Well, thirty years old isn't necessarily out of date. Many writings much
older than that are international best sellers. The test is in the value.
A friend of mine introduced me to that book a few weeks ago. It's still
being read, and still points to out-of-the-box-thinking, especially in this
post modern age that rejects science as absolute truth and acknowledges
alternative paths to truth as viable. After all, "The reasonable man adapts
himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the
world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable
man." -- George Bernard Shaw
But that has nothing to do with Brian.
JF
--
All men dream, but not equally.
Those who dream by night in the dusty
recesses of their minds
Awake to find that it was vanity;
But the dreamers of day are dangerous men,
That they may act their dreams with open eyes to make it possible.
-- T. E. Lawrence
http://spaces.msn.com/members/flomblog/
"Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:j05Ve.225313$9A2.16486@edtnps89...
Quoted message said:"Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote ...
Quoted message said:>
Why would someone interested in the truth ride rough shod
over the scientific method?
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/feyerabe.htm
Except that BL will select the science that supports his rant.
The article is 30 years out of date and a buncha [censored]. Typical
philosophical whining; we live in a golden age and all PF can do is
complain about all the yellow.
If the test doesn't work, find a better test.
Phil H
