To provide for their re use as rail lines should circumstances permit.
IF the line is already a successful cycle facility then this gives an excuse to grab it back.
If ever anyone starts investing that kind of money in rail travel then I think we'd all be happier.
certinaly having more lines to spread the load wouldn't be a bad idea at all, certinaly in the areas that trains either don't have the reach or are overloaded.
Quoted message said:
If it encourages rail buffs to support the retention and protection then great?
true though depending on age/area maybe well be a bit fanciful. ie to repair may well cost more than making a new line.
Please support the new petition on the Downing Street web site to protect old rail lines from developers.
In the rail White paper the Govt declined to put a national protection on them , leaving it to local councils.
I might be wrong, but I'm sure I've heard people quoting some 'national policy' which states that old railway trackbeds shouldn't be built on, it might have been over in uk.railway.
I got the impression the policy is primarily in case the railway link ever needs to be reinstated in the future but using it as a cycle route would be a good interim use and you may be able to run the cycle route and rail line along the same corridor in the future.
The other good thing about some old railway lines is that they used to run between places so provide a useful, reasonably direct route between places. (The Tonge-Derby route springs to mind)
naked_draughtsman said the following on 23/01/2008 22:41:
Quoted message said:
I might be wrong, but I'm sure I've heard people quoting some 'national policy' which states that old railway trackbeds shouldn't be built on, it might have been over in uk.railway.
I also thought that, but if it is policy then it's ignored. For instance, one of the obstacles preventing the old Weston, Clevedon & Portishead Railway from being turned into a cyclepath and so providing the only direct link[1] between the three towns is that it has partly been built on.
I also thought that, but if it is policy then it's ignored. For instance, one of the obstacles preventing the old Weston, Clevedon & Portishead Railway from being turned into a cyclepath and so providing the only direct link[1] between the three towns is that it has partly been built on.
But if the line closed in 1970 and this policy wasn't dreamed up until 1990 you can't blame planners as much if the building was built in 1980....
Local authorities may well be ignoring any national policy (if it does exist) - they may not be aware of it!
There was some fuss made when Wrexham county council marked part of an old trackbed for development in their local development plan - the locals wanted it used as a footpath. The council even has a cycling policy which says (along with lots of other things which the council and developers have completely ignored!) that old railway lines should be preserved for cycle routes but even though there's so many which are mostly intact we still don't have any such cycle lanes around here.