General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

decisions decisions.....

Started by Chris 159 · · Last activity · 23 posts · 1,955 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 June 2004
Last activity
25 June 2004
Original author
Chris 159
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,955
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. please help me out here -

    i bought a 65l rucksack off ebay and its [censored] basically, so
    i need to buy a 'decent' one.

    in our store of the moment ARGOS there's these 3 that i
    cannot decide between

    theres a karrimor 65l - argos.co.uks
    tores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=1000 1&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=93938

    a karrimor 65l - argos.co.uks
    ervlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=1000 1&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=93951

    and a pro action 90l - argos.co.ukst
    ores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=1000 1&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=83013

    the 90l would be more favourable obviously because its
    bigger but i want something thats going to good for the job.
    ie- plenty of external mounting points, comfortable,
    weatherproof, durable etc...

    what do you lot think ? do you know of any others which
    would be better but in the same kind of price range ?

    please share your thoughts

    chris

  2. Chris 159 said:


    what do you lot think ? do you know of any others which
    would be better but in the same kind of price range ?

    please share your thoughts

    If it was me, I would go for the more expensive of the two
    Karrimor rucksacks. ie the green one.

    My reasons:

    - I currently have a 65 litre Karrimor Jaguar rucksack and I
    like it. It's strong and well-built. It is not waterproof
    but I am in the habit of wrapping all my gear in plastic
    bags anyway.

    - Although the green rucksack is more expensive, in the
    sale, than the blue one it is a bigger saving - so you're
    getting more for your money.

    - I've not seen any pro-action rucksacks. This ng has raved
    about the pro-action tent but I've not heard much about
    the rucksacks. A full-price of 30 quid for a 90 litre sack
    worries me! (But 14.99 for a spare tent seems good!)

    - I can carry all my walking and camping gear in a 65 litre
    pack without *too much* pain. A 90 litre pack would
    encourage me to take too much with me. My aim is to have
    at least one back-packing camping trip using my (bought-from-Argos-
    today) Craghoppers 45 litre rucksack. Unless you like
    lifting heavy weights then don't get the 95 litre pack.

    Perhaps Argos would let you have a look before you
    bought? If not, you can take it back within 16 days for
    your money back.

    Judith

  3. If your after a Karrimor rucksack and live somewhere in the
    north west (near the M65 and Accrington) the closing down
    sale is still on at the Karrimor factory. They have hundreds
    of backpacking sacs for sale at less than half price.

    Cheers

    Andy

    "Chris 159" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    please help me out here -

    i bought a 65l rucksack off ebay and its [censored] basically,
    so i need to buy


    a

    Quoted message said:

    'decent' one.

    in our store of the moment ARGOS there's these 3 that i
    cannot decide between

    theres a karrimor 65l -


    argos.co.ukProductDis
    play?storeId=1000

    Quoted message said:

    1&langId=-1&catalogId=1751&productId=93938

    a karrimor 65l -


    argos.co.ukProductDis
    play?storeId=1000

    Quoted message said:

    1&langId=-1&catalogId=1751&productId=93951

    and a pro action 90l -


    argos.co.ukProductDis
    play?storeId=1000

    Quoted message said:

    1&langId=-1&catalogId=1751&productId=83013

    the 90l would be more favourable obviously because its
    bigger but i want something thats going to good for the
    job. ie- plenty of external mounting points, comfortable,
    weatherproof, durable etc...

    what do you lot think ? do you know of any others which
    would be better but in the same kind of price range ?

    please share your thoughts

    chris

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Judith <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:15:42 +0100, "AndyP" <[email hidden]-

    spam.co.uk said:

    I think the only sleeping bag Karrimor ever did was an
    ultralight down one under the KIMM label

    That's what I'm looking for, I think.

    Kimmlite (an offshoot under a Karrimor founder) does the
    KIMM gear now. Their sleeping bags are here:

    kimmlite.comsleepingbags.html

    I would be extremely surprised if there were any on offer at
    the K factory shop - but if so get one for me ;-)

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  5. On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:31:10 +0100, "Andy Laycock"

    Quoted message said:

    They have hundreds of backpacking sacs for sale at less
    than half price.

