General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Dreamfields Pasta

Started by Kerry · · Last activity · 36 posts · 866 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 February 2005
Last activity
7 February 2005
Original author
Kerry
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
866
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

  2. I eat it couple times a week now and it seems to be OK.
    Jerry

    "Kerry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

  3. It's great stuff! I've been using it once or twice a week since July/04
    and it hasn't caused any problems for me. There have been posts here from
    some people with type 2 diabetes having problems, and posts from others who
    had no problems, but I'm not diabetic.

    Kerry said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    -----
    Bev

  4. Pasta is not low carb.

    --
    You take stupid to a new level. -- MFW

    "Kerry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

  5. I can't tell the difference at all between 'real' pasta and Dreamfields. You
    will love it.

  6. x-no-archive: yes

    Kerry said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

    It's fine for some folks, and as bad or even worse than regular pasta
    for others. Diabetics like me, who use our meters to test its effects
    on blood glucose often find that there's a delayed rise in blood
    glucose, and that the spike lasts longer than it would with regular pasta.

    Some folks have no such problem. YMMV. It has as many carbs as regular
    pasta; some folks digest all of them, some don't, so yes, it's too good
    to be completely true, but a nice treat for those who can tolerate it.

    The company warns that overcooking (I cook it only about 6 or 7 minutes
    at most) negates the benefits. Some folks have found that lefovers of
    it or that used in salads, etc. raise BG just like regular pasat, too.

    Susan

  7. x-no-archive: yes

    Kerry said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

    It varies. Google it up and you'll find a lot of reports of delayed,
    long lasting blood glucose spikes.

    Susan

  8. "Kerry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    It raised my blood sugar as high as the regular stuff does and it stayed up
    longer, it just waited 3 hours before it started going up. It may depend
    on a person's individual chemistry or whatever.

    --
    No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

  9. "Kerry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    Kerry 🙂

    I had it one time pre-LC but never felt full so I figured it was a bad sign.
    It did taste great but I'm to scared to eat it at this point.

    I would be willing to use it if I HAD to have pasta... It has to be better
    then a full cheat right?

    All you can do is give it a try and see how your body responds. Like I said
    as far as taste goes I thought it was good.

    Angie

  10. "It raised my blood sugar as high as the regular stuff does and it
    stayed up
    longer, it just waited 3 hours before it started going up. It may
    depend
    on a person's individual chemistry or whatever. "

    Were you careful not to over cook it? As I understand it, if cooked
    too long, the miracle binding agent that's supposed to prevent the
    carbs from being digested comes undone.

  11. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "It raised my blood sugar as high as the regular stuff does and it
    stayed up
    longer, it just waited 3 hours before it started going up. It may
    depend
    on a person's individual chemistry or whatever. "

    Were you careful not to over cook it? As I understand it, if cooked
    too long, the miracle binding agent that's supposed to prevent the
    carbs from being digested comes undone.

    Wouldn't it have gone up immediately if I cooked it too long. I didn't,
    btw.

    --
    No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

  12. x-no-archive: yes

    Quoted message said:

    Were you careful not to over cook it? As I understand it, if cooked
    too long, the miracle binding agent that's supposed to prevent the
    carbs from being digested comes undone.

    I undercook it, and it does the same thing to me, and others, anecdotally.

    Susan

  13. And yet...

    I eat it a few times a week.

    Had a 1/2 c pre cooked last night.

    My BGs were 124 at 2 hours and 97 by bed time 3 hours after that.

    So, the usual YMMV.

    Jennifer

    None Given said:

    "Kerry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aloha from Hawaii,

    Has anyone tried this pasta? It is so good and says it only has 5
    grams of digestible carbs. I am just really suprised because it tastes
    100 times better than any other low carb pasta I have tasted. This will
    make low carb eating a lot easier. Is it too good to be true? Please
    respond.

    It raised my blood sugar as high as the regular stuff does and it stayed up
    longer, it just waited 3 hours before it started going up. It may depend
    on a person's individual chemistry or whatever.

  14. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "It raised my blood sugar as high as the regular stuff does and it
    stayed up
    longer, it just waited 3 hours before it started going up. It may
    depend
    on a person's individual chemistry or whatever. "

    Were you careful not to over cook it? As I understand it, if cooked
    too long, the miracle binding agent that's supposed to prevent the
    carbs from being digested comes undone.

    I have a theory that whatever they do to it works for about half the
    diabetic population, who are the only people with easy feedback on immediate
    results. I have no idea if that translates to non-diabetics. I suspect it's
    the same kind of figure as for people who can cope with sugar alcohols,
    which I understand is due to the presence or absence of an enzyme to digest
    them fully. The populations aren't the same, from my sample population of
    one - I can eat Dreamfields quite happily, but get dire results from the
    ols! : )

    Nicky.

    --
    A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/78/72Kg
    1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine
    T2 DX 05/2004

  15. I emailed the company to specifically ask about this supposed problem with
    overcooking. They replied that no one at Dreamfields said that and that
    overcooking will not do anything to make the pasta higher in carbs.

    Susan said:

    The company warns that overcooking (I cook it only about 6 or 7 minutes
    at most) negates the benefits. Some folks have found that lefovers of
    it or that used in salads, etc. raise BG just like regular pasat, too.

