UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycling to work banned

Started by James Annan · · Last activity · 85 posts · 3,498 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
21 January 2004
Last activity
30 January 2004
Original author
James Annan
Posts
85
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,498
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 85
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and prediction
    of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our Mother
    Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to issue
    diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours possible.

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.

    Anyway, we rode a tandem before we came to Japan, and continued after our arrival a few years ago.
    Some bureaucrat noticed this immediately, and made disapproving noises, but we ignored him - he
    refused to give us an official FRSGC badge for the bike, but we found this apparent reprimand
    surprisingly easy to cope with. Three years later, and he (or perhaps some replacement) is back with
    a vengeance. He has insisted that we cannot continue to ride the tandem to work. If we continue, he
    will ban all cycling for all members of staff. The justification for this escalation (and whether is
    it in principle legally possible) is not clear, and we haven't told any other cyclists yet. We don't
    want to stop riding the tandem, as it is faster, safer and easier than riding single bikes, and more
    fun too. People recognise us on our regular route, and are friendly towards us, plus we've got a
    good tandem (um...3 tandems) and no suitable single bikes. Every day we pass the same police boxes,
    we have even met some policemen and of course they are not bothered about us "flouting" such a
    petty, trivial and obviously accidental law.

    In Japan (in a clear contrast with the UK), the commute to work is partly the responsibility of the
    employer. For instance, an injury during the commute counts as a industrial accident, and the
    employer must pay for subsequent medical bills and sick pay (the latter which for non-work-related
    injury and illness does not appear to be a statutory requirement, or even part of our generally
    reasonable working conditions). It is not clear to me why this responsibility should give them the
    right to dictate methods of travel to work, but I have heard of another company where driving to
    work was banned, and someone was fired after having a crash and getting caught.

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.

    James

  2. James Annan said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and
    prediction of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our
    Mother Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to
    issue diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours
    possible.


    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.

    I think the standard answer would end withe the phrase, "...and bury the body."

    What I want to know is how they can possibly consider banning cycling when they themselves has a
    research programme aimed at developing a hydrological cycle.

    Colin
    --

  3. "James Annan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened.

    Interesting situation.

    If the person has the power to send you packing, and you really want to stay, then I'd suck it up
    and pony up for some mama charis.

    polite about it (I'll talk it over with my wife, I need to consider my finances, ad infinitum)

    --
    Regards, Ryan Ginstrom

  4. Sorry but I have no hints or tips. Only this observation.

    Of all the retarded things I have heard and/or faced since I have been in this wonderful(I really
    think so,too)country....this is without a doubt Number One on the Corky chart.........with a bullet!

    Brian

  5. On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:15:29 +0900, James Annan ...

    Quoted message said:

    I can't give you any advice but only the observation that you won't get a reason for this decision.
    The first "reason" is this is the policy. If you press the point you might get "the decision was
    made after due consideration etc", then possibly "we are concerned about your safety". You are very
    unlikely to be told it is because of insurance etc...

    .

    ----

    someone who wants junk mail [email hidden]

  6. <snippety snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will be gratefully received.

    Hmm, difficult one. Personally, I'd comply when commuting to work - no use bringing your employer
    and colleagues into the slinging match.

    Then start getting arsey: have people take photos and videos of the pair of you on the tandem; write
    Haiku poetry dedicated to your love of cycling during the beautiful seasons, what with the falling
    leaves 'n' all; hell, get dedications of tandem cycling love from the natives. Do all this, bundle
    up a big package and send it to the beaurocrat on a weekly basis.

    Then, once the guy's sufficiently vitriolic, sneak on him to his boss.

    Either way, should be fun.

    Tom.

  7. James Annan said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and
    prediction of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our
    Mother Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to
    issue diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours
    possible.

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.


    --snip

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.


    As much as I love Japan the odd bit off petty bureacracy can put you off an entire nation. My friend
    once got told to cycle on the pavement not on the road which was fun and a pal of mine practicing
    keepie-ups in the middle of an empty public football pitch got told to clear off by a guy in a
    uniform and hat deployed specifically for such incidents it seems. I'd just keep riding the thing.
    Have a talk with your local labour office who were very supportive when I worked in [censored]. If it's
    more then a work issue then I have no idea what you can do other than keep riding until forced off
    the bike by the self defence force.

