Your Bloody Soap Box · Public discussion

Discontent and Hate

Started by jhuskey · · Last activity · 34 posts · 3,293 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Your Bloody Soap Box
Published
5 November 2004
Last activity
11 November 2004
Original author
jhuskey
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,293
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.
    I am using someone else work below to better express my perspective.
    Comment expected.

    It was six men of Indostan
    To learning much inclined,
    Who went to see the Elephant
    (Though all of them were blind),
    That each by observation
    Might satisfy his mind

    The First approached the Elephant,
    And happening to fall
    Against his broad and sturdy side,
    At once began to bawl:
    “God bless me! but the Elephant
    Is very like a wall!”

    The Second, feeling of the tusk,
    Cried, “Ho! what have we here
    So very round and smooth and sharp?
    To me ’tis mighty clear
    This wonder of an Elephant
    Is very like a spear!”

    The Third approached the animal,
    And happening to take
    The squirming trunk within his hands,
    Thus boldly up and spake:
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a snake!”

    The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
    And felt about the knee.
    “What most this wondrous beast is like
    Is mighty plain,” quoth he;
    “ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant
    Is very like a tree!”

    The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
    Said: “E’en the blindest man
    Can tell what this resembles most;
    Deny the fact who can
    This marvel of an Elephant
    Is very like a fan!”

    The Sixth no sooner had begun
    About the beast to grope,
    Than, seizing on the swinging tail
    That fell within his scope,
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a rope!”

    And so these men of Indostan
    Disputed loud and long,
    Each in his own opinion
    Exceeding stiff and strong,
    Though each was partly in the right,
    And all were in the wrong!

    Moral:

    So oft in theologic wars,
    The disputants, I ween,
    Rail on in utter ignorance
    Of what each other mean,
    And prate about an Elephant
    Not one of them has seen!

  2. Who the hell would read all that blather?
    Stop your whining.
    If you wanna play with the bigs dogs, expect to get bit.
    If you can't take it, go back to your sewing circle forum.

    jhuskey said:

    There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.
    I am using someone else work below to better express my perspective.
    Comment expected.

    It was six men of Indostan
    To learning much inclined,
    Who went to see the Elephant
    (Though all of them were blind),
    That each by observation
    Might satisfy his mind

    The First approached the Elephant,
    And happening to fall
    Against his broad and sturdy side,
    At once began to bawl:
    “God bless me! but the Elephant
    Is very like a wall!”

    The Second, feeling of the tusk,
    Cried, “Ho! what have we here
    So very round and smooth and sharp?
    To me ’tis mighty clear
    This wonder of an Elephant
    Is very like a spear!”

    The Third approached the animal,
    And happening to take
    The squirming trunk within his hands,
    Thus boldly up and spake:
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a snake!”

    The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
    And felt about the knee.
    “What most this wondrous beast is like
    Is mighty plain,” quoth he;
    “ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant
    Is very like a tree!”

    The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
    Said: “E’en the blindest man
    Can tell what this resembles most;
    Deny the fact who can
    This marvel of an Elephant
    Is very like a fan!”

    The Sixth no sooner had begun
    About the beast to grope,
    Than, seizing on the swinging tail
    That fell within his scope,
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a rope!”

    And so these men of Indostan
    Disputed loud and long,
    Each in his own opinion
    Exceeding stiff and strong,
    Though each was partly in the right,
    And all were in the wrong!

    Moral:

    So oft in theologic wars,
    The disputants, I ween,
    Rail on in utter ignorance
    Of what each other mean,
    And prate about an Elephant
    Not one of them has seen!

  3. Your quotation is a borrowing from Greek philosophy - possibly the skeptics who believed knowledge to be impossible so that knowledge and opinion were recognised as being distinct.
    How do you know that what you see or hear is what really exists in the way you perceive it? Or do you just pick up an approximation of a shared or assumed reality?
    But I get your drift. I think these discussions are interesting but there are points where a thread will deteriorate into insults when people don't hear each other out. I've seen studio debates where folks hurl chairs at one another once dialogue fails.

    jhuskey said:

    There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.
    I am using someone else work below to better express my perspective.
    Comment expected.

    It was six men of Indostan
    To learning much inclined,
    Who went to see the Elephant
    (Though all of them were blind),
    That each by observation
    Might satisfy his mind

    The First approached the Elephant,
    And happening to fall
    Against his broad and sturdy side,
    At once began to bawl:
    “God bless me! but the Elephant
    Is very like a wall!”

    The Second, feeling of the tusk,
    Cried, “Ho! what have we here
    So very round and smooth and sharp?
    To me ’tis mighty clear
    This wonder of an Elephant
    Is very like a spear!”

