General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Don't Panic ... But ...

Started by Sam D. · · Last activity · 6 posts · 476 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Sam D.
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
476
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. United Press International 6/30/2004 7:26 PM

    Up to 100 More Mad Cow Cases Expected By Steve Mitchell

    WASHINGTON, June 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of
    Agriculture reported Wednesday a cow that initially tested
    positive for mad cow disease has come back negative on follow-
    up testing, but a food industry consultant told United Press
    International he estimates there could be more than 100
    cases of the deadly disorder in the country's herds.

    About half of the cases will go undetected and passed on for
    human consumption, Robert LaBudde, president of Least Cost
    Formulation Ltd., a food industry consultancy in Virginia
    Beach, Va., told UPI.

    The USDA is still awaiting results from another case that
    initially tested positive Tuesday. Results could take four
    to seven days. Under the agency's expanded surveillance
    plan, which went into effect June 1, cows initially are
    screened by so-called rapid tests and any positives are
    followed up with confirmatory testing. The only confirmed
    U.S. case of mad cow disease to date occurred in Washington
    state last December.

    The concern is humans can contract a fatal, incurable brain
    illness known as variant Creutzfeldt Jakob disease from
    eating meat infected with the mad cow pathogen. The USDA
    said any cows that initially test positive are withheld
    from the food supply pending additional testing, so U.S.
    beef is safe.

    "No matter how the confirmatory test comes back, USDA
    remains confident in the safety of the U.S. beef supply,"
    USDA's chief veterinary officer John Clifford told reporters
    Wednesday.

    LaBudde, who has served on the faculties of the
    University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Massachusetts
    Institute of Technology, thinks there will be many more
    infected cows detected.

    "There is no question that we will be seeing a dozen or more
    -- possibly 100 or more -- cases of BSE-positive cattle in
    our national herd," said LaBudde, whose clients include the
    meat industry.

    Mad cow disease is also known by the technical name bovine
    spongiform encephalopathy or BSE.

    LaBudde said he bases his prediction on the one positive
    case detected so far, compared to the number of downers, or
    at-risk animals, in U.S. herds -- which amounts to about
    250,000 by his calculations. That would yield about 68 cases
    among the at-risk cows, he wrote in a recent article
    published in Food Safety magazine. In Europe, the number of
    cases among seemingly healthy animals has been about half
    that seen in the at-risk cows. So in the U.S. that would
    yield 34 additional cases, for a total of 102.

    Only about half the cases will be detected, however,
    because many animals will not show any symptoms, LaBudde
    said. This is based on the experience in Europe, where half
    the animals that test positive have no outward symptoms of
    infection, he added.

    The USDA's surveillance plan focuses predominantly on
    animals with obvious signs of the disease, such as
    staggering, the inability to stand or dying from it.
    Only a small percentage of healthy-appearing animals
    will be tested.

    LaBudde said the department should test all cows over age 5
    regardless of their health status, because these are the
    most likely to have passed through the lengthy incubation
    period of the disease and test positive. He called the
    USDA's failure to do that bordering on "negligent."

    The USDA and the meat industry have insisted the U.S.
    beef supply is safe because the most infectious parts of
    the cows -- the brain, spinal cord and intestines -- are
    being removed.

    LaBudde agrees with that assessment, estimating there would
    be, at most, only one case of vCJD in the United States.

    "But that doesn't mean that the policy is not malfeasance
    and morally wrong," he said. "It's much like a car company
    taking the 'insurable risk' and letting the gas tanks
    explode under certain types of rear-end collisions."

    Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman and other USDA officials
    have said they expect to find additional mad cow cases, but
    agency spokeswoman Julie Quick said the agency does not have
    an official estimate of the total number of cases they
    eventually expect to detect.

    "That is one of the reasons we put this enhanced
    surveillance plan in place," Quick told UPI.

    David Ray, spokesman for the American Meat Institute, a
    trade group in Arlington, Va., told UPI his organization
    also does not have an estimate of the number of infected
    cows that might be lurking in U.S. herds.

    "We've never even tried to make an estimate," Ray said.

    The number of cases is irrelevant to food safety, he said,
    because the agency's testing program is designed to help
    determine the prevalence of the disease, not ensure the
    safety of the meat supply. The safety of the food is
    ensured by the removal of the most infectious parts of the
    animal, he said.

    Spinal columns are often split open during processing,
    however, and some experts have expressed concern this
    creates the potential for the infectious agent to
    contaminate the meat.
    --
    Steve Mitchell is UPI's Medical Correspondent. E-mail [email hidden]

    upi.comview.cfm

  2. _.-In rec.food.cooking, Sam D. wrote the following -._

    Quoted message said:

    The USDA and the meat industry have insisted the U.S. beef
    supply is safe because the most infectious parts of the
    cows -- the brain, spinal cord and intestines -- are being
    removed.

