"LeeG" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:The direct.gov.uk website has been getting a lot of radio advertising
recently.
I thought I'd have a look to see what was on about cycling.
I found this
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/CyclingAndWalking/DG_4018700
I would describe the content at best as poor.
Under equipment it lists
a.. a safety helmet
b.. a bell to let pedestrians and motorists know you are there
I'm glad that they explain what a bell is for.
They don't explain what the safety helmet is for.
Mostly anodyne, but didn't there used to be a campaign about cyclists
carrying heavy rucksacks?
"a rucksack for carrying small items"
I checked the HC to find out if there was anything in there, but not about
rucksacks.
However, the illustration on this page
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/DG_069837 is
worth looking at: neither the "tick" or the "cross" cyclist has trouser
clips, and with jeans like that, they're just asking for them to be caught
in the chain and make them fall off. Never mind, the "tick" one is safe:
he's got a helmet and a Sam Browne. The HA drivers that write the HC should
be taken out and shot, slowly. Perhaps this is minor given the incredible
nonsense about making cyclists use "facilities" but it's very illustrative
of the thinking, or lack of, of the people who compile this booklet.