day 4.

Quoting FOB:

Quoted message said:

Suze <suze_andersonATspamcopDOTnet@> stated
|
| Hmmm, wonder why you had no comment here.
| LOL

It's pointless to argue with people who make up their own facts.

I never, and I mean never make up facts. If you think you can prove
otherwise, please post proof or STFU.

You are nothing more than an outright liar, plain and simple.

Oh, and here is what you snipped:
************************

Quoted message said:

| She came back swinging as she generally does, and I'll let you google
| who had words for the other one first in case you missed it
| (apparently you did). Not the first time either.

Hmmm, wonder why you had no comment here.
LOL
***********************

Quoted message said:

| Could you be anymore passive-aggressive in your attempts to deflect?

Probably, if I worked at it.

Too late, you already were and still you choose to be coy about your
nonsense.

Quoted message said:

|| Anything Lorelei or Saffire has
|| done is far less offensive than what JC does on a consistent basis
|
| Hardly. Both of them are manipulative, intellectually dishonest
| attention [censored].

And you aren't?

Oh look, another pathetic attempt to deflect.

Quoted message said:

| Nice non-sequitur. Better yet, why don't you ask yourself why YOU
| come here.

I come here because it amuses me.
|
| You won't, though. You'd rather go on and on about what a meaniehead
| JC is, and how you just found this kewl new recipe and the net carbs
| are only x, and how you just don't choose to do the work to lose any
| more weight so you're not obese anymore, blah blah blah.

I don't go on about JC, I sometimes spar with him,

You 'think' you spar with certain people.

Quoted message said:

I just mentioned him as I
think it is a mark of your personality disorder that you stick up for him
so.

Again, who's stickin' up for him?

Here's another part you selectively snipped:

****************************

Quoted message said:

Well, I guess I will never understand why you think JC needs (or deserves)
defending,

Who said he needed defending? Not I.
Wouldn't dream of it.

And, this exchange doesn't have much of anything to do with him,
really.

Quoted message said:

but I guess it takes all kinds.

Could you be anymore passive-aggressive in your attempts to deflect?
*************************

Quoted message said:

| Let me know when you have an actual point to bring or address.

Don't worry, I won't bother responding to you anymore, it's like talking to
a wall.

Translation: you can't and won't address the points, so you just sling
invective and tell outright lies instead.

Weak, oh so very weak and dishonest.

You may go now.

Quoting Lorelei:

Quoted message said:

"Suze" <suze_andersonATspamcopDOTnet> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Saffire said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
> I just missed you so much that I had to come back to hear some of your
> moronic BS. I wish prostate cancer on you.

Don't tell me, let me guess -- you're talking to JC, aren't you?

Duh, sure she is. One of the very first posts she made coming back to
the group was attacking JC before he ever typed a single word to her
(and it's not the first or even second time she's done this either).
Make no mistake, she likes to play. Funny that you never have
anything to say about stuff like that.

In case you haven't figured it out yet (right/wrong/indifferent) she
is not a Nice Person.

I definitely agree with this part of my post.

Quoted message said:

PLONK

Yeah, that's about the third or fourth time you've claimed to do so.
But yet you still can't stop responding to my posts.

Quoted message said:

I've been coming here off an on since 1999. so do a little research.

Big woop.

I don't care if you've been comin' here since 1989, you have proven
yourself to be about as disingenuous and nasty as they come.

So, do a little research on how to be an upright, intellectually
honest person.

"I just missed you so much that I had to come back to hear some of
your moronic BS. I wish prostate cancer on you."

"FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In news:[email hidden],
Suze <suze_andersonATspamcopDOTnet@> stated
|| Anything Lorelei or Saffire has
|| done is far less offensive than what JC does on a consistent basis
|
| Hardly. Both of them are manipulative, intellectually dishonest
| attention [censored].

And you aren't?

com'on tell us how you Really feel.

"Lorelei" <[email hidden]> obviously still isn't through
talking to and about me:

Quoted message said:

"FOB" <[email hidden]> couldn't answer the
questions, so she just posted a bunch of silly BS:

Quoted message said:

Suze stated:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

|| Anything Lorelei or Saffire has
|| done is far less offensive than what JC does on a consistent basis
|
| Hardly. Both of them are manipulative, intellectually dishonest
| attention [censored].

When I'm right, I'm right 🙂. And you just keep proving it again and
again.

If I'm supposedly killfiled, why are you still responding to my posts?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

And you aren't?

com'on tell us how you Really feel.