    And that is the part that never makes it on the TV news. If
    more people knew that you could eat a steak from a mad cow
    and not worry because the meat has no tracess of the
    problem. Thus.. I don't panic. And I say this as someone who
    has read The Jungle.

    --
    .-'😉) asciipr0n.comfp ('-. | It's a damn poor mind
    that ' ..- .:" ) ( ":. -.. ' | can only think of one way
    to ((,,_;'.;' UIN=66618055 ';. ';_,,)) | spell a word.
    ((_.YIM=Faux_Pseudo :._)) | - Andrew Jackson

  3. Faux_Pseudo said:

    _.-In rec.food.cooking, Sam D. wrote the following -._

    Quoted message said:

    The USDA and the meat industry have insisted the U.S.
    beef supply is safe because the most infectious parts of
    the cows -- the brain, spinal cord and intestines -- are
    being removed.

    And that is the part that never makes it on the TV news. If
    more people knew that you could eat a steak from a mad cow
    and not worry because the meat has no tracess of the
    problem. Thus.. I don't panic. And I say this as someone
    who has read The

    They cut the spinal cord down the center with a saw that
    splashes pieces of spinal cord tissue all over the rest of
    the cow. Also, a T-bone or bone-in strip steak is part of
    the spinal cord, plus there's nerves from the spinal cord
    running all throughout the cow. You're apparently not as
    well read as you think you are.

    Over 30% of the meat in the latest USDA survey of
    mechanically separated meat included spinal cord tissue.

    -sw (doing my part to bring down beef prices)

  4. In article <8PXEc.17$pY2.15@lakeread01>,

    Faux_Pseudo said:

    _.-In rec.food.cooking, Sam D. wrote the following -._

    Quoted message said:

    The USDA and the meat industry have insisted the U.S.
    beef supply is safe because the most infectious parts of
    the cows -- the brain, spinal cord and intestines -- are
    being removed.

    And that is the part that never makes it on the TV news.
    If more people knew that you could eat a steak from a mad
    cow and not worry because the meat has no tracess of the
    problem. Thus.. I don't panic. And I say this as someone
    who has read The Jungle.

    <shiver> I've read that book too..... Almost put me off
    commercial sausage forever!

    K.

    --
    Sprout the Mung Bean to reply...

    Quoted message said:

    ,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<Katraatcenturyteldotnet>,,<

    cgi6.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dll
    &include=0&userid=katra

  5. One dark day on Usenet said:

    In article <8PXEc.17$pY2.15@lakeread01>, Faux_Pseudo <Faux_Pseudo@ip68-230-192-
    17.rd.hr.cox.net> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    _.-In rec.food.cooking, Sam D. wrote the following -._

    Quoted message said:

    The USDA and the meat industry have insisted the U.S.
    beef supply is safe because the most infectious parts
    of the cows -- the brain, spinal cord
    and intestines -- are being removed.

    And that is the part that never makes it on the TV news.
    If more people knew that you could eat a steak from a
    mad cow and not worry because the meat has no tracess of
    the problem. Thus.. I don't panic. And I say this as
    someone who has read The Jungle.

    <shiver> I've read that book too..... Almost put me off
    commercial sausage forever!

    I wonder how many folks leading veggie lifestyles did so
    after reading "The Jungle". ;-)

    j.j. - who liked the book, but avoided processed meats for
    a while...

  6. _.-In rec.food.cooking, Steve Wertz wrote the following -._

    Quoted message said:

    They cut the spinal cord down the center with a saw that
    splashes pieces of spinal cord tissue all over the rest of
    the cow.

    Which is normally sprayed down to remove it because people
    don't like bitting into bits of spinal cord pepering their
    stake. Not completely effective but enough for me.

    Quoted message said:

    Also, a T-bone or bone-in strip steak is part of the
    spinal cord,

    Those aren't cuts I normally eat. Can't afford them.

    Quoted message said:

    plus there's nerves from the spinal cord running all
    throughout the cow.

    I haven't seen any evidance that BSE is in those
    nevers though.

    Quoted message said:

    You're apparently not as well read as you think you are.

    Better than most. Not as good as some.

    Quoted message said:

    Over 30% of the meat in the latest USDA survey of
    mechanically separated meat included spinal cord tissue.

    Mecanically sperated meat isn't something I eat too often
    unless it is pig meat. I eat lots of pork sausage but seldom
    touch any processed meat of the cow kind.

    Now if dogs and cats started dropping from mad cow I would
    be worried because they tend to get all of the parts of the
    cow that "didn't enter the human food chain". When they
    start stumbling around then I will chang my diet.

    --
    .-'😉) asciipr0n.comfp ('-. | It's a damn poor mind
    that ' ..- .:" ) ( ":. -.. ' | can only think of one way
    to ((,,_;'.;' UIN=66618055 ';. ';_,,)) | spell a word.
    ((_.YIM=Faux_Pseudo :._)) | - Andrew Jackson

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.