  8. James Annan wrote: [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will be gratefully received.

    Not sure about sensible, but you've got 3 tandems: how about riding one each for a while to make
    the point?

    - Bill -

  9. "James Annan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    <a sorry tale>

    Boo, hiss, bunch of [censored], etc. Erm, sorry, can't come up with any helpful suggestions.

    (how about riding the s+s one and taking it apart?)

    cheers, clive

  10. On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:57:31 -0000, in
    <[email hidden]>, "Thomas" <tom [at]

    greysheep dot co dot uk said:

    <snippety snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will be gratefully received.

    Hmm, difficult one. Personally, I'd comply when commuting to work - no use bringing your employer
    and colleagues into the slinging match.

    I have no idea of Japanese law. Where does your commute start from? Does it start from the address
    held by your employer, or can your commute start from a point 25m away from the factory gates?

    Can you ride your tandem from home to that 25m point?
    --
    I remember when the internet was only in black & white. It only had a few pages but at least they
    all worked. Email: Put only the word "richard" before the @ sign.

  11. "James Annan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, we rode a tandem before we came to Japan, and continued after our arrival a few years ago.
    Some bureaucrat noticed this immediately, and made disapproving noises, but we ignored him - he
    refused to give us an official FRSGC badge for the bike, but we found this apparent reprimand
    surprisingly easy to cope with. Three years later, and he (or perhaps some replacement) is back
    with a vengeance. He has insisted that we cannot continue to ride the tandem to work. If we
    continue, he will ban all cycling for all members of staff. The justification for this escalation
    (and whether is it in principle legally possible) is not clear, and we haven't told any other
    cyclists yet.

    Can't you just park it round the corner and walk the last bit?

  12. Following on from James Annan's message. . . [Bizarre story of Little Togo trying to ban cycling to
    work snipped]

    Why not organise the other cyclists. Find as many tandems as you can (you already have 3) get the
    other cyclists on-board them and swoop after getting the TV involved. Have the other cyclists on
    ordinary bikes who won't fit on a tandem. (Or a uni-cycle - That should bust the blood vessels of
    the pea-brain bureaucrat.)

    Your fellow cyclists are your best allies, and the TV coverage should rub it in. I suspect that
    there will be plenty of people who hate Little Togo's guts and won't be sorry to see him taken down
    a notch or two.

    My knowledge of Japanese culture is slim but it might be an idea to hint to fellow cyclists that you
    have already been contacted by a _foreign_ TV station that wants to run the story about the
    'stupidity of little yellow people' and it might be an idea to deal with it now and locally
    otherwise it will become another stick to hit them with. There is plenty enough in this story to
    make it journalistically worth-while.

    [Anyway you need protection - It's not right - The little people being bullied like this - I have
    this vision of 'The Seven Tandemi' - what an epic film that'll make... First collect your Tandemii -
    The old boy found gently mending punctures outside his hut through to the kid with the mongrel bike
    built from salvaged parts and held together with bits of bent wire. Second the spiritual part - The
    practising the exact arm signals, greasing the chain, truing the wheels, polishing the h****ts and
    putting anti-mist on goggles. Third putting on the fighting gear - Lycra, raincapes and cycle clips.
    Finally they all die violently in a cinematic maelstrom.]

    --
    PETER FOX Not the same since the deckchair business folded
    [email hidden] www.eminent.demon.co.uk/wcc.htm Witham Cycling
    Campaign www.eminent.demon.co.uk/rides East Anglian Pub cycle rides

  13. James Annan said:

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.

    Would the solution not be for one of you to get off a hundred yards from the gate, and for one to
    arrive a single rider on a single (tandem) bike and the other to arrive on foot? Face saved, no
    problem, Herbert-from-security San. Sayonara.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simon Windows 95: You, you, you! You
    make a grown man cry...
    M. Jagger/K. Richards

  14. In "]news:[email hidden],
    James Annan <[email hidden]> radiated into the
    WorldWideWait:

    Quoted message said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and
    prediction of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our
    Mother Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to
    issue diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours
    possible.

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.

