Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

DIY xmass idea 3

Started by g.daniels · · Last activity · 11 posts · 324 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 November 2004
Last activity
29 November 2004
Original author
g.daniels
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
324
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.globalspec.com/

    products and manufacturers

    why fool with mobil one when yawl can give your loved one a bottle of
    mil spec B-1 lube 5-300w!

  2. check out Simco's alkyd enamel!
    ok!, there's the centrifuge plant coming up on....

  3. g.daniels said:

    http://www.globalspec.com/

    products and manufacturers

    why fool with mobil one when yawl can give your loved one a bottle of
    mil spec B-1 lube 5-300w!

    Rumour had it that Pedro's Syn Lube was overpriced Mobil 1 in a small
    bottle.

  4. Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    Chris "South Cacalacky" Zacho

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back.
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

  5. "Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    Unless you are a pilot

  6. Frank Drackman said:


    "Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    Unless you are a pilot

    Jawohl! Oder ein kleines boot!

    M. Richtofen

  7. On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:39:31 -0500, [email hidden] (Chris Zacho "The

    Wheelman') said:

    Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    And it serves to replace the missing 2nd person plural indicative that English
    no longer has.

    Why do so few English speakers employ this usefull word?

    Ron

  8. On 11/28/2004 05:26 PM, in article [email hidden],

    Frank Drackman said:


    "Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    Unless you are a pilot

    In which case, it's simply 'yaw' ...

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [foreword] slash

  9. Ronsonic said:

    On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:39:31 -0500, [email hidden] (Chris Zacho "The

    Wheelman') said:

    Dear Mr. Daniels:

    It's spelled y'all (a contraction of "you all"😉 NOT "yawl".

    And it serves to replace the missing 2nd person plural indicative that English
    no longer has.

    Why do so few English speakers employ this usefull word?

    Ron

    Dear Ron,

    Hadst thou suffered through an Old English class or two,
    thou wouldst have learnt that thy forefathers cast the
    second person plural aside lo these many centuries ago and
    danced scornfully upon its pitiful corpse--yea, even unto
    throwing the very letters used in spelling it (the thorn and
    the asch) onto the dunghill of language, along with the
    peculiar dual articles of Old English (neither singular nor
    plural) to which pants and scissors and other things that
    naturally come in two's were once sensibly yoked.

    More technically, all languages simplify as they grow older.
    Endings and varying forms tend to regularize and simplify
    when we realize (that) we can follow each other without the
    excruciating detail. (The omission of "that" and the common
    confusion about when it should be replaced with "which" are
    a sign of simplifying--we know (that) it's not needed.)

    The irregular words that survive do so because they are what
    linguists call strong words, meaning that they are used so
    often that their increasingly peculiar forms are retained,
    even though they have become absurd. In English, regular
    present-tense verbs like "to talk" have simplified to the
    charming common form and the -s added for third person
    singular: I, you, we, and they talk (common), but he, she,
    or it talks (-s). But the strong verb "to be" is used so
    often that we native English speakers scarcely give its
    hideous congjugation any thought: am-is-are, was-were . . .
    where the hell's be"?

    ("Be" shows up in be-being-been, but the verbs in question
    are actually just a jumbled-together Frankenstein's monster
    made out of parts of three different verbs that have long
    since vanished. If the same thing were to happen in Spanish,
    bits and pieces of the verbs "estar" and "ser" would be
    tangled together haphazardly.

    To return to simplification, Spanish as used in the New
    World hardly ever uses "vosotros" (an informal or familiar
    form of "ustedes" that is practically the same as "y'all"😉,
    just as "thee" and "thou" have vanished from English outside
    of Amish crack dens and the pornography of the Pennsylvania
    Dutch.

    Similarly, the archaic European forms for formal and
    familiar addresss are showing signs of vanishing amongst the
    youthful speakers, who couldn't care less--and who grow even
    wearier of worrying about the gender of every noun in the
    universe, a murky tradition that English has thankfully
    abandoned.

    I wouldn't be surprised if some European languages allow
    their cycling newsgroups to torture themselves about which
    articles should precede a man's versus a woman's
    bicycles--should the latter step-through frame use the
    feminine version of "the" or not? Or should all bicycles be
    masculine and appear only after a properly masculine
    article? Is a woman's Italian bicycle a Campagnola?

    Carl Fogel

  10. 1. a yawl isa sailboat of some ocean going beam that hasa boom and
    then some sail hung offen the sterna with itsa mast0 well rearwarda
    ofada hull's polar moment.This arrangement, played by an accompolished
    pilote, allows manuverability and sailing close to the wind thru
    narrow channels whilst carperbagging.
    2. yawl is a combinative form of ya'll,a trog shortened form of the
    vulgar "you all" used by expletive dleted making fun of george bush:
    trog ruler of red states.
    see barnett's dictionary of entymology-itsa gas!

  11. they should cut the grass more often.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.