UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycling and Your Child leaflets

Started by Tom Crispin · · Last activity · 20 posts · 683 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
11 October 2006
Last activity
13 October 2006
Original author
Tom Crispin
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
683
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've received 300 Cycling and Your Child leaflets from Transport for
    London.

    They look stunning.

    If anyone would like a copy please email your snail address to leaflet
    *at* johnballcycling.org.uk.

  2. Tom Crispin said:

    I've received 300 Cycling and Your Child leaflets from Transport for
    London.

    They look stunning.

    If anyone would like a copy please email your snail address to leaflet
    *at* johnballcycling.org.uk.

    How about hosting a scan?

  3. Quoted message said:
    Tom Crispin said:

    I've received 300 Cycling and Your Child leaflets from Transport for
    London.

    They look stunning.

    If anyone would like a copy please email your snail address to leaflet
    *at* johnballcycling.org.uk.

    How about hosting a scan?

    A substantially similar leaflet is available for online download on
    Peter's site,
    http://www.personal.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/cyclingchild.htm.

    I'll take some photos of the TfL version on my new coffee table
    tonight.

  4. Tom Crispin said:

    A substantially similar leaflet is available for online download on
    Peter's site,
    http://www.personal.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/cyclingchild.htm.

    And having taken delivery of a smart digital camera a couple of days
    ago, I think I'll finally get a Round Tuit to fill in the Missing
    Pictures in the site's support material to back up the leaflet :-)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  5. Peter Clinch said:
    Tom Crispin said:

    A substantially similar leaflet is available for online download on
    Peter's site,
    http://www.personal.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/cyclingchild.htm.

    And having taken delivery of a smart digital camera a couple of days
    ago, I think I'll finally get a Round Tuit to fill in the Missing
    Pictures in the site's support material to back up the leaflet :-)

    Tom's sending me some so I can pass one one to you..

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    ...d

  6. David Martin said:
    Peter Clinch said:


    And having taken delivery of a smart digital camera a couple of days
    ago, I think I'll finally get a Round Tuit to fill in the Missing
    Pictures in the site's support material to back up the leaflet :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    Roos

  7. Roos Eisma said:

    "David Martin" <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    So far he's /amazed/ with it. I'd been waiting for a compact waterproof
    one to come along and Roos saw a review of the 720 in Fjell og Vide that
    hit the bases, and further research showed the 725 was just a new
    version with an extra couple of meters waterproofing and a more
    colourful case that's harder to lose in the snow.

    I /think/ I know what all the buttons do now...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  8. Peter Clinch said:
    Roos Eisma said:

    "David Martin" <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    So far he's /amazed/ with it. I'd been waiting for a compact waterproof
    one to come along and Roos saw a review of the 720 in Fjell og Vide that
    hit the bases, and further research showed the 725 was just a new
    version with an extra couple of meters waterproofing and a more
    colourful case that's harder to lose in the snow.

    How do you get hold of Fjell og Vidde? Are you DNT members?

    The only issues I have heard about with the Olympus is 1) the image
    post processing isn't brilliant (compared to the pentax or canon/nikon
    compacts), and that the lens cover can get jammed with sand if you are
    not too careful. Otherwise it is the mutts nutts.

    *jealous*

    ...d

  9. Peter Clinch said:
    Roos Eisma said:

    "David Martin" <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    So far he's /amazed/ with it. I'd been waiting for a compact waterproof
    one to come along and Roos saw a review of the 720 in Fjell og Vide that
    hit the bases, and further research showed the 725 was just a new
    version with an extra couple of meters waterproofing and a more
    colourful case that's harder to lose in the snow.

    How do you get hold of Fjell og Vidde? Are you DNT members?

    The only issues I have heard about with the Olympus is 1) the image
    post processing isn't brilliant (compared to the pentax or canon/nikon
    compacts), and that the lens cover can get jammed with sand if you are
    not too careful. Otherwise it is the mutts nutts.

    *jealous*

    ...d

  10. Peter Clinch said:
    Roos Eisma said:

    "David Martin" <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thinking of getting a new camera as I saw the waterproof pentax at a
    good price locally.. very small and prob ideal for your aquatic
    escapades as well..

    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    So far he's /amazed/ with it. I'd been waiting for a compact waterproof
    one to come along and Roos saw a review of the 720 in Fjell og Vide that
    hit the bases, and further research showed the 725 was just a new
    version with an extra couple of meters waterproofing and a more
    colourful case that's harder to lose in the snow.

    How do you get hold of Fjell og Vidde? Are you DNT members?

    The only issues I have heard about with the Olympus is 1) the image
    post processing isn't brilliant (compared to the pentax or canon/nikon
    compacts), and that the lens cover can get jammed with sand if you are
    not too careful. Otherwise it is the mutts nutts.

    *jealous*

    ...d

  11. David Martin said:

    How do you get hold of Fjell og Vidde? Are you DNT members?

