Road Cycling · Public discussion

[censored] Pound: My Dinners with Andre

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 32 posts · 863 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 June 2006
Last activity
26 June 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
32
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
863
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 32
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Back when this whole L'Equipe [censored] came out, and Pound was spewing
    inappropriate statements to the press day after day, I decided to try
    and write to the WADA board to express my disdain for how Pound was
    destroying the credibility of the organization (and the whole anti-dope
    movement). Before I could do that, I needed to know *how* to contact
    members of the board. So I contacted WADA's PR dept and was quickly
    turned away, the PR staff stated that [censored] Pound himself would have to
    give permission for them to release this info (and that he had just
    rejected my request).

    I later googled around, and found the email address of one board
    member, (an American attorney, Richard Young) in addition to Pound's
    email at his law firm. Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA). I received an odd email from Pound after I tried
    contacting Mr Young, and we began a strange email conversation. Pound
    was crude, rude, and very candid in his belief that Armstrong must be
    guilty. When I pointed out that what the anti-doping movement needed
    was credibility, and at least the appearance of objectivity on the part
    of WADA, he would predict that "when this all concludes, I predict I
    won't be hearing from you anymore". He was obviously of the opinion
    that Armstrong was 100% guilty.

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked. Right afterwards, I heard from Pound, writing
    back, wondering why "I was afraid to ask the real questions" regarding
    Armstrong.

    It became very obvious that Pound is not just chairman of a supposedly
    "independent" organization. He controls that organization AND its
    board. He does not simply report TO the organization. WADA is
    effectively omnipotent. If WADA were to be out of control, there would
    be no way to bring them back into-check.

    I decided to hang-on to my numerous email exchanges with Mr. Young and
    [censored] Pound. Might prove useful someday if anyone were to ever mount a
    realistic, direct challenge to Pound's authority. I was actually
    surprised to see Armstrong as the guy who mounted that challenge.
    Oddly enough, it was my interest in seeing Armstrong someday exposed
    (and sanctioned) that made me come to realize that Pound was eroding
    any possibility of that ever happening. He never knew when to sit back
    and let "the process" work itself out. He was always right out there
    destroying the credibility of the organization with his huge mouth.

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and
    credibility in the world of sport to bring this attention to Pound. But
    I'm willing to ride that train, if it is the only train with enough
    weight to get the right people at the IOC to listen.

    So after the UCI report, the WADA response, and Armstrong's letters...I
    made contact with Bill Stapleton two days ago. I turned over some juicy
    emails, complete with Pound's quotes that members of the IOC will
    likely be very interested in reading.

    We deserve to have a WADA-like organization, but when the organization
    becomes synonymous with the obviously biased, hot-headed, unrestrained
    [censored] Pound, we need to see him go, and NOW. Perhaps that means
    severing ties with WADA, and starting all over again. Who knows what
    kind of personal financial interest that Pound might have with WADA.
    If he is unwilling to weather basic criticism from some schmo in the
    USA (me), then I figure that the WADA onion must have many layers to
    peel-back.

    Enjoy the ride. It's going to get bumpy/

  2. Quoted message said:

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and

    Explain this;
    So how does a guy who has a tv camera following him around 24/7, i.e.
    Discovery Channel "road to the tour", manage to do all this doping you
    are accusing him of?

    If I used Lafferty logic and applied it to golf, then Tiger Woods must
    be a cheat also.
    You guys are ridiculous.

  3. Quoted message said:

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and

    Explain this;
    So how does a guy who has a tv camera following him around 24/7, i.e.
    Discovery Channel "road to the tour", manage to do all this doping you
    are accusing him of?

    If I used Lafferty logic and applied it to golf, then Tiger Woods must
    be a cheat also.
    You guys are ridiculous.

