General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Difference between sebaceous cyst and a zit?

Started by Plabord · · Last activity · 8 posts · 2,395 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 June 2004
Last activity
25 June 2004
Original author
Plabord
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,395
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. For about two months now I've had what I think is a
    sebaceous cyst on my scalp, and while I'm waiting for my
    appointment with the surgeon, I've decided to read up on the
    topic. So far I get the impression that a sebaceous cyst is
    similar to a big zit. But from what I understand, a
    sebaceous cyst can't be popped like a zit, because there is
    a "sac" that needs to be removed or the whole thing will
    grow back. However I remember as a teenager popping my zits
    away, even huge ones (once ripe, of course), and most of the
    time they didn't return at all. Why is there a sac in the
    cyst but not in the zit?

    PL

  2. "plabord" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    For about two months now I've had what I think is a
    sebaceous cyst on my scalp, and while I'm waiting for my
    appointment with the surgeon, I've decided to read up on
    the topic. So far I get the impression that a sebaceous
    cyst is similar to a big zit. But from what I understand,
    a sebaceous cyst can't be popped like a zit, because there
    is a "sac" that needs to be removed or the whole thing
    will grow back. However I remember as a teenager popping
    my zits away, even huge ones (once ripe, of course), and
    most of the time they didn't return at all. Why is there a
    sac in the cyst but not in the zit?

    Sebum vs. pus.

    HMc

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sebum vs. pus.

    HMc

    So then it's no riskier to pop a cyst that a zit? Then
    why all the warnings everywhere about a sac that has to
    be removed?

    PL

  4. "plabord" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sebum vs. pus.

    HMc

    So then it's no riskier to pop a cyst that a zit? Then why
    all the warnings everywhere about a sac that has to be
    removed?

    PL

    No risk at all. It's the difference between a cyst and an
    abscess. If you "pop a zit", you are, in essence draining an
    abscess and it heals once drained. If you pop a sebaceous
    cyst, you will empty the cyst capsule but as long as the
    cyst wall remains, the cyst will just reform. The cyst wall
    ("sac"😉 has to be removed.

    Most sebaceous cysts will eventually become infected. It
    REALLY sucks when that happens.

    HMc

  5. Quoted message said:

    Most sebaceous cysts will eventually become infected. It
    REALLY sucks when that happens.

    HMc

    Thanks for the responses.

    My appointment with the surgeon is two weeks from now, and
    I'm really tempted to lance the thing. I know there are no
    guarantees, but if I sterilize the needle and wipe the area
    with alcohol, etc., would lancing it decrease the chances of
    infection, since these cysts seem to get infected on their
    own anyway, or increase them? Again, I know there are no
    guarantees, but just in general in your experience.

    PL

  6. (plabord) said:

    I'm really tempted to lance the thing. I know there are no
    guarantees, but if I sterilize the needle and wipe the
    area with alcohol, etc., would lancing it decrease the
    chances of infection...or increase them?

    IMHO, poking a hole in the thing would probably *increase*
    the chance of infection.

  7. "plabord" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Most sebaceous cysts will eventually become infected. It
    REALLY sucks


    when

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that happens.

    HMc

    Thanks for the responses.

    My appointment with the surgeon is two weeks from now, and
    I'm really tempted to lance the thing. I know there are no
    guarantees, but if I sterilize the needle and wipe the
    area with alcohol, etc., would lancing it decrease the
    chances of infection, since these cysts seem to get
    infected on their own anyway, or increase them? Again, I
    know there are no guarantees, but just in general in your
    experience.

    "Lancing" it will accomplish nothing except possibly get it
    infected and certainly making the surgeon's job harder. If a
    patient came to me wanting their sebaceous, and they had
    just "lanced" it, I would tell the patient we had to wait
    until it healed before we would try to excise it.

    HMc

  8. Thanks for the responses.

    PL

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.