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Judith

  6. "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris 159 said:


    what do you lot think ? do you know of any others which
    would be better but in the same kind of price range ?

    please share your thoughts

    If it was me, I would go for the more expensive of the two
    Karrimor rucksacks. ie the green one.

    My reasons:

    - I currently have a 65 litre Karrimor Jaguar rucksack and
    I like it. It's strong and well-built. It is not
    waterproof but I am in the habit of wrapping all my gear
    in plastic bags anyway.

    - Although the green rucksack is more expensive, in the
    sale, than the blue one it is a bigger saving - so
    you're getting more for your money.

    - I've not seen any pro-action rucksacks. This ng has
    raved about the pro-action tent but I've not heard much
    about the rucksacks. A full-price of 30 quid for a 90
    litre sack worries me! (But 14.99 for a spare tent seems
    good!)

    - I can carry all my walking and camping gear in a 65
    litre pack without *too much* pain. A 90 litre pack
    would encourage me to take too much with me. My aim is
    to have at least one back-packing camping trip using my
    (bought-from-Argos-today) Craghoppers 45 litre rucksack.
    Unless you like lifting heavy weights then don't get the
    95 litre pack.

    Perhaps Argos would let you have a look before you
    bought? If not, you can take it back within 16 days for
    your money back.

    Judith

    Argos did let me look at them before i bought. i ended up
    getting the cheaper (blue) karrimor at £25 because they
    didnt have the dearer one in stock. i also looked at the pro-
    action sack and to be honest i think it's a fantastic sack
    for the price. it seems to be well constructed, has good
    straps and padding etc... but the thing that put me off was
    the fact that it doesnt have a seperate bottom section.

    anyway - i got my new karrimor so i'm going to pack it now
    :-)

  7. Quoted message said:

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Can't remember about sleeping bags seemed to be mainly
    rucsacs and boots (for those people with sizes at the
    extremes). A lot of the best stuff has gone already (i.e.
    Paclite waterproofs etc.) but they seem to be getting bits
    of deliveries every other day or so.

    Worth a look if you happen to be passing but not worth
    travelling a long way for.

    Cheers

    Andy

  8. Judith said:

    On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:31:10 +0100, "Andy Laycock"

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    They have hundreds of backpacking sacs for sale at less
    than half price.

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Yes.

    Vaude Travel Light Sleeping Bag £30.00 (was£60)app/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=92422>

    Ultralight 1000 150gsm Mummy Bag £25pp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=85107>

    Vaude Travel Ultralight Sleeping Bag £22.50 (was £45.00)app/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=92440>

    Pro Action 300gsm Mummy Bag £12.99 (was £19.99)app/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=85846>

    And for all you budding members of IRapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&langId=-
    1&catalogId=1751&productId=98947>

    :-)
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"
    95/284 5/219 c.100/300 (>900m with drop>100m )

  9. Chris 159 said:

    it doesnt have a seperate bottom section.

    Gosh. 90 litres sounds *huge* for an un-partitioned bag. I,
    too, prefer a separate section at the bottom for my
    sleeping bag.

    Quoted message said:

    anyway - i got my new karrimor so i'm going to pack
    it now :-)

    Enjoy it. I've already broken my new Crag Hoppers rucksack
    :-( I'll be phoning them for some new clips tomorrow.

    Judith

  10. Phil Cook said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Yes.

    No, I meant does the Karrimor place have sleeping bags? I've
    already cleared out Argos!

    An ex-colleague of mine had a tiny sleeping bag which I'm
    sure he got from the Karrimor factory outlet. It may be
    worth a trip, I s'pose.

    Judith

  11. "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris 159 said:

    it doesnt have a seperate bottom section.

    Gosh. 90 litres sounds *huge* for an un-partitioned bag.

    i think it would have been too big for me. i've got just
    about everything i need (and things i maybe wont need) in
    the 65l and theres still a bit of space left

    Quoted message said:

    I, too, prefer a separate section at the bottom for my
    sleeping bag.

    i use the bottom section for my trangia, ration packs, cup
    etc... always best to keep the food where i can get to it
    quickly lol

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    anyway - i got my new karrimor so i'm going to pack it
    now :-)

    Enjoy it. I've already broken my new Crag Hoppers rucksack
    :-( I'll be phoning them for some new clips tomorrow.