    Anyway, we rode a tandem before we came to Japan, and continued after our arrival a few years ago.
    Some bureaucrat noticed this immediately, and made disapproving noises, but we ignored him - he
    refused to give us an official FRSGC badge for the bike, but we found this apparent reprimand
    surprisingly easy to cope with. Three years later, and he (or perhaps some replacement) is back
    with a vengeance. He has insisted that we cannot continue to ride the tandem to work. If we
    continue, he will ban all cycling for all members of staff. The justification for this escalation
    (and whether is it in principle legally possible) is not clear, and we haven't told any other
    cyclists yet. We don't want to stop riding the tandem, as it is faster, safer and easier than
    riding single bikes, and more fun too. People recognise us on our regular route, and are friendly
    towards us, plus we've got a good tandem (um...3 tandems) and no suitable single bikes. Every day
    we pass the same police boxes, we have even met some policemen and of course they are not bothered
    about us "flouting" such a petty, trivial and obviously accidental law.

    In Japan (in a clear contrast with the UK), the commute to work is partly the responsibility of
    the employer. For instance, an injury during the commute counts as a industrial accident, and the
    employer must pay for subsequent medical bills and sick pay (the latter which for non-work-related
    injury and illness does not appear to be a statutory requirement, or even part of our generally
    reasonable working conditions). It is not clear to me why this responsibility should give them the
    right to dictate methods of travel to work, but I have heard of another company where driving to
    work was banned, and someone was fired after having a crash and getting caught.

    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.

    He must have a boss and that boss must have a boss and... Keep going up with appointments wherein
    you point out that this is abysmal stupidity. It's just the sort of story that newspapers would
    love, especially with all names & titles & quotes (when I do something like this, I have a
    microrecorder running in my breast pocket).

  15. "Peter Fox" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    [Anyway you need protection - It's not right - The little people being bullied like this - I have
    this vision of 'The Seven Tandemi' -

    Is that 7 tandems or 3 tandems and a tag-along?

    pk

  16. James Annan said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan

    Cruel race ;-)

  17. On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:15:29 +0900, James Annan
    <[email hidden]> brought down from the Mount tablets
    inscribed:

    Quoted message said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and prediction
    of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our Mother
    Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to issue
    diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours possible.

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.

    Anyway, we rode a tandem before we came to Japan, and continued after our arrival a few years ago.
    Some bureaucrat noticed this immediately, and made disapproving noises, but we ignored him - he
    refused to give us an official FRSGC badge for the bike, but we found this apparent reprimand
    surprisingly easy to cope with. Three years later, and he (or perhaps some replacement) is back
    with a vengeance. He has insisted that we cannot continue to ride the tandem to work. If we
    continue, he will ban all cycling for all members of staff. The justification for this escalation
    (and whether is it in principle legally possible) is not clear, and we haven't told any other
    cyclists yet. We don't want to stop riding the tandem, as it is faster, safer and easier than
    riding single bikes, and more fun too. People recognise us on our regular route, and are friendly
    towards us, plus we've got a good tandem (um...3 tandems) and no suitable single bikes. Every day
    we pass the same police boxes, we have even met some policemen and of course they are not bothered
    about us "flouting" such a petty, trivial and obviously accidental law.

    In Japan (in a clear contrast with the UK), the commute to work is partly the responsibility of the
    employer. For instance, an injury during the commute counts as a industrial accident, and the
    employer must pay for subsequent medical bills and sick pay (the latter which for non-work-related
    injury and illness does not appear to be a statutory requirement, or even part of our generally
    reasonable working conditions). It is not clear to me why this responsibility should give them the
    right to dictate methods of travel to work, but I have heard of another company where driving to
    work was banned, and someone was fired after having a crash and getting caught.

    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused more
    than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more). Bureaucrats
    aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-minded petty
    jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will be gratefully
    received.

    Okay....now I get it.

    Short answer is that both you and your employer are being obstinate asses, though they do come off
    looking slightly better than you. How do you think it looks for a quasi-governmental agency to have
    their employees breaking the law on their commute to work every day?

    Advice:

    1. Get two bicycles
    2. Get your ass off your shoulders
    3. Give us all this from the beginning instead of this roundabout [censored]

    --

    Michael Cash

    "I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of
    a high school transcript."

    Dr. Howard Sprague
    Dean of Admissions
    Mount Pilot College

  18. James Annan said:
    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.

    Welcome to the Japanese culture I came to love so much. What you need is a good Japanese friend of
    standing who can "negotiate" with the official causing you problems. It can be solved but remember
    "the nail that stands out will be hammered down" so don't try aggression or disobedience - it
    doesn't work in the way it might in England and you will just get a hardening of attitudes. The
    phrase you need is "go with the flow". It needs to be negotiated by a respected Japanese in Japanese
    (using all the subtleties of the language which only native speakers have mastered).