    -----
    Bev

  16. Your theory makes sense to me. I also have no problems with Dreamfields
    but get terrible gas from even small amounts of all SA's except erythritol.
    So you can add me to your 'sample population'. :-)

    on Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:48:30 -0000, "Nicky" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I have a theory that whatever they do to it works for about half the
    diabetic population, who are the only people with easy feedback on immediate
    results. I have no idea if that translates to non-diabetics. I suspect it's
    the same kind of figure as for people who can cope with sugar alcohols,
    which I understand is due to the presence or absence of an enzyme to digest
    them fully. The populations aren't the same, from my sample population of
    one - I can eat Dreamfields quite happily, but get dire results from the
    ols! : )

    -----
    Bev

  17. x-no-archive: yes

    Bev-Ann said:

    I emailed the company to specifically ask about this supposed problem with
    overcooking. They replied that no one at Dreamfields said that and that
    overcooking will not do anything to make the pasta higher in carbs.

    I have a copy of their email to me with headers. They sure did say that
    the *results were dependent upon cooking time*, see their reply to me
    about their *clinical validation*. In another correspondence, I told
    them that many diabetics found a late and long BG rise, and they denied
    any knowledge of that. I doubt they'd be eager to test anyone's BG
    after the two hour mark, for obvious reasons. I never said cooking it
    too long *increased* the carbs, the number remains the same, it's the
    digestibility that changes.

    Here's what they sent me, with headers; the emphases are mine:

    Return-Path: <[email hidden]>
    Received: from rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (rly-yh03.mail.aol.com
    [172.18.180.67]) by air-yh01.mail.aol.com (v99_r4.3) with ESMTP id
    MAILINYH12-2b740a3873a3d9; Thu, 13 May 2004 10:33:42 -0400
    Received: from web107.biz.mail.yahoo.com (web107.biz.mail.yahoo.com
    [216.136.174.209]) by rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (v98.5) with ESMTP id
    MAILRELAYINYH35-2b740a3873a3d9; Thu, 13 May 2004 10:33:31 -0400
    Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    Received: from [12.40.187.3] by web107.biz.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu,
    13 May 2004 07:33:30 PDT
    Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
    From: info <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Dreamfields
    To: [email hidden]
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    X-AOL-IP: 216.136.174.209
    X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:[censored]:XX
    X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0

    Hi Susan and thanks for your interest in Dreamfields
    products. Cooking time is important with any pasta to
    achieve the best taste and texture, cooking longer
    than shown on the package is not recommended.

    ****Our
    clinical validation applies to the preparation methods
    indicated on the package.***

    ***When the product is
    prepared as shown on the package, the
    non-digestibility does not change over time.***

    I hope
    this answers your questions and again, thanks for
    inquiring about Dreamfields.

    End quote.

    Susan

  18. Unfortunately, I didn't keep the reply I got from them but they
    specifically said that it did not change the amount of digestible carbs.
    Since getting their reply, I ALWAYS overcook their pasta because even their
    suggested upper limit of 12 minutes is not enough for me. And I also
    generally make enough to have leftovers that I can eat a few days later. I
    have been doing this once or twice a week since July. Their pastas have
    never presented any problems for me.
    I can only report on my own experiences with their products which are
    obviously different from yours. :-)

    Susan said:

    I have a copy of their email to me with headers. They sure did say that
    the *results were dependent upon cooking time*, see their reply to me

    -----
    Bev

  19. I found the email reply I received from them and it only said that
    overcooking didn't affect the carbs, not the digestible carbs. I've sent
    them another email asking them to clarify this. I'll post the reply when I
    receive it.

    Bev-Ann said:

    Unfortunately, I didn't keep the reply I got from them but they
    specifically said that it did not change the amount of digestible carbs.

    -----
    Bev

  20. x-no-archive: yes

    Bev-Ann said:

    Unfortunately, I didn't keep the reply I got from them but they
    specifically said that it did not change the amount of digestible carbs.
    Since getting their reply,

    I guess the folks at Dreamfields aren't to be relied upon for accurate
    information, or for honesty? I kept that email for a reason.

    I ALWAYS overcook their pasta because even their

    Quoted message said:

    suggested upper limit of 12 minutes is not enough for me.

    I find this astounding; it's mushy as all heck at 9 minutes. Bleah.
    Boiled for 5 and then baked with cheese, it was completely flaccid.

    And I also

    Quoted message said:

    generally make enough to have leftovers that I can eat a few days later. I
    have been doing this once or twice a week since July. Their pastas have
    never presented any problems for me.
    I can only report on my own experiences with their products which are
    obviously different from yours. :-)

    As long as relying on your experiences doesn't extend to implying that
    Im a liar, I'm delighted for you.

    If you read my posts in this thread, you would have seen that I stated
    that some folks do just fine eating it, and others have worse results.
    Unless you're testing your blood glucose, you have no way of knowing
    exactly where you fall in the spectrum. If it isn't interfering with
    your diet, that's great, but diabetics have more to worry about, and the
    company is furnishing unfortunate assurances about the effect of their
    pasta on us.

    I have nothing against the product, just with their exaggerated claims
    and unreliabilty of their "clinical" claims. From your post, we now
    know that they lie to comsumers outright and don't keep track of what
    they've lied about.

    Susan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.