Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20

Started by JoeDe · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,308 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
2 March 2008
Last activity
5 March 2008
Original author
JoeDe
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,308
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok, so does anyone know what happened?
    Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists
    single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed.
    Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals but
    they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road laws.
    Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times from
    approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast where I
    was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by a motorists
    at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us cyclists riding two
    abreast is against the law.
    Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know
    two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us
    getting killed.

    JoeDe

  2. JoeDe said:

    Ok, so does anyone know what happened?
    Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists
    single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed.
    Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals but
    they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road laws.
    Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times from
    approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast where I
    was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by a motorists
    at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us cyclists riding two
    abreast is against the law.
    Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know
    two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us
    getting killed.

    JoeDe


    There's more than one council involved. The 1 in 20 is divided between
    the City of Knox at the Boronia/The Basin end, and Yarra Ranges higher
    up. And if you include Montrose/Kalorama, Maroondah as well.
    As for advertising, on the (Vic) State Bicycle Committee 20 years ago,
    we were told that if we wanted to modify road users attitudes, with less
    than a million dollars we were wasting our time. Correct for inflation
    and that still holds true.
    The facts are, a tiny percentage of motorists are actively antagonistic
    (usually male, aged 17 - 39), whilst a larger percentage simply regard
    us as an impediment and/or have no idea what the road laws on cyclists
    are anyway.
    The relevant authorities claim to be encouraging cycling as an
    environmentally friendly alternative. The reality is our road system,
    particularly in outer areas, is just [censored], with little or no provision
    for anything other than the Great God Car.
    No, in general we don't get killed, as we're experienced and accustomed
    to this. But 99 per cent around here don't ride to start with, and
    aren't going to while facilities remain at best derisory.
    Cheers,
    Ray

  3. "ray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JoeDe said:

    Ok, so does anyone know what happened?
    Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists
    single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed.
    Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals
    but they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road
    laws.
    Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times
    from approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast
    where I was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by
    a motorists at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us
    cyclists riding two abreast is against the law.
    Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public
    know two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of
    us getting killed.

    JoeDe


    There's more than one council involved. The 1 in 20 is divided between the
    City of Knox at the Boronia/The Basin end, and Yarra Ranges higher up. And
    if you include Montrose/Kalorama, Maroondah as well.
    As for advertising, on the (Vic) State Bicycle Committee 20 years ago, we
    were told that if we wanted to modify road users attitudes, with less than
    a million dollars we were wasting our time. Correct for inflation and that
    still holds true.
    The facts are, a tiny percentage of motorists are actively antagonistic
    (usually male, aged 17 - 39), whilst a larger percentage simply regard us
    as an impediment and/or have no idea what the road laws on cyclists are
    anyway.
    The relevant authorities claim to be encouraging cycling as an
    environmentally friendly alternative. The reality is our road system,
    particularly in outer areas, is just [censored], with little or no provision for
    anything other than the Great God Car.
    No, in general we don't get killed, as we're experienced and accustomed to
    this. But 99 per cent around here don't ride to start with, and aren't
    going to while facilities remain at best derisory.
    Cheers,
    Ray

    Great to hear the signs are no longer there so I'll be copping a smidgin
    less abuse while riding up and down this road.

  4. OK, so who made a midnight ride up the 1:20 with a shifting spanner? :-)

  5. <treadly&amp>; "me" <[email hidden]>
    wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    OK, so who made a midnight ride up the 1:20 with a shifting spanner? :-)

    --
    treadly&me


    Dunno, but prempted me!

  6. JoeDe said:

    <Snip>
    Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know
    two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us
    getting killed.

    JoeDe

    Such ads would only be invested in when "3+ cyclist abreast cameras"
    become affordable and GovCo has to justify their widespread installation.

  7. Sir Lex said:

    Such ads would only be invested in when "3+ cyclist abreast cameras"
    become affordable and GovCo has to justify their widespread installation.

    3 abreast is legal when some are overtaking. The camera also needs to
    be placed in the lane - from the side of the road can make 2 look like
    a lot more.

  8. Aeek said:


    3 abreast is legal when some are overtaking. The camera also needs to
    be placed in the lane - from the side of the road can make 2 look like
    a lot more.

    Also would be no use if it's an overtaking driver's view. Riders may be two
    abreast but just some in a bunch on a different alignment, looking like 3
    from behind. I've often thought this is why some drivers get on such a high
    horse over cyclists two abreast or more. They see a bunch and think that all
    will be rigidly in line, like a train track. Real world conditions mean this
    may not always be the case.

    --
    Cheers
    Peter

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.