    The Third approached the animal,
    And happening to take
    The squirming trunk within his hands,
    Thus boldly up and spake:
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a snake!”

    The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
    And felt about the knee.
    “What most this wondrous beast is like
    Is mighty plain,” quoth he;
    “ ‘Tis clear enough the Elephant
    Is very like a tree!”

    The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
    Said: “E’en the blindest man
    Can tell what this resembles most;
    Deny the fact who can
    This marvel of an Elephant
    Is very like a fan!”

    The Sixth no sooner had begun
    About the beast to grope,
    Than, seizing on the swinging tail
    That fell within his scope,
    “I see,” quoth he, “the Elephant
    Is very like a rope!”

    And so these men of Indostan
    Disputed loud and long,
    Each in his own opinion
    Exceeding stiff and strong,
    Though each was partly in the right,
    And all were in the wrong!

    Moral:

    So oft in theologic wars,
    The disputants, I ween,
    Rail on in utter ignorance
    Of what each other mean,
    And prate about an Elephant
    Not one of them has seen!

  4. I like it! I've heard the "blind men go to see an elephant" story, of course, but never so eloquently expressed.

    I see what you mean about people in these forums shouting out their own views and ignoring others, but I don't think everyone does that; in fact, I think the people who do that are in a minority. To return to the analogy, they do indeed say "it's like a rope"..."it's like a tree"..."it's like a snake" etc., but there's nothing to stop everyone concluding that maybe this object can have more than one property, and reaching a common consensus. After all, we can only call things like we see them. The problem with the blind guys is not that they call things as they see (well, not SEE) them, but that they refuse to acknowledge any other viewpoint. Most members of this forum are intelligent, non-bigoted people who wish to discuss and learn rather than merely assert, IMO.

  5. jhuskey said:

    There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.

    Very true Story.
    But I believe that the greatest achivement of the [censored] Sapiens is the ability to adapt to the Environment.
    When you find yourself in a Hostile Environment, you start to defend yourself, preferably using equal or better Weapons.
    In my opinion statements like 'if someone slaps you on the right cheek...' and so on, are complete Nonsense.

  6. mjw_byrne said:

    I like it! I've heard the "blind men go to see an elephant" story, of course, but never so eloquently expressed.

    I see what you mean about people in these forums shouting out their own views and ignoring others, but I don't think everyone does that; in fact, I think the people who do that are in a minority. To return to the analogy, they do indeed say "it's like a rope"..."it's like a tree"..."it's like a snake" etc., but there's nothing to stop everyone concluding that maybe this object can have more than one property, and reaching a common consensus. After all, we can only call things like we see them. The problem with the blind guys is not that they call things as they see (well, not SEE) them, but that they refuse to acknowledge any other viewpoint. Most members of this forum are intelligent, non-bigoted people who wish to discuss and learn rather than merely assert, IMO.

    No not everyone, but a few.

  7. iknowtest said:

    Who the hell would read all that blather?
    Stop your whining.
    If you wanna play with the bigs dogs, expect to get bit.
    If you can't take it, go back to your sewing circle forum.

    Trust me I have been bit as deeply as you could ever imagine and It wasn't here in this forum. Beside I am not whining just using an alternative way of expressing my opinion.
    Like pissing in someone drink only different.

  8. jhuskey said:

    There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.
    I am using someone else work below to better express my perspective.
    Comment expected.

    I disagree...Extreme is up to interpretation. I have found few instances of extreme, threatening behavior here...heated discussion, name calling? Yes...Extreme...well I think it is the exception rather than the rule...Just my humble opinion...

  9. iknowtest said:


    If you wanna play with the bigs dogs, expect to get bit.
    If you can't take it, go back to your sewing circle forum.

    So you think you're a big Dog, ey?
    I think you're just one of those tiny, always barking ones. And you know what these Dogs never do, don't you?

  10. Carrera said:

    Your quotation is a borrowing from Greek philosophy - possibly the skeptics who believed knowledge to be impossible so that knowledge and opinion were recognised as being distinct.
    How do you know that what you see or hear is what really exists in the way you perceive it? Or do you just pick up an approximation of a shared or assumed reality?
    But I get your drift. I think these discussions are interesting but there are points where a thread will deteriorate into insults when people don't hear each other out. I've seen studio debates where folks hurl chairs at one another once dialogue fails.

    If you want to get a point across use plagiarizeism. Well, it works for me.
    Yes territorialism is a marked animal characteristic. The discussion of late tend to deterioriate in the first couple of responses.Of course they are mostly Geo-Political.

