Cycling core workout: How to focus on torso rotation

I hear you, friend. You're questioning the status quo, and I respect that. Many cyclists and trainers focus on planks and Russian twists, but let's consider this: what if we're missing the mark? Torso rotation is key, and advanced moves like med ball throws and cable rotations can truly isolate those external obliques. By targeting these muscles, you'll boost torque and speed, leaving outdated methods in the dust. It's time to revolutionize our cycling workouts! 🚀

Ignoring the efficacy of planks and Russian twists may be hasty. These exercises can contribute to overall core stability, which is crucial for efficient power transfer in cycling. However, overemphasis on these exercises can indeed neglect the importance of rotational force. A balanced approach, incorporating both rotational and stability exercises, might be the key to unlocking a rider's full potential.

Pfft, planks and Russian twists again? Look, sure, they might add some stability but focusing solely on 'em's like neglecting rotational force. Ain't no balance in that. Try med ball throws, cable rotations, see how it boosts torque, speed. Outdated methods, time to move on.

When targeting external obliques, focus on torso rotation. Outdated exercises like planks & Russian twists aren't ideal, as they don't improve torque & speed. Instead, try rotational medicine ball throws & cable rotations, which isolate the muscles used in cycling. Ever considered PNF exercises? They're a game changer!🤔

Outdated exercises like planks and Russian twists? Nonsense! Cyclists need stabilization, too. Sure, rotational medicine ball throws and cable rotations target obliques, but they're not the only way. Overemphasizing rotational force can lead to overcompensation and injury. Variety in exercise selection is key. Don't dismiss what's worked for many cyclists in the past. It's not one-size-fits-all. And remember, form and technique are crucial in any exercise regimen. :roll\_eyes:

Hear ya, but I gotta disagree with the dismissal of "outdated" exercises like planks and Russian twists. Sure, they might not isolate obliques as much as med ball throws or cable rotations, but they still got their place in cycling training. Stabilization is key, and planks can help with that. Plus, too much focus on rotational force might lead to overcompensation and injury, like you said. So I say, keep the variety in exercise selection, but don't ditch what's worked for many cyclists in the past. Form and technique, always crucial.

I hear ya, but I gotta push back on the praise for planks. Yeah, stabilization matters, but planks only hit some muscles. Focusing too much on 'em can mean neglecting others. I'd say, sure, keep 'em in the mix, but don't overdo it. Balance is key.

Yeah, you're right about not overdoing planks. Like, obsessin' over 'em's like only ridin' in the saddle, never standin' up on those climbs. Sure, saddles important, but so is variability, right? Overemphasizin' one muscle group can lead to imbalances, just like stickin' to flat terrain ignores the benefits of hills. So, y'know, keep planks, but don't make 'em your whole workout. Just like ridin' a bike, diversity's key.

Yeah, preachin' about planks gets old. Just like ridin' in the saddle, it's part of the mix, but not the whole enchilada. Mix it up, find that sweet spot. Hill climbs, sprints, even a lil' cyclocross if ya fancy. Ain't no one-trick pony here.

Cycling's about power and efficiency, right? So why are we still stuck with these stale exercises? Planks and Russian twists? C'mon. They ain't cutting it for real cyclists. We need to zero in on those external obliques if we want to crank out more torque. What’s the deal with trainers ignoring the science? Why not get into the nitty-gritty of rotational strength? Is it just tradition holding us back from serious gains?