"Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Tue, 10 May 2005 08:59:18 +0100, BigBen <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:richard said:15-20% grades. The 34x23 does fine.
You were able to get a 23 teeth chainring'?? I though the smallest you
could get was a 39 teeht?
Regards,
BigBen.
I think he means a 23t rear cog, part of the cassette. The chainring
would be the 34t listed.
Life is Good!
Jeff
Just thought I share my experiences with you going from a double to a triple
this year.
I love climbing hills, and I've been riding double chainrings up until now.
I have done the Markleeville Death Ride, and Mt. Hamilton Challenges in the
past along with other hills around my area with a 53/39 and 12-27 cassette
and before that 52/42 with a 12-24. Usually I have to get out of the saddle
and stand on the steep climbs, which isn't a problem unless the climbs are
long.
I'm also hooked to a Polar heart rate monitor so I could not only chart my
HR, but my times, speed and cadence.
What inspired me to change to the triple was watching Lance Armstrong's
technique on the mountain stages in the Tour de France. Although he rides
with a double chainring, he has a very fast cadence in the mountains,
unlike his rivals like Jan Ullrich who would rather grid up the
hills...nothing wrong with that, just different styles. I also saw the
interview with Lance's trainer Chris Carmichael and his reason for
Armstrong's higher cadence.
So I thought I give it a try, of course not with a double, but with a triple
crank 52/42/30. I did have to also change the front and rear derailleur. I
always did like the 52/42 combination on the flats, but preferred the 53/39
in the hills. With the triple I mostly ride with the top and middle
chainring and use the 30t in the hills. I had to get used to the higher
cadence, felt like I was learning all over again, but it didn't take long to
learn the technique and charting my HR, time, speed and cadence, I've found
I'm riding more efficiently. Since I've been riding the same training rides
every week for the past 10 years, I'm able to do a good comparison. My
training times are about the same, speed is also about the same, but my HR
is lower and I also found I'm not as spent or tired after a good climb with
the higher cadence. I also can stay seated longer which really puts my HR in
check. As far as weight of the bike is concerned, I can feel the difference
when I pick up the bike (mental), but when I'm riding, there seems to be no
difference, at least I can't feel it. A few of my friends tease me about
riding with a triple crank, some call it a granny gear, but I really don't
care what they say, I'm enjoying my climbs even more now.
fwiw,
-Tom