  4. Don't hold on to your emails. Send them to the press. Reuters, VeloNews,
    CyclingNews, AFP. Take your pick.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Back when this whole L'Equipe [censored] came out, and Pound was spewing
    inappropriate statements to the press day after day, I decided to try
    and write to the WADA board to express my disdain for how Pound was
    destroying the credibility of the organization (and the whole anti-dope
    movement). Before I could do that, I needed to know *how* to contact
    members of the board. So I contacted WADA's PR dept and was quickly
    turned away, the PR staff stated that [censored] Pound himself would have to
    give permission for them to release this info (and that he had just
    rejected my request).

    I later googled around, and found the email address of one board
    member, (an American attorney, Richard Young) in addition to Pound's
    email at his law firm. Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA). I received an odd email from Pound after I tried
    contacting Mr Young, and we began a strange email conversation. Pound
    was crude, rude, and very candid in his belief that Armstrong must be
    guilty. When I pointed out that what the anti-doping movement needed
    was credibility, and at least the appearance of objectivity on the part
    of WADA, he would predict that "when this all concludes, I predict I
    won't be hearing from you anymore". He was obviously of the opinion
    that Armstrong was 100% guilty.

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked. Right afterwards, I heard from Pound, writing
    back, wondering why "I was afraid to ask the real questions" regarding
    Armstrong.

    It became very obvious that Pound is not just chairman of a supposedly
    "independent" organization. He controls that organization AND its
    board. He does not simply report TO the organization. WADA is
    effectively omnipotent. If WADA were to be out of control, there would
    be no way to bring them back into-check.

    I decided to hang-on to my numerous email exchanges with Mr. Young and
    [censored] Pound. Might prove useful someday if anyone were to ever mount a
    realistic, direct challenge to Pound's authority. I was actually
    surprised to see Armstrong as the guy who mounted that challenge.
    Oddly enough, it was my interest in seeing Armstrong someday exposed
    (and sanctioned) that made me come to realize that Pound was eroding
    any possibility of that ever happening. He never knew when to sit back
    and let "the process" work itself out. He was always right out there
    destroying the credibility of the organization with his huge mouth.

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and
    credibility in the world of sport to bring this attention to Pound. But
    I'm willing to ride that train, if it is the only train with enough
    weight to get the right people at the IOC to listen.

    So after the UCI report, the WADA response, and Armstrong's letters...I
    made contact with Bill Stapleton two days ago. I turned over some juicy
    emails, complete with Pound's quotes that members of the IOC will
    likely be very interested in reading.

    We deserve to have a WADA-like organization, but when the organization
    becomes synonymous with the obviously biased, hot-headed, unrestrained
    [censored] Pound, we need to see him go, and NOW. Perhaps that means
    severing ties with WADA, and starting all over again. Who knows what
    kind of personal financial interest that Pound might have with WADA.
    If he is unwilling to weather basic criticism from some schmo in the
    USA (me), then I figure that the WADA onion must have many layers to
    peel-back.

    Enjoy the ride. It's going to get bumpy/

  5. Don't hold on to your emails. Send them to the press. Reuters, VeloNews,
    CyclingNews, AFP. Take your pick.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Back when this whole L'Equipe [censored] came out, and Pound was spewing
    inappropriate statements to the press day after day, I decided to try
    and write to the WADA board to express my disdain for how Pound was
    destroying the credibility of the organization (and the whole anti-dope
    movement). Before I could do that, I needed to know *how* to contact
    members of the board. So I contacted WADA's PR dept and was quickly
    turned away, the PR staff stated that [censored] Pound himself would have to
    give permission for them to release this info (and that he had just
    rejected my request).

    I later googled around, and found the email address of one board
    member, (an American attorney, Richard Young) in addition to Pound's
    email at his law firm. Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA). I received an odd email from Pound after I tried
    contacting Mr Young, and we began a strange email conversation. Pound
    was crude, rude, and very candid in his belief that Armstrong must be
    guilty. When I pointed out that what the anti-doping movement needed
    was credibility, and at least the appearance of objectivity on the part
    of WADA, he would predict that "when this all concludes, I predict I
    won't be hearing from you anymore". He was obviously of the opinion
    that Armstrong was 100% guilty.

