Denver's Trail System

Colorado Bicycler said:

www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~45~2814560,00.html

Article yesterday about Denver's Trails

Paths generally suck.

<http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~45~2759317,00.html>

Peter Cole said:

Colorado Bicycler said:

www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~45~2814560,00.html

Article yesterday about Denver's Trails

Paths generally suck.

<http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~45~2759317,00.html>

Nothings perfect. I like paths, altough on the weekend they can get
crowded.

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels
called upon to post a negative comment?

Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes expertise.

Colorado Bicycler whined anonymously:

Quoted message said:

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels
called upon to post a negative comment?

Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes

expertise.

I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't know
anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths and
all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source
described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought it
was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't
agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing article
there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

Actually, Colorado Bicycler made no judgements in the original post. He/she just seemed to want to share some information. You're the one who injected an opinion and created the beef. I've never been to Denver and if I go, I might want to try the trails, so thanks to CB for providing the info.

Peter Cole wrote:

Colorado Bicycler whined anonymously:

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels called upon to post a negative comment? Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes

expertise. I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't know anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths and all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought it was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing article there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

Actually, Colorado Bicycler made no judgements in the original post. He/she just seemed to want to share some information. You're the one who injected an opinion and created the beef. I've never been to Denver and if I go, I might want to try the trails, so thanks to CB for providing the info.

Peter Cole wrote:

Colorado Bicycler whined anonymously:

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels called upon to post a negative comment? Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes

expertise. I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't know anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths and all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought it was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing article there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

Actually, Colorado Bicycler made no judgements in the original post. He/she just seemed to want to share some information. You're the one who injected an opinion and created the beef. I've never been to Denver and if I go, I might want to try the trails, so thanks to CB for providing the info.

Peter Cole wrote:

Colorado Bicycler whined anonymously:

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels called upon to post a negative comment? Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes

expertise. I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't know anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths and all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought it was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing article there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

DennisU Topped:

Quoted message said:

Actually, Colorado Bicycler made no judgements in the original post.

He/she just seemed to want to share some information. You're the one
who injected an opinion and created the beef. I've never been to
Denver and if I go, I might want to try the trails, so thanks to CB for
providing the info.

Quoted message said:

Peter Cole wrote:
Colorado Bicycler whined anonymously:

Why is it that any time you post something positive, some yo-yo feels
called upon to post a negative comment?

Likely has NEVER ridden one of the Denver Trails, yet assumes
expertise.

I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't

know

Quoted message said:

anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths

and

Quoted message said:

all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source
described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought

it

Quoted message said:

was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't
agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing

article

Quoted message said:

there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

Actually, he thought it was positive, I thought it was negative. I
think that's what the two of you don't understand. I'm a non-believer,
a heretic, a heathen, someone who is actually anti-path. Besides, who
cares about Denver?

Hey, I didn't start calling names, either, and I don't top post. I
still think paths suck and so does top posting, although I generally
don't editorialize unless someone editorializes me first. I still won't
resort to calling someone stupid for liking bike paths or top posting
though, although there are many who would, but not me, I keep my
personal opinions to myself, because calling someone less than average
in the intelligence department would be rude, and if everyone pointed
out stupidity all the time there'd be hardly any space left to talk
about biking, not that path biking is really biking, though, but if you
like that sort of thing, or even top posting, I suppose it's not as bad
as golfing, but I still wouldn't call it biking, though, but that's
just me.

DennisU said:

I guess I'm the yo-yo! Same paper, right? What's the beef? I don't know
anything about your paths, but to a certain extent, paths are paths and
all suffer some of the same shortcomings. Since a local source
described some of those shortcomings of the *same* paths, I thought it
was fair, balanced and appropriate. You just don't like that I don't
agree with you. You love paths, I hate them. For every glowing article
there's one that shows the other side. Get over it.

</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

I don't know if you're a yo-yo or not...

But for the love of God Montresor, *stop* posting in HTML.

--
Dane Jackson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
"Roses are red, violets are blue,
I'm a schitzophrenic, and so am I."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I've never been to Denver and if I go, I might want to try the

trails, so thanks to CB for providing the info.

If you come, I will be pleased to give you the GRAND TOUR!

You would enjoy our trail system. I just did 25 miles this am, met
about 5 other humans, no dogs, no uncontrrolled kids, real nice!
Followed a lovely creek almost the entire distance. The birds were
singing. Saw one snake, but no deer today. Sky was gorgeous, temp
about a perfect 65F.