Road Cycling · Public discussion

dizzy when riding

Started by Dwayne · · Last activity · 48 posts · 1,616 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 July 2004
Last activity
12 July 2004
Original author
Dwayne
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,616
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–48 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    You cannot safely assume that everyone reading your posts has access
    to any prior posts in the thread, much less has read and remembered
    all of them. Attributing, relevant quoting for context and
    bottom-posting are all part of Usenet etiquette for sound reasons.

    I may assume that most people are using a proper news reader or know how
    to use Google? A capsulated catch up...

    OP gets dizzy towards the end of ride

    Someone decides to practice medicine via newsgroup perhaps w/ out a
    license? I have a problem with this for obvious reasons. I sure hope
    this is not SOP.

    I suggest OP see a doctor.

    Someone takes offense that I suggest OP see a doctor.

    I question the tone of that post and the validity of some statements
    that were made as they may or may not apply to the human race.

    Someone questions my source on a point I made about a hypertension.
    symptom.

    I recite personal experience and apologise for an inference that wasn't
    meant.

    You jump in.

    So here we are still talking about an off post subject, but at least
    everyone now is updated.

    Please let me apologise again for not including and updating all readers
    on a minor off topic post that was meant for a few individuals (who may
    not have used a valid email address - which is a usenet violation and
    makes it impossible to have a private email discussion) and not for the
    whole group.

    Can we let this thread die now or at least bring it back to OP?

  2. "Denver C. Fox" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Obviously not to you or you would have been following the thread?

    You cannot safely assume that everyone reading your posts has access
    to any prior posts in the thread, much less has read and remembered
    all of them. Attributing, relevant quoting for context and
    bottom-posting are all part of Usenet etiquette for sound reasons.

    Thanks. This guy seems to think he is the only person on USENET and
    we all follow his posts single-mindedly!

    You have it completely wrong. I think there's so many people on Usenet the
    only way we can make it work optimally is to adhere to its well established
    standards and guidelines.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  3. "Ben A Gozar" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    "DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    You cannot safely assume that everyone reading your posts has access
    to any prior posts in the thread, much less has read and remembered
    all of them. Attributing, relevant quoting for context and
    bottom-posting are all part of Usenet etiquette for sound reasons.

    I may assume that most people are using a proper news reader or know
    how to use Google? A capsulated catch up...

    OP gets dizzy towards the end of ride

    Someone decides to practice medicine via newsgroup perhaps w/ out a
    license? I have a problem with this for obvious reasons. I sure hope
    this is not SOP.

    I suggest OP see a doctor.

    Someone takes offense that I suggest OP see a doctor.

    I question the tone of that post and the validity of some statements
    that were made as they may or may not apply to the human race.

    Someone questions my source on a point I made about a hypertension.
    symptom.

    I recite personal experience and apologise for an inference that
    wasn't meant.

    You jump in.

    Welcome to Usenet.

    Quoted message said:

    So here we are still talking about an off post subject, but at least
    everyone now is updated.

    Please let me apologise again for not including and updating all
    readers on a minor off topic post that was meant for a few
    individuals (who may not have used a valid email address - which is a

    Usenet forums are for everybody. There's no such thing as a private
    discussion on Usenet.

    Quoted message said:

    usenet violation and makes it impossible to have a private email
    discussion) and not for the whole group.

    Quoted message said:

    Can we let this thread die now or at least bring it back to OP?

    Sure, now that the rest of us can follow what's going on.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  4. On 11 Jul 2004 15:38:15 GMT, Ben A Gozar <[email hidden]> wrote:

    (who may not have used a valid email address - which is a usenet
    violation and makes it impossible to have a private email discussion)

    Many people do not appreciate an unsolicited email. With the problem
    of spam and virii and trojans, unknown email is typically deleted
    unread, anyway, at least by me.

    -B

  5. Badger_South said:

    BTW, looks like you need to hire me on as a bodyguard. I got some skillz in
    that area, plus the unnecessary upper body mass intimidation thing goin'
    on, heh-heh.
    http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/ouch.jpg

    egads i must remember to purge the old photos. here's a better one from my
    frustrated, overstressed grad school days about 6 years later (& 8 years ago).

    http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/reudi2.jpg

    ;-)

    actually, that also sums up how i feel about my grad school experience.