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked. Right afterwards, I heard from Pound, writing
    back, wondering why "I was afraid to ask the real questions" regarding
    Armstrong.

    It became very obvious that Pound is not just chairman of a supposedly
    "independent" organization. He controls that organization AND its
    board. He does not simply report TO the organization. WADA is
    effectively omnipotent. If WADA were to be out of control, there would
    be no way to bring them back into-check.

    I decided to hang-on to my numerous email exchanges with Mr. Young and
    [censored] Pound. Might prove useful someday if anyone were to ever mount a
    realistic, direct challenge to Pound's authority. I was actually
    surprised to see Armstrong as the guy who mounted that challenge.
    Oddly enough, it was my interest in seeing Armstrong someday exposed
    (and sanctioned) that made me come to realize that Pound was eroding
    any possibility of that ever happening. He never knew when to sit back
    and let "the process" work itself out. He was always right out there
    destroying the credibility of the organization with his huge mouth.

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and
    credibility in the world of sport to bring this attention to Pound. But
    I'm willing to ride that train, if it is the only train with enough
    weight to get the right people at the IOC to listen.

    So after the UCI report, the WADA response, and Armstrong's letters...I
    made contact with Bill Stapleton two days ago. I turned over some juicy
    emails, complete with Pound's quotes that members of the IOC will
    likely be very interested in reading.

    We deserve to have a WADA-like organization, but when the organization
    becomes synonymous with the obviously biased, hot-headed, unrestrained
    [censored] Pound, we need to see him go, and NOW. Perhaps that means
    severing ties with WADA, and starting all over again. Who knows what
    kind of personal financial interest that Pound might have with WADA.
    If he is unwilling to weather basic criticism from some schmo in the
    USA (me), then I figure that the WADA onion must have many layers to
    peel-back.

    Enjoy the ride. It's going to get bumpy/

  6. Post your e-mails with [censored] here on rec.bicycles.racing!!!

    That would be cool. Thanks in advance.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Back when this whole L'Equipe [censored] came out, and Pound was spewing
    inappropriate statements to the press day after day, I decided to try
    and write to the WADA board to express my disdain for how Pound was
    destroying the credibility of the organization (and the whole anti-dope
    movement). Before I could do that, I needed to know *how* to contact
    members of the board. So I contacted WADA's PR dept and was quickly
    turned away, the PR staff stated that [censored] Pound himself would have to
    give permission for them to release this info (and that he had just
    rejected my request).

    I later googled around, and found the email address of one board
    member, (an American attorney, Richard Young) in addition to Pound's
    email at his law firm. Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA). I received an odd email from Pound after I tried
    contacting Mr Young, and we began a strange email conversation. Pound
    was crude, rude, and very candid in his belief that Armstrong must be
    guilty. When I pointed out that what the anti-doping movement needed
    was credibility, and at least the appearance of objectivity on the part
    of WADA, he would predict that "when this all concludes, I predict I
    won't be hearing from you anymore". He was obviously of the opinion
    that Armstrong was 100% guilty.

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked. Right afterwards, I heard from Pound, writing
    back, wondering why "I was afraid to ask the real questions" regarding
    Armstrong.

    It became very obvious that Pound is not just chairman of a supposedly
    "independent" organization. He controls that organization AND its
    board. He does not simply report TO the organization. WADA is
    effectively omnipotent. If WADA were to be out of control, there would
    be no way to bring them back into-check.

    I decided to hang-on to my numerous email exchanges with Mr. Young and
    [censored] Pound. Might prove useful someday if anyone were to ever mount a
    realistic, direct challenge to Pound's authority. I was actually
    surprised to see Armstrong as the guy who mounted that challenge.
    Oddly enough, it was my interest in seeing Armstrong someday exposed
    (and sanctioned) that made me come to realize that Pound was eroding
    any possibility of that ever happening. He never knew when to sit back
    and let "the process" work itself out. He was always right out there
    destroying the credibility of the organization with his huge mouth.