Okie doke. Let us go down that path since you brought it up. Yeah,
I think she should tell "us" how she feels too. But the problem is
that she just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to properly
format and present any sort of coherent argument, so she just posts a
bunch of yappy passive-aggressive top posted [censored] that just won't
stand up to any sort of examination.

In other words, she'd rather attempt to attack and slander folks in
her nasty ass phony phuck peyton place way rather than have the
ovaries or decency to engage in an actual discussion. And "thaffy" is
the same way. And so are you. Total fakes.

For anyone with even half a clue, it is to laugh.

Any thing else for me?
Let me know.

LOL

And I forgot a smiley face to show my terrific sense of humor. lol
"FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

She didn't respond to your post, she responded to mine. Learn to read.

In news:[email hidden],
Suze <suze_andersonATspamcopDOTnet@> stated
| "Lorelei" <[email hidden]> obviously still isn't through
| talking to and about me:
|| "FOB" <[email hidden]> couldn't answer the
|| questions, so she just posted a bunch of silly BS:
||| Suze stated:
|
||||| Anything Lorelei or Saffire has
||||| done is far less offensive than what JC does on a consistent basis
||||
|||| Hardly. Both of them are manipulative, intellectually dishonest
|||| attention [censored].
|
| When I'm right, I'm right 🙂. And you just keep proving it again and
| again.
|
| If I'm supposedly killfiled, why are you still responding to my posts?
|
||| And you aren't?
||
|| com'on tell us how you Really feel.
|
| Okie doke. Let us go down that path since you brought it up. Yeah,
| I think she should tell "us" how she feels too. But the problem is
| that she just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to properly
| format and present any sort of coherent argument, so she just posts a
| bunch of yappy passive-aggressive top posted [censored] that just won't
| stand up to any sort of examination.
|
| In other words, she'd rather attempt to attack and slander folks in
| her nasty ass phony phuck peyton place way rather than have the
| ovaries or decency to engage in an actual discussion. And "thaffy" is
| the same way. And so are you. Total fakes.
|
| For anyone with even half a clue, it is to laugh.
|
| Any thing else for me?
| Let me know.
|
| LOL

FOB said:

Suze <suze_andersonATspamcopDOTnet@> stated
| "Lorelei" <[email hidden]> obviously still isn't through
| talking to and about me:
|| "FOB" <[email hidden]> couldn't answer the
|| questions, so she just posted a bunch of silly BS:
||| Suze stated:
|
||||| Anything Lorelei or Saffire has
||||| done is far less offensive than what JC does on a consistent basis
||||
|||| Hardly. Both of them are manipulative, intellectually dishonest
|||| attention [censored].
|
| When I'm right, I'm right 🙂. And you just keep proving it again and
| again.
|
| If I'm supposedly killfiled, why are you still responding to my posts?
|
||| And you aren't?
||
|| com'on tell us how you Really feel.
|
| Okie doke. Let us go down that path since you brought it up. Yeah,
| I think she should tell "us" how she feels too. But the problem is
| that she just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to properly
| format and present any sort of coherent argument, so she just posts a
| bunch of yappy passive-aggressive top posted [censored] that just won't
| stand up to any sort of examination.
|
| In other words, she'd rather attempt to attack and slander folks in
| her nasty ass phony phuck peyton place way rather than have the
| ovaries or decency to engage in an actual discussion. And "thaffy" is
| the same way. And so are you. Total fakes.
|
| For anyone with even half a clue, it is to laugh.
|
| Any thing else for me?
| Let me know.
|
| LOL

Quoted message said:

She didn't respond to your post, she responded to mine.

Duh (nice passive-aggressive try to get at me, though). She responded
to the thread -- on a public, archived newsgroup.

Don't like it? Then feel free to take further discussions with her to
private e-mail.

Quoted message said:

Learn to read.

Learn to read what? In your response (and without selectively
snipping), please point out (and also try being intellectually honest
for a change) where I may have misunderstood anything whatsoever that
was written.

Oh, and were you ever going to respond to this post, non-sequitur
girl?
*************

Quoted message said:

It's pointless to argue with people who make up their own facts.

I never, and I mean never make up facts. If you think you can prove
otherwise, please post proof or STFU.

You are nothing more than an outright liar, plain and simple.
***************
Like I said before, let's see that proof I've ever made up any facts.
Tapping foot...

Through nippin' at my heels yet?