    Quoted message said:

    I'll get a new set with my Trek and all the biking gear when I'm on
    vacation. The upper body has trimmed down a little but the quads and calves
    are hyoouge. I think my calves are like 18.5" cold, but need a little more
    defo.

    not, uhh, really into measuring body parts but i'm pretty sure i don't have
    18" calves (but i got killer definition). on the plus i do have larger
    biceps than tyler. ;-) for me & my riding it ain't the legs that give out,
    it's the cardio.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, nice bike http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/seven.jpg You rule!

    that's my baby. she eats road bikes for breakfast, lunch & dinner.
    --
    david reuteler
    [email hidden]

  6. David Reuteler said:
    Badger_South said:

    BTW, looks like you need to hire me on as a bodyguard. I got some skillz in
    that area, plus the unnecessary upper body mass intimidation thing goin'
    on, heh-heh.
    http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/ouch.jpg

    egads i must remember to purge the old photos. here's a better one from my
    frustrated, overstressed grad school days about 6 years later (& 8 years ago).

    I forgot the story. Did ya get socked? That's a great photo with your
    friends all mugging btw.

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/reudi2.jpg

    ;-)

    Ah, digitally going through the prime numbers.

    Quoted message said:

    actually, that also sums up how i feel about my grad school experience.

    Quoted message said:

    I'll get a new set with my Trek and all the biking gear when I'm on
    vacation. The upper body has trimmed down a little but the quads and calves
    are hyoouge. I think my calves are like 18.5" cold, but need a little more
    defo.

    not, uhh, really into measuring body parts but i'm pretty sure i don't have
    18" calves (but i got killer definition). on the plus i do have larger
    biceps than tyler. ;-) for me & my riding it ain't the legs that give out,
    it's the cardio.

    Taping biceps measurements and calves is a hold over from the weight
    training/bodybuilder days. For me, depending on terrain, legs and
    cardio both improving. My 25 and 33 y.o. self from the past would
    still kick my current 53y.o. asses ass, but I'm gaining on 'em. ;-D

    Back then I just rode - no real concept in my 20s of 'training'. We
    just rode. (I was 150lb then, too.)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    BTW, nice bike http://www.visi.com/~reuteler/images/seven.jpg You rule!

    that's my baby. she eats road bikes for breakfast, lunch & dinner.

    I bet. So where you riding these days?

    -B

  7. "Badger_South" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    On 11 Jul 2004 15:38:15 GMT, Ben A Gozar <[email hidden]> wrote:

    (who may not have used a valid email address - which is a usenet
    violation and makes it impossible to have a private email discussion)

    Many people do not appreciate an unsolicited email. With the problem
    of spam and virii and trojans, unknown email is typically deleted
    unread, anyway, at least by me.

    Yes, using an unmunged email address on Usenet is just asking for trouble.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  8. Dwayne,

    Well this is excellent news! It sounds like things are going better. Of
    course, the temperature being a bit lower certainly helps. If all of
    this worked, then I think you should continue to follow the formula. I
    doubt that the potassium made any difference. Likely keeping hydrated
    did make a difference. Also, the fact that you had to go to the bathroom
    a lot is good too. It means that your body is well-hydrated.
    Perhaps your first dizzying ride was a little more intense than what
    you were used to. If you weren't used to riding this hard, the body can
    sometimes go into a sort of shock when it's put under heavy physical
    activity.
    Keep us updated.

    - Muskie

    Dwayne said:

    Badger_South <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ben A Gozar said:

    Below is the way I meant my note to be read. It was an estimation of
    course, but we men aren't exactly known to be running to the doctor at the
    rate of women. The sad news is once we pass forty things go wrong and we
    men tend to die off rather suddenly. Two of my friends went in for a check
    up only for the doctors to have bp readings on both of them of almost
    165/[censored]. They both went in for reasons not associated with hypertension. I
    visited my doctor for completely different problems I could no longer
    ignore and I found out I am not 16 any more. In the United States at least,
    I think the Doctor may be closer to correct, than farther from it.