    We are. It's an optional extra for membership, and since Roos reads the
    lingo we get it (I just look at the pictures!).

    Quoted message said:

    The only issues I have heard about with the Olympus is 1) the image
    post processing isn't brilliant (compared to the pentax or canon/nikon
    compacts)

    The red-eye correction certainly seems to work well, anyway!

    Quoted message said:

    *jealous*

    We /might/ allow your gaze to fall upon it briefly. From a distance.
    If you're lucky... ;-)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Tom Crispin said:


    I'll take some photos of the TfL version on my new coffee table
    tonight.

    I know that multi-function mobile phones are all the rage, but a coffee
    table that can take photos? What's this, the latest think in stealth
    technology? :P 😉

    David Lloyd
    The pub is responsible for my opinions.

  13. Roos Eisma wrote on 12/10/2006 09:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    Olympus and Nikon are the best option IMO - their approach is to give
    the most accurate rendition whereas many of the others go for the most
    visually impressive results.

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  14. Tom Crispin said:

    I'll take some photos of the TfL version on my new coffee table
    tonight.

    I reckon you should get it printed on a jersey and display it in your
    kitchen.

    --
    Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Bristol to Bath by unicycle: <http://www.bristoltobathonaunicycle.co.uk>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  15. Tony Raven said:

    Roos Eisma wrote on 12/10/2006 09:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    Olympus and Nikon are the best option IMO - their approach is to give
    the most accurate rendition whereas many of the others go for the most
    visually impressive results.

    I've not used an olympus but prefer the Canon compacts over the Nikon
    ones because they give me more control - ie I can control almost
    everything on it. Macro with the Nikon (admittedly several years ago)
    was a pain.

    Must investigate the Olympus one - another friend has one too.

    ...d

  16. David Martin said:


    Tony Raven said:

    Roos Eisma wrote on 12/10/2006 09:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    This is the Olympus Mju 725SW which is 7 Mpix, water proof to 5m and
    shockproof for dropping from 1.5 m and amazingly small and light. And he'd
    better be happy with it and not look at other camera's or Santa will
    demand the non-birthday half back this coming Xmas!

    Olympus and Nikon are the best option IMO - their approach is to give
    the most accurate rendition whereas many of the others go for the most
    visually impressive results.

    I've not used an olympus but prefer the Canon compacts over the Nikon
    ones because they give me more control - ie I can control almost
    everything on it. Macro with the Nikon (admittedly several years ago)
    was a pain.

    Must investigate the Olympus one - another friend has one too.

    All my photos are taken on an Olympus mju 400. I've had the camera 4
    or 5 years, no problems.

  17. David Martin said:

    I've not used an olympus but prefer the Canon compacts over the Nikon
    ones because they give me more control - ie I can control almost
    everything on it. Macro with the Nikon (admittedly several years ago)
    was a pain.

    Neither appear to do waterproof models, so they both failed to get to
    the "really interested" list. There seems to be a fair amount of
    control available on the u725 but then I'm comparing with an XA-1 where
    the control consisted of where you pointed it...
    It seems to do everything I need and a lot more besides, but I'm not
    really a photographer.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  18. Peter Clinch said:
    David Martin said:

    I've not used an olympus but prefer the Canon compacts over the Nikon
    ones because they give me more control - ie I can control almost
    everything on it. Macro with the Nikon (admittedly several years ago)
    was a pain.

    Neither appear to do waterproof models, so they both failed to get to
    the "really interested" list. There seems to be a fair amount of
    control available on the u725 but then I'm comparing with an XA-1 where
    the control consisted of where you pointed it...
    It seems to do everything I need and a lot more besides, but I'm not
    really a photographer.

    I'll have to have a look at one soon - or the pentax optio (very
    small.. looks nice but there have been some questions about it's
    reliability wrt waterproofness.)

    IIRC the olympus can be dropped as well (what did for my Nikon).
    I do have an olympus but it is a point and shoot film camera.

    I'm sure some of the current problems with my canon A60 are due to it
    getting damp in the pocket of my cycle jersey. (to drag this back
    vaguely on-topic).

    ...d

  19. David Martin said:

    IIRC the olympus can be dropped as well (what did for my Nikon).
    I do have an olympus but it is a point and shoot film camera.

    According to the blurb it's shockproof to 1.5m using Olympus' own tests.
    I'm not too bothered to find out exactly what those were since (unlike
    the waterproofing) I have no intention of /deliberately/ putting it to
    the test!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  20. David Martin said:


    I'm sure some of the current problems with my canon A60 are due to it
    getting damp in the pocket of my cycle jersey. (to drag this back
    vaguely on-topic).

    I'm presently trying to resurrect my Pam PDA after being caught in
    Wednesday's thunderstorms :-((
    It's looking pretty dead so a replacement is likely to be sought.

    John B

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.