against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the
book publisher
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Drug Allegations
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 16 June 2004
- Last activity
- 17 June 2004
- Original author
- Trapper
- Posts
- 11
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 643
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisherWhat makes you think Giants fans give a damn about some
idiot bicycle racer?here!
-
Since he won 5 in a row, many believe he uses, like most
everyone else. But knowing that, he will have to stay clean,
because they have new sensitive testing chemestry, that
means he will loose this time. The Book publisher has sworn
statements and photographs and will publish anyway. Well,
who will replace LA anyway?"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisher -
".SHERIFF ¤ OF ¤ HONK ¤ HONK." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisherWhat makes you think Giants fans give a damn about some
idiot bicycle
racer?on
Quoted message said:
here!
*Think* and *Giants fans* next to each other in the same
sentence. Be more careful with your verb placement.Phil Holman
-
Quoted message said:
What makes you think Giants fans give a damn about
some idiot
bicycle racer?on
Quoted message said:
here!
Giants? What has T-Mobile to do with this? It should
be Trekkies.".SHERIFF ¤ OF ¤ HONK ¤ HONK." <[email hidden]>
wrote in message news:j5KdnfOroOQaC1LdRVn-
[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisherWhat makes you think Giants fans give a damn about
some idiot
bicycle racer?on
Quoted message said:
here!
-
Zzzzzzzzzz! Curt
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisher -
"L G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Well, who will replace LA anyway?That super clean Iban Mayo.
-
"curt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Zzzzzzzzzz! Curt
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisherWas that you falling asleep watching baseball??
-
L G said:
Since he won 5 in a row, many believe he uses, like most
everyone else. But knowing that, he will have to stay
clean, because they have new sensitive testing chemestry,
that means he will loose this time. The Book publisher has
sworn statements and photographs and will publish anyway.
Well, who will replace LA anyway?Art Bell (and others) can produce sworn statements
that certainthat Lincoln rose from the grave and assassinated John
Kennedy from the grassy knoll, etc. - so tell me what good
are sworn statements. Without physical evidence, sworn
statements are meaningless. The evidence against is not that
LA has never tested positive, but that samples of his that
were tested a year later using more sensitive test were
negative, that numerous investigations by the French
(looking at physical evidence, etc.) have not discovered any
wrong doing, and that any number of cyclist that have been
caught that never tested positive have been caught with less
scrutiny such as Rumas, Virenque, etc. Does this prove LA
has not juiced, no, but it does provide substantial evidence
that he has not. When sworn statements can either lead to or
corroborate physical evidence of drug use, they they have
merit, when they simply fill out a book, then they their to
sell books. Until such time I will focus on the discussion
about those who claim to have invented time machines or the
guy who recently argued that reptoids inhabit the inner
earth - and more importantly are responsible for most of the
UFO sightings (you can get pictures and sworn statements
from him also).Walsh himself admits he proves nothing. So if the info was
as strong as he (and others claim) then he could actually
prove something. All Walsh has done is find a way to line
his pockets with some gold for the time being.Quoted message said:
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisher -
"Tom Arsenault" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"curt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Zzzzzzzzzz! Curt
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the
book publisherWas that you falling asleep watching baseball??
Couldn't have been falling asleep watching a bicycle race
eh? -
Everyone knows the path to not being detected last year,
Frogs were not testing the right way for it, (it was posted
in this newsgroup as well). But it is a new year, they have
changed how they test, so LA will be off the juice and lose,
retire. LAs former Dr. is being investigated for
distribution of performance drugs to other athletes (today
on the tele)."Rick Hopkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
L G said:
Since he won 5 in a row, many believe he uses, like most
everyone else.
ButQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
knowing that, he will have to stay clean, because they
have new
sensitiveQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
testing chemestry, that means he will loose this time.
The Book publisher has sworn statements and photographs
and will publish anyway. Well, who will replace LA
anyway?Art Bell (and others) can produce sworn statements
that certainQuoted message said:
that Lincoln rose from the grave and assassinated John
Kennedy from the grassy knoll, etc. - so tell me what good
are sworn statements. Without physical evidence, sworn
statements are meaningless. The evidence against is not
that LA has never tested positive, but that samples of his
that were tested a year later using more sensitive test
were negative, that numerous investigations by the French
(looking at physical evidence, etc.) have not discovered
any wrong doing, and that any number of cyclist that have
been caught that never tested positive have been caught
with less scrutiny such as Rumas, Virenque, etc. Does this
prove LA has not juiced, no, but it does provide
substantial evidence that he has not. When sworn
statements can either lead to or corroborate physical
evidence of drug use, they they have merit, when they
simply fill out a book, then they their to sell books.
Until such time I will focus on the discussion about those
who claim to have invented time machines or the guy who
recently argued that reptoids inhabit the inner earth -
and more importantly are responsible for most of the UFO
sightings (you can get pictures and sworn statements from
him also).Walsh himself admits he proves nothing. So if the info was
as strong as he (and others claim) then he could actually
prove something. All Walsh has done is find a way to line
his pockets with some gold for the time being.Quoted message said:
"Trapper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:EYLzc.59828$Sw.49844@attbi_s51...Quoted message said:
against Lance Armstrong, and he is going to sue the book
publisher
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.