly on it is easy.

    cheers,
    clive

  9. Clive George said:

    "raisethe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry but I don't agree that the A9 is a dangerous road to cycle.
    Traffic volumes are light and there is not much dual carriageway.

    I have never seen a bike on the adjacent cycle path when driving up
    and down the A9. If I were to cycle the route I would in any case be
    happy to use the road.

    I ride every day on a trunk road, but I wouldn't choose to ride on the
    A9. IME it's either busy or has very fast traffic on it (or both...) -
    it's a well engineered road, which means driving quickly on it is easy.

    I ride daily on a trunkish road (A4174), I am beginning to
    feel safer on that road, than on some of the smaller roads
    I also ride on. Having cagers drive head on at you on
    smaller roads is not very nice.

  10. raisethe said:

    Sorry but I don't agree that the A9 is a dangerous road to cycle.

    Well opinions can differ.

    Quoted message said:

    Traffic volumes are light and there is not much dual carriageway.

    The point is that most of the uphill section approaching Drumochter
    summit from the south is fast dual carriageway. Traffic speeds uphill
    here are 80 mph or faster for cars and light goods vehicles. I've
    never seen a cycle on the road here. Drivers do not expext to see
    them. Mixing 10 mph cycles with 80 mph traffic is not sensible. That's
    why cycles are not allowed on motorways. Cycling on the hard shoulder
    of a motorway would in fact be far safer than cycling on this dual
    carriageaway section of the A9

    Quoted message said:

    I have never seen a bike on the adjacent cycle path when driving up
    and down the A9.

    Maybe there would be more if the path was improved.

    If I were to cycle the route I would in any case be

    Quoted message said:

    happy to use the road.

    Your call but that doesn't make it safe.

    Iain

  11. Attended a meeting yesterday with various people who may (or may
    not) get something done. Most important was a man from Transerve (The
    Trunk Roads Authority) who not only admitted that the Drumochter Cycle
    Track was their responsibility but that there was a budget for fixing
    it, We shall see, my cynical self thinks there is a big gap between
    promises of action and the action that may or may not follow. I will
    keep you all posted if anything happens. I simply do not buy this line
    from Transerve that they, 'suddenly noticed' a clause in the contact
    that requires them to look after the cycle route. More like the
    prodding from others and myself has helped them 'suddenly notice' this
    clause. Our local MSP Fergus Ewing has also asked to be kept informed,
    he has always been very helpful in the past.

    pete-the-bike

  12. "Pete-the -Bike" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Attended a meeting yesterday with various people who may (or may
    not) get something done. Most important was a man from Transerve (The
    Trunk Roads Authority) who not only admitted that the Drumochter Cycle
    Track was their responsibility but that there was a budget for fixing
    it, We shall see, my cynical self thinks there is a big gap between
    promises of action and the action that may or may not follow. I will
    keep you all posted if anything happens. I simply do not buy this line
    from Transerve that they, 'suddenly noticed' a clause in the contact
    that requires them to look after the cycle route. More like the
    prodding from others and myself has helped them 'suddenly notice' this
    clause. Our local MSP Fergus Ewing has also asked to be kept informed,
    he has always been very helpful in the past.

    Suspect I've missed a few posts, its a dire section isn't it.

    Niall

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.