  11. jhuskey said:

    There is much to be learned in forums such as this but lately I am disturbed at what I am learning. Everyone has an opinion and as of late it seems all have an extreme one.
    I am using someone else work below to better express my perspective.
    Comment expected.

    well jhuskey, I enjoyed that story and I certainly agree that there can be no discussion when everyone here continues to put forth an extreme viewpoint. Now that the election is over maybe some of us can moderate our views a little and be a little more honest.

    People here claim to want to have reasonable discussion but whenever a poster writes something intelligent or thoughtful it is completely ignored. Unfortunately a lot of posters seem to be enjoying the endless flaming, which leads me to believe that all of you seriously need to get laid to work out whatever hostility you all have.

    Everyone who responds to the insane rantings of these trolls is just as guilty for the degeneration of these threads as the trolls are. You are all responding exactly as they want you to.

    Now, speaking of trolls, I have to say that the ones frequenting the soapbox are quite pathetic are they not? I enjoy a good troll as long as they are witty or clever but szbert, iknowtest and some of the others are clearly not. They need to take lessons from babybunny, pokerpete and the RBR trolls who know how to get things done and make people laugh.

    Hey, can someone help me with my math? Which of these equations is correct?:

    1) Zapper = iknowtest

    2) Weisse Luft = szbert = velogal

    3) all of the above

    Its no coincidence that Zapper and Weisse were not posting frequently when these other losers appeared.

  12. Saucy said:


    Everyone who responds to the insane rantings of these trolls is just as guilty for the degeneration of these threads as the trolls are. You are all responding exactly as they want you to.

    Hey, can someone help me with my math? Which of these equations is correct?:

    1) Zapper = iknowtest

    2) Weisse Luft = szbert = velogal

    3) all of the above

    Its no coincidence that Zapper and Weisse were not posting frequently when
    these other losers appeared.

    I agree with you, but I don't feel that guilty, is that bad?

    For the math, I'd say 3, but 1 = 2 is also correct.

  13. [quote="Saucy"]well jhuskey, I enjoyed that story and I certainly agree that there can be no discussion when everyone here continues to put forth an extreme viewpoint. Now that the election is over maybe some of us can moderate our views a little and be a little more honest.

    People here claim to want to have reasonable discussion but whenever a poster writes something intelligent or thoughtful it is completely ignored. Unfortunately a lot of posters seem to be enjoying the endless flaming, which leads me to believe that all of you seriously need to get laid to work out whatever hostility you all have.

    Everyone who responds to the insane rantings of these trolls is just as guilty for the degeneration of these threads as the trolls are. You are all responding exactly as they want you to.


    I suppose I am as guilty as any but usually only respond when someone take a hard right or left that pushes my button.

  14. Everyone wants to act like everyone can be right in their own way. Give me a break. If man A says you should believe in God and live as the Bible says to, and man B says there is no God and lives by his own desires. One is going to be right and one is going to be wrong. Everything is not relative and subjective. Everyone just wants to be tolerant and sing Koombaiya(no clue how to spell),but I think it better to stand up and believe in something, but what matters more is if what you believe in is right. I am pretty sure the elephant guy and I dont see eye to eye.

  15. That's a good point about getting laid. I always get to thinking that some of these right-wing British women over here (who moan about sexual promiscuity and always seem to want to go to war) should just get themselves a toy-boy.

    [quote="jhuskey"]

    Saucy said:

    well jhuskey, I enjoyed that story and I certainly agree that there can be no discussion when everyone here continues to put forth an extreme viewpoint. Now that the election is over maybe some of us can moderate our views a little and be a little more honest.

    People here claim to want to have reasonable discussion but whenever a poster writes something intelligent or thoughtful it is completely ignored. Unfortunately a lot of posters seem to be enjoying the endless flaming, which leads me to believe that all of you seriously need to get laid to work out whatever hostility you all have.

    Everyone who responds to the insane rantings of these trolls is just as guilty for the degeneration of these threads as the trolls are. You are all responding exactly as they want you to.

    I suppose I am as guilty as any but usually only respond when someone take a hard right or left that pushes my button.

  16. jhuskey said:

    I suppose I am as guilty as any but usually only respond when someone take a hard right or left that pushes my button.


    Actually I think you have been one of the more restrained posters around here. You communicate your view without name-calling and personal attacks. And usually with a good joke thrown in as well.

    So, I am curious. Did you vote for Bush or are you a Republican? There has been a lot of post-election discussion in the media about the future of the Democratic party in recent days. But I think the far more interesting topic is the future of the Republican party.

    Are you happy with the direction the republican party is taking i.e. taking on the moral agenda of evangelical christians? What about Bush's fiscal policies which are clearly not conservative?

