Dan512 said:Well as I see it there are several reasons "against" disk brakes on road bikes.
1) Road bike forks are not as stiff as MTB forks, so they can take some of the road shocks by flexing. As the brake calipers sit at the far end of the fork, the lever is more important then with rim brakes, so the fork will bend backwards on hard braking and force you to adjust the trajectory permanently.
2) There is apossible heat transfer issue between the brake calipers and the fork. Both carbon and aluminum tend to loose most of their stiffness at temps as low as 150°C, which can easily be reached on long descents.
3) The spokes on just one side of the wheel have to transmit the whole braking force onto the rim. This puts a lot of stress on the spokes and nipples.
4) And I guess there's is definitly a weight issue involved.
Most of the problems enounced could be solved if some clever mind put itself to it, but as to now I only know of the german company "Canyon" which presented a prototype last year, with double 120mm disk brake at the front for a total bike weight of 6.8 kg. Production has not yet started afaik.
Dan
1) It doesn't matter where you put the brake. Unless the wheels are extremely heavy, the bending load on the fork won't change for a given weight and deceleration.
2) You're thinking about strength, not stiffness. And you would have to move a lot of heat through the caliper assembly to get the fork legs that hot.
3) Unless your front hub is made out of rubber, both sides can transmit torque. Radial spokes are out of the question though. (We wouldn't want to contradict the last ten years of marketing, would we?)
4) You could probably come up even on the weight by cutting down the rim (tubular anyway), but there's still no good reason to do it.