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and
    credibility in the world of sport to bring this attention to Pound. But
    I'm willing to ride that train, if it is the only train with enough
    weight to get the right people at the IOC to listen.

    So after the UCI report, the WADA response, and Armstrong's letters...I
    made contact with Bill Stapleton two days ago. I turned over some juicy
    emails, complete with Pound's quotes that members of the IOC will
    likely be very interested in reading.

    We deserve to have a WADA-like organization, but when the organization
    becomes synonymous with the obviously biased, hot-headed, unrestrained
    [censored] Pound, we need to see him go, and NOW. Perhaps that means
    severing ties with WADA, and starting all over again. Who knows what
    kind of personal financial interest that Pound might have with WADA.
    If he is unwilling to weather basic criticism from some schmo in the
    USA (me), then I figure that the WADA onion must have many layers to
    peel-back.

    Enjoy the ride. It's going to get bumpy/

  7. Post your e-mails with [censored] here on rec.bicycles.racing!!!

    That would be cool. Thanks in advance.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Back when this whole L'Equipe [censored] came out, and Pound was spewing
    inappropriate statements to the press day after day, I decided to try
    and write to the WADA board to express my disdain for how Pound was
    destroying the credibility of the organization (and the whole anti-dope
    movement). Before I could do that, I needed to know *how* to contact
    members of the board. So I contacted WADA's PR dept and was quickly
    turned away, the PR staff stated that [censored] Pound himself would have to
    give permission for them to release this info (and that he had just
    rejected my request).

    I later googled around, and found the email address of one board
    member, (an American attorney, Richard Young) in addition to Pound's
    email at his law firm. Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA). I received an odd email from Pound after I tried
    contacting Mr Young, and we began a strange email conversation. Pound
    was crude, rude, and very candid in his belief that Armstrong must be
    guilty. When I pointed out that what the anti-doping movement needed
    was credibility, and at least the appearance of objectivity on the part
    of WADA, he would predict that "when this all concludes, I predict I
    won't be hearing from you anymore". He was obviously of the opinion
    that Armstrong was 100% guilty.

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked. Right afterwards, I heard from Pound, writing
    back, wondering why "I was afraid to ask the real questions" regarding
    Armstrong.

    It became very obvious that Pound is not just chairman of a supposedly
    "independent" organization. He controls that organization AND its
    board. He does not simply report TO the organization. WADA is
    effectively omnipotent. If WADA were to be out of control, there would
    be no way to bring them back into-check.

    I decided to hang-on to my numerous email exchanges with Mr. Young and
    [censored] Pound. Might prove useful someday if anyone were to ever mount a
    realistic, direct challenge to Pound's authority. I was actually
    surprised to see Armstrong as the guy who mounted that challenge.
    Oddly enough, it was my interest in seeing Armstrong someday exposed
    (and sanctioned) that made me come to realize that Pound was eroding
    any possibility of that ever happening. He never knew when to sit back
    and let "the process" work itself out. He was always right out there
    destroying the credibility of the organization with his huge mouth.

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and
    credibility in the world of sport to bring this attention to Pound. But
    I'm willing to ride that train, if it is the only train with enough
    weight to get the right people at the IOC to listen.

    So after the UCI report, the WADA response, and Armstrong's letters...I
    made contact with Bill Stapleton two days ago. I turned over some juicy
    emails, complete with Pound's quotes that members of the IOC will
    likely be very interested in reading.

    We deserve to have a WADA-like organization, but when the organization
    becomes synonymous with the obviously biased, hot-headed, unrestrained
    [censored] Pound, we need to see him go, and NOW. Perhaps that means
    severing ties with WADA, and starting all over again. Who knows what
    kind of personal financial interest that Pound might have with WADA.
    If he is unwilling to weather basic criticism from some schmo in the
    USA (me), then I figure that the WADA onion must have many layers to
    peel-back.