    :-( thats not a good start

  12. Judith said:

    Gosh. 90 litres sounds *huge* for an un-partitioned bag. I,
    too, prefer a separate section at the bottom for my
    sleeping bag.

    90 litres is *huge* no matter what the configuration, its an
    expedition sac really, one to carry as little as possible
    and dump as early as possible.

    ...think of it this way 90 litres = 90kg (of liquid) 8-)

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    thenmc.org.ukindex.php

    NMC website: thenmc.org.ukthenmc.org.uk

  13. Judith said:

    Gosh. 90 litres sounds *huge* for an un-partitioned bag.
    I, too, prefer a separate section at the bottom for my
    sleeping bag.

    My big bag will go up to about 85 if I push the extension up
    all the way. It has a zip out divider shelf but it's /years/
    since I've used
    it. As long as you've got a separate entrance at the bottom
    IME an actual physical partition in the bag isn't that
    useful and just serves to make optimising the packing
    more difficult.

    My sleeping bag usually travels in a lightweight Ortlieb dry-
    bag, which is all the "separate section" it needs. It
    completely isolates the bag from the rest of the contents
    and is easy enough to pull out on its own.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111
    ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382
    640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net
    [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  14. Judith said:

    On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:23:02 +0100, Phil Cook <u-r-walk@p-t-

    cook.RfErMeOeVsEeCrAvPeS.co.uk said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Yes.

    No, I meant does the Karrimor place have sleeping bags?
    I've already cleared out Argos!

    Soz. Realised that just after I'd posted.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"
    95/284 5/219 c.100/300 (>900m with drop>100m )

  15. "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oooh. Do they have any sleeping bags?

    Yes.

    No, I meant does the Karrimor place have sleeping bags?
    I've already cleared out Argos!

    Could be wrong but I think the only sleeping bag Karrimor
    ever did was an ultralight down one under the KIMM label.
    Don't think they did a full range.

  16. Steve Orrell said:

    90 litres is *huge* no matter what the configuration, its
    an expedition sac really, one to carry as little as
    possible and dump as early as possible.

    Not necessarily. Think of it this way, you won't need to
    compress your sleeping bag. You could pack a few helium
    baloons too.

    Quoted message said:

    ...think of it this way 90 litres = 90kg (of liquid) 8-)

    That's room for a lot of beer! A good choice of sack for Ian
    Dainty I think. Just the job for his style of wild camping.
    I seem to remember him carrying two large carrier bags in
    addition to his overstuffed rucksack on the Dartmoor
    expedition.

    Paul
    --
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukwildwales.fsnet.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

  17. While we're on the subject of backpacks I recently needed to
    buy a replacement pack for backpacking, about 75 litres. I
    really had a look around and have ended up with an Osprey 75
    litre Crescent Bag. I don¹t know anyone who has used an
    Osprey before but I'm very impressed. Their whole range
    looks very good - real quality and not too pricey. A worthy
    alternative to MacPac and the rest if you have easy access
    to Snow and Rock or Field and Trek

    --
    Andy Howell Birmingham, UK

  18. AndyP said:

    I think the only sleeping bag Karrimor ever did was an
    ultralight down one under the KIMM label

    That's what I'm looking for, I think.

    When I go camping, I take the world on my back. I take far
    too much stuff. However, one of these days I am going to
    have an enjoyable walking/camping trip with a 45 litre
    rucksack. So, I'm looking for a tiny, light, warm, cheap
    sleeping bag [1] and I had a feeling that Karrimor had (at
    some point) made one.

    I will never be a Mountain (or any other sort of) Marathon-
    runner, though!

    Judith
    [1] Don't want much, do I. Alternatively, I need a Sherpa.

  19. AndyP said:

    Could be wrong but I think the only sleeping bag Karrimor
    ever did was an ultralight down one under the KIMM label.
    Don't think they did a full range.

    Snow Tiger, Ice Tiger...

    Paul
    --
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukwildwales.fsnet.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

  20. "Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Could be wrong but I think the only sleeping bag
    Karrimor ever did was an ultralight down one under the
    KIMM label. Don't think they did a full range.

    Quoted message said:

    Snow Tiger, Ice Tiger...

    Bengal Tiger, Siberian Tiger. What are the rules in
    this game?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.