    Ganbatte!

    Tony

  19. Duke of URL' macbenahATkdsiDOTnet said:

    In "]news:[email hidden], James Annan <[email hidden]>
    radiated into the WorldWideWait:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where
    we live and work.

    Quoted message said:

    He must have a boss and that boss must have a boss and... Keep going up with appointments wherein
    you point out that this is abysmal stupidity.

    In my limited experience of Japan I would regard it as extremely important to find out from locals
    about how to manage this, the danger being that ordinary Western standards of logic and
    confrontation would be regarded as so unforgivably insulting that they would precipitate a totally
    negative reaction, one which the proper application of unbelievably circuitous Japanese euphemisms
    could easily avoid.

    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    ["]http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  20. "James Annan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well, it hasn't been yet. But it has been threatened. This is at a Govt funded (quasi-independent,
    the management structure is somewhat obscure) scientific research lab in Japan
    (jamstec.go.jpeng). The main goal of the lab is the understanding and
    prediction of climate change, and it issues plenty of warm fuzzy statemente about "Protecting our
    Mother Earth", but when the bureaucratic chips are down, it seems that it is more important to
    issue diktats and invent rules to outlaw one of the most environmentally-friendly behaviours
    possible.

    The real reason behind this is that my wife and I are recidivist criminals. Yes, we ride a tandem
    (we both work at the same lab). It seems that way back in the mists of time, some careless
    bureaucrat drafted a law that was intended to prevent more than one person riding on a standard
    bicycle, but which accidentally included tandems in the prohibition. (Despite the law, carrying a
    passenger is very common, and of course no-one enforces such a petty nonsense anyway.) Some
    prefectures have actually changed the law to allow tandems, but unfortunately not the one where we
    live and work.

    Anyway, we rode a tandem before we came to Japan, and continued after our arrival a few years ago.
    Some bureaucrat noticed this immediately, and made disapproving noises, but we ignored him - he
    refused to give us an official FRSGC badge for the bike, but we found this apparent reprimand
    surprisingly easy to cope with. Three years later, and he (or perhaps some replacement) is back
    with a vengeance. He has insisted that we cannot continue to ride the tandem to work. If we
    continue, he will ban all cycling for all members of staff. The justification for this escalation
    (and whether is it in principle legally possible) is not clear, and we haven't told any other
    cyclists yet. We don't want to stop riding the tandem, as it is faster, safer and easier than
    riding single bikes, and more fun too. People recognise us on our regular route, and are friendly
    towards us, plus we've got a good tandem (um...3 tandems) and no suitable single bikes. Every day
    we pass the same police boxes, we have even met some policemen and of course they are not bothered
    about us "flouting" such a petty, trivial and obviously accidental law.

    In Japan (in a clear contrast with the UK), the commute to work is partly the responsibility of
    the employer. For instance, an injury during the commute counts as a industrial accident, and the
    employer must pay for subsequent medical bills and sick pay (the latter which for non-work-related
    injury and illness does not appear to be a statutory requirement, or even part of our generally
    reasonable working conditions). It is not clear to me why this responsibility should give them the
    right to dictate methods of travel to work, but I have heard of another company where driving to
    work was banned, and someone was fired after having a crash and getting caught.

    Quoted message said:

    unfortunately workers' rights are still a rather foreign concept here and it is clear that any
    foreigner who kicks up too much of a fuss gets sent home in short order (I have already caused
    more than my share of trouble, and now is definitely not a good time to start any more).
    Bureaucrats aside, I like it here, and am not in a rush to leave. But I don't take kindly to small-
    minded petty jobsworths trying to push me around. Any hints and tips for a sensible strategy will
    be gratefully received.

    It sounds like the boss has some good reasons for his decision ... not great, but good. I'm sure he
    doesn't appreciate a foreigner trying to push him around either.

    If his beef is that the company may be responsible for you while you're commuting to work, couldn't
    you relieve the company of this burden? Have a lawyer draw up some legal jive saying you exempt the
    company from any responsibilities outside of work.

    If you feel that strongly about it, then I'm sure you wouldn't mind giving up your medical coverage
    in case of an accident, or any kind of benefits you would receive if injured while commuting.

    C.Q.C.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.