    At any rate I do not have an informed opinion on whether it is a true
    statement or not, I was just passing on what was told to me.

    >When I read it, I gave it a totally different interpretation than
    >either of the above: For every man that he sees in the office, he
    >estimates there are 15 others with serious health problems who are not
    >coming in, and could be at serious risk.

    And I'm saying that if you are active, have no obvious risk, such as
    smoking, overweight, alcoholic, and soforth that there's no reason to be
    this paranoid. Of course if you walk down the street you'll see lots of
    examples of couch potatoes walking out of bars, chain smoking. I'd say 90%
    of these guys are at significant risk. But without doing a physical, guess
    what? I'd be pulling that estimation out of my ass.

    Certain risk factors might be predictable based on your genetics - many
    black men have high blood pressure, and for them, over 40, go get that
    checked. Otherwise, to quote that kind of figure to any particular patient
    is a scare tactic, and meaningless. You pretty much know your risk factors,
    b/c you know how you're abusing your body. But among a sub group, such as
    bikers who have been doing it for 10 years and are lean and fit and active
    and don't overdo their vices, would that be the case? My dad is 81, active
    all his life, and has smoked a pack of unfiltered cigs a day since he was
    25, and still going strong - go figure. In my case, go look at my pic at 50
    and tell me what kind of risk factors I have.

    http://www.pbase.com/image/18847396/medium

    So, IMO, for your doc to say that is meaningless, irresponsible (for making
    you paranoid, if it did) and he could have said 9 out of 10 or 1 out of 100
    and both been right, depending on demographic.

    I'll tell you what's dangerous, though. Go into any hospital to have a
    minor procedure and your chances of never coming out again are quite high,
    due to nosocomial infection (hospital antibiotic resistant bugs), surgical
    mistakes, and other misadventures. So I could say doctors - stay the freak
    away from them, b/c you could be misdiagnosed or they could just have seen
    a patient with resistant strep and forgot to wash his hands. Did your doc
    wash his hands before he left your exam room? He didn't? OMG! ;-)

    Go check out some sites that talk about 'what they don't tell you about
    medical exams'. Do you know that the devices they use for endoscopy and
    rectal exams can not be properly sterilized? THat's right, the chances are
    good that the last patient they scoped has left a little bit of blood or
    body fluid inside the device and now it's inside you. There's no known way
    to sterilize against prion infections (mad cow), so if you have an
    operation, you might be innoculated with CJD and not know it. What if
    you're having an appendectomy and they nick an artery and you have to get
    blood? Or the anesthesiologist gives you the wrong gas (happened to my dad
    and they tried to cover it up - he actually went into cardiac arrest b/c
    they gave him 5 times the dose needed by mistake when he had a kidney stone
    removed). See, it works both ways. ;-p

    OK, sorry for the rant....

    -B

    Ok here's what happened this morning. I got up at 7:20 and showered
    and got dressed and the entire time I was drinking bottles of filtered
    water, about 3 bottles full, plus. Then I ate a peanut butter granola
    bar and a small amount of peanut butter for sustained energy. I
    checked my BP and it was 129/92. I checked my blood sugar count with
    my wife's kit and it was 102, before I ate anything (fasting). She
    told me that was a fairly good reading, diabetes would be 130 - 200+,
    while fasting all night. then I took one 99 mg potassium tablet and 3
    cal/mag/zinc = 1000 mg total, tablets. Then, I went riding for about
    2 hours and rode about 22 miles and the temp was about 77 with about
    80 % humid, the temp was normal but the humid. was a little less than
    usual here. Everything went fine. I didn't get a bit sick. I even
    pushed myself to do more and had no problems. Even when my buddies
    wanted to turn back before it got too hot, I wanted to go further but
    we turned back, probably a good idea anyway, I thought. I rode all
    the way back with no problems. then as soon as I got in the door at
    home, I check my BP and it was 116/69. My heart rate was 98 BPM. I
    felt perfectly fine and still full of energy. What gives? Was it the
    potassium? WAs it the 3 bottles full of water before I rode? Oh one
    more thing, during the ride I suddenly had to "go". My bladder was
    full. So I stopped and did my business and went on. Then when I got
    home I had to go again. That doesn't usually happen.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.