    I have to imagine that there are a lot of dissatisifed moderate republicans but they seem to be keeping quiet about it. Most of the grumbling I have heard is from fiscal conservatives but I think the social progressives of the party are going to come out of the woodwork in the next four years.

    I am just curious as to the true feelings of bush supporters now that the election is over. I'm not sure if you identify yourself as republican or perhaps you are actually part of the evangelical base yourself?

  17. recneps345 said:

    Everyone wants to act like everyone can be right in their own way. Give me a break. If man A says you should believe in God and live as the Bible says to, and man B says there is no God and lives by his own desires. One is going to be right and one is going to be wrong. Everything is not relative and subjective. Everyone just wants to be tolerant and sing Koombaiya(no clue how to spell),but I think it better to stand up and believe in something, but what matters more is if what you believe in is right. I am pretty sure the elephant guy and I dont see eye to eye.

    You can't be right about any opinion. Yes, a broad majority may think that x thing is wrong (ie murder or slavery), but that still doesn't make it factually wrong. I don't know of any scientific way to prove such a thing. I'm not saying that I think that murder is okay, only that you can prove that maybe 99.9% of people believe that murder is wrong. Moral beliefs vary from person to person.

    Philisophically, it's virtually impossible to prove anything to be true (yes, this is a tangent). For example, we, as humans, have come to believe that up is towards the sky, and down is towards the ground. We then extrapolate that since this true here, it must be true everywhere in the universe. But what about a planet in which gravity pulls to the side (yes, it is possible)? Say people live there. They might say that up is to (our) right, while down is to (our) left. Thus, they would believe those principles and say it's true for the entire universe.

    I guess I'm just providing support to jhuskey's post/the famous elephant poem. "Truth is different depending on one's perception."

    It's one thing though to stand up for what you believe in. It's another to just flame those who don't agree with you.

  18. Saucy said:

    Actually I think you have been one of the more restrained posters around here. You communicate your view without name-calling and personal attacks. And usually with a good joke thrown in as well.

    So, I am curious. Did you vote for Bush or are you a Republican? There has been a lot of post-election discussion in the media about the future of the Democratic party in recent days. But I think the far more interesting topic is the future of the Republican party.

    Are you happy with the direction the republican party is taking i.e. taking on the moral agenda of evangelical christians? What about Bush's fiscal policies which are clearly not conservative?

    I have to imagine that there are a lot of dissatisifed moderate republicans but they seem to be keeping quiet about it. Most of the grumbling I have heard is from fiscal conservatives but I think the social progressives of the party are going to come out of the woodwork in the next four years.

    I am just curious as to the true feelings of bush supporters now that the election is over. I'm not sure if you identify yourself as republican or perhaps you are actually part of the evangelical base yourself?

    I am I guess a moderate conservative up to and including but not limited to the belief that a peraon should work their A** off for what they get and no particular group should be given special consideration or priveledge.
    As far as morals I am not a Bible Thumper,so to speak, but do believe that some type of family unit is the basis of a solid society and no I am not limiting that to the "Norman Rockwell " version of the family vision.

    I do like to look at history and take from the experience of our ancestors. Why not, they have already made the mistakes.
    As far as my levity I suppose it is sometimes easier for me to communicate in that venue and besides I see humans as comical in their actions and I include myself in that analogy. We do some damn silly [censored]!
    I truly believe if the Democratic party had submitted a more modereate candidate ,he would be headed to the White House ,besides I heard he threw the election because his wife thought the White House was actually just the guest house beacuse of its small size. That's a rich [censored] joke.

  19. Hey, Stiff Upper Lip teacher from New Jersey. Why are you tring to hide your location now?

    Did you show those posts of you flirting with the chicks to your wife yet?

    Those photos of you with the [censored] [censored] are hilarious. Thankfully, I had that in my cache from before you deleted them. I'll repost them for everyone soon.

    Stiff Upper Lip said:

    J--I agree with this gentleman. I think that your style is very balanced. You sound like you have found peace and in that provide a certain calm to others. As they say in India: Namaste.

  20. Stiff Upper Lip said:

    J--I agree with this gentleman. I think that your style is very balanced. You sound like you have found peace and in that provide a certain calm to others. As they say in India: Namaste.

    I certainly appreciate the kind comments. I attribute any success I have to the wonderful people in my life.
    It is also said before enlightenment you must chop wood and carry water and after enlightenment chop wood and carry water. I personally take from this keep your expectations reasonable and don't take your self too seriously its a fight to the end and for those that don't appreciate the more esocertic rhetoric.
    Grab life by the Ba**s and take a downhill slide!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.