Road Cycling · Public discussion

does ten speeds obsolete 9?

Started by g.daniels · · Last activity · 11 posts · 317 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 July 2004
Last activity
14 July 2004
Original author
g.daniels
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
317
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

  2. g.daniels said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    Sometimes you make me so curious as to what you are saying 😉

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    9 speed is better because that one cog less makes the bike weigh less.
    -------------
    Alex

  4. g.daniels said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    I've got 10, 9 and an old 6 :-] for most riding it's the gears, not the
    numbers. 12-25 for hilly stuff, 11-21 for flats. I'm not old nor fat
    enough to need 27, yet. Higher number of gears allows fine ratio
    selection, thus minimizing the shock. Not terribly important in my book
    unless riding conditions are going to be highly variable (i.e. hilly or
    going in and out of head/cross winds.)

  5. [email hidden] (g.daniels) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    is g.daniels really channelling James Joyce when he writes?

  6. [email hidden] (g.daniels) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    is g.daniels really channelling James Joyce when he writes?

  7. Richard Adams <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    g.daniels said:

    and in what conditions?
    how much time is lost? on a given course?
    does everyone change at once
    or are there two more classes?

    I've got 10, 9 and an old 6 :-] for most riding it's the gears, not the
    numbers. 12-25 for hilly stuff, 11-21 for flats. I'm not old nor fat
    enough to need 27, yet. Higher number of gears allows fine ratio
    selection, thus minimizing the shock. Not terribly important in my book
    unless riding conditions are going to be highly variable (i.e. hilly or
    going in and out of head/cross winds.)

    I am old & fat. well sort of. Anyway It's nice to have the 27 here in
    North Ga. I rarely if ever use it but it's handy if you blow-up. My
    set-up is 8 speeds plus the 27. I must say 9 is not obsolete.

  8. thus the podium and top ten criterium riders are
    a mix of 9's and 10's?

  9. g.daniels said:

    thus the podium and top ten criterium riders are
    a mix of 9's and 10's?

    Dang. I almost understood you there. But I can't figure out what the
    difference between the podium and top ten riders are? You don't mean those
    scandal beauties they stick on every podium do you? No they only have sex
    gears.
    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  10. Richard Adams said:


    I'm not old nor fat
    enough to need 27, yet.

    Go up Alba Road.

  11. gecwhite said:
    Richard Adams said:


    I'm not old nor fat
    enough to need 27, yet.

    Go up Alba Road.

    That's mean, Greg. Going up Alba Road doesn't make you fatter.

    It might make you a little lighter if your puke threshold is low, though.
    It definitely makes you older.

    Ben
    30x23 for Alba, 30x26 helps in the rain

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.