    Enjoy the ride. It's going to get bumpy/

  8. Quoted message said:

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked.

    Oh you had me interested, but here you sound a little crazy. Would be
    helpful if you used a real email address with an actual name.

    I'm not taking that advice, but then again I'm not writing fantastic
    tales.

  9. Quoted message said:

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked.

    Oh you had me interested, but here you sound a little crazy. Would be
    helpful if you used a real email address with an actual name.

    I'm not taking that advice, but then again I'm not writing fantastic
    tales.

  10. Quoted message said:

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked.

    Oh you had me interested, but here you sound a little crazy. Would be
    helpful if you used a real email address with an actual name.

    I'm not taking that advice, but then again I'm not writing fantastic
    tales.

  11. Quoted message said:

    Pound (for some reason) despite his belief in his own personal
    righteousness, blocked every attempt at my writing to mebers of the
    WADA board. When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it. All the
    emails were blocked.

    Oh you had me interested, but here you sound a little crazy. Would be
    helpful if you used a real email address with an actual name.

    I'm not taking that advice, but then again I'm not writing fantastic
    tales.

  12. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme".

    And what's more, NO ONE ELSE could EVER learn how to dope as well or better
    than Armstrong.

    And why is it that Greg LeMond STILL holds the record for TT's in the Tour
    de France?

    Maybe HE'S the "Le Dopee Supreme"!!!

  13. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme".

    And what's more, NO ONE ELSE could EVER learn how to dope as well or better
    than Armstrong.

    And why is it that Greg LeMond STILL holds the record for TT's in the Tour
    de France?

    Maybe HE'S the "Le Dopee Supreme"!!!

  14. Tom Kunich said:

    And why is it that Greg LeMond STILL holds the record for TT's in the Tour
    de France?

    dumbass,

    your arguments always fall flat because you never have your facts
    straight.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour051

    "To beat Armstrong, Zabriskie rode the fastest TT in Tour De France
    history at an incredible average speed of 54.676 km/h, breaking Greg
    LeMond's 16 year old record (54.454 km/h in the final stage in 1989)."

  15. Tom Kunich said:

    And why is it that Greg LeMond STILL holds the record for TT's in the Tour
    de France?

    dumbass,

    your arguments always fall flat because you never have your facts
    straight.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour051

    "To beat Armstrong, Zabriskie rode the fastest TT in Tour De France
    history at an incredible average speed of 54.676 km/h, breaking Greg
    LeMond's 16 year old record (54.454 km/h in the final stage in 1989)."

  16. Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Quoted message said:

    Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA)

    Requests for contact with the WADA board are uncommon?
    If so blow the place up, ain't no place for a secret society.

    [censored] Pound responds personally to random people during the wildest time
    in his career? Did you promise pics of Lance with a needle in his arm or
    what?

    Quoted message said:

    When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it.

    Everything you said went to /dev/null after the above statement.

  17. Quoted message said:

    (Or, My emails with [censored] Pound)

    Quoted message said:

    Pound already knew who I was (from my uncommon
    request at WADA)

    Requests for contact with the WADA board are uncommon?
    If so blow the place up, ain't no place for a secret society.

    [censored] Pound responds personally to random people during the wildest time
    in his career? Did you promise pics of Lance with a needle in his arm or
    what?

    Quoted message said:

    When I figured out the email address naming convention for
    WADA, and sent-off my letter anyway, the WADA email server had already
    been configured to intercept anything with my IP address on it.

    Everything you said went to /dev/null after the above statement.

  18. CowPunk said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and

    Explain this;
    So how does a guy who has a tv camera following him around 24/7, i.e.
    Discovery Channel "road to the tour", manage to do all this doping you
    are accusing him of?

    If I used Lafferty logic and applied it to golf, then Tiger Woods must
    be a cheat also.
    You guys are ridiculous.

    Without reverting to the more indigenous Lance bashing and fully
    realizing most of it is circumstantial):

    1. He was most definitely not followed 24/7 during his preparation. And
    that's an important moment when dope is taken nowadays: during
    preparation, to heigthen the efficiency of the training.
    2. Epo is THE standard drug registered to Chemo-Therapy patients. Lance
    said quite a few times he never in his life took Epo. (And yes, I
    understand that he probably meant that he didnt take it as DOPING, but
    it can be seen as a falsehood).
    3. Lance thoroughly TRASHED notorious doping users. Epo and Growth
    Hormone are exceptionally effective for racing, yet he managed without.
    For many this stretches believe by quite a few miles.
    4. When a rider broke down about drug use in the Peloton Lance
    DESTROYED them, even when he wasn't implicated at all. Lance has been
    extremely aggressive to riders who tried to come clean... One would
    wonder why.
    5. US Postal have been using masking drugs, just before they were
    blacklisted.
    6. Bruyneel and the doctors made some disturbing remarks about the
    hematocrit levels of their riders. (Just before the tour they were all
    in the same 49.5 range, all within a point)
    7. The "Equipe" results (Of wich the results were not attacked at
    all...)

    This is far from proof, but if you look at the Coincidences and
    Circumstantial evidence you can hardly call people who doubt Lance was
    clean "rdiculous". They might be wrong, but they have quite good
    reasons to have these doubts.

  19. CowPunk said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I personally think Armstrong is "Le Dopee Supreme". And it is
    ironic that Armstrong is perhaps the only one with enough clout and

    Explain this;
    So how does a guy who has a tv camera following him around 24/7, i.e.
    Discovery Channel "road to the tour", manage to do all this doping you
    are accusing him of?

    If I used Lafferty logic and applied it to golf, then Tiger Woods must
    be a cheat also.
    You guys are ridiculous.

    Without reverting to the more indigenous Lance bashing and fully
    realizing most of it is circumstantial):

    1. He was most definitely not followed 24/7 during his preparation. And
    that's an important moment when dope is taken nowadays: during
    preparation, to heigthen the efficiency of the training.
    2. Epo is THE standard drug registered to Chemo-Therapy patients. Lance
    said quite a few times he never in his life took Epo. (And yes, I
    understand that he probably meant that he didnt take it as DOPING, but
    it can be seen as a falsehood).
    3. Lance thoroughly TRASHED notorious doping users. Epo and Growth
    Hormone are exceptionally effective for racing, yet he managed without.
    For many this stretches believe by quite a few miles.
    4. When a rider broke down about drug use in the Peloton Lance
    DESTROYED them, even when he wasn't implicated at all. Lance has been
    extremely aggressive to riders who tried to come clean... One would
    wonder why.
    5. US Postal have been using masking drugs, just before they were
    blacklisted.
    6. Bruyneel and the doctors made some disturbing remarks about the
    hematocrit levels of their riders. (Just before the tour they were all
    in the same 49.5 range, all within a point)
    7. The "Equipe" results (Of wich the results were not attacked at
    all...)

    This is far from proof, but if you look at the Coincidences and
    Circumstantial evidence you can hardly call people who doubt Lance was
    clean "rdiculous". They might be wrong, but they have quite good
    reasons to have these doubts.

  20. Quoted message said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    And why is it that Greg LeMond STILL holds the record for TT's in the Tour
    de France?

    dumbass,

    your arguments always fall flat because you never have your facts
    straight.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour051

    "To beat Armstrong, Zabriskie rode the fastest TT in Tour De France
    history at an incredible average speed of 54.676 km/h, breaking Greg
    LeMond's 16 year old record (54.454 km/h in the final stage in 1989)."

    Ahh, so he got the